Patents
Literature
Hiro is an intelligent assistant for R&D personnel, combined with Patent DNA, to facilitate innovative research.
Hiro

406results about "Branch-and-bound" patented technology

Probabilistic sampling using search trees constrained by heuristic bounds

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling of elements of a domain to be sampled is performed to generate a set of samples. The MCMC sampling is performed over a search tree of decision sequences representing the domain to be sampled and having terminal nodes corresponding to elements of the domain. In some embodiments the MCMC sampling is performed by Metropolis-Hastings (MH) sampling. The MCMC sampling is constrained using a bound on nodes of the search tree. The constraint may entail detecting a node whose bound value ensures that an acceptable element cannot be identified by continuing traversal of the tree past that node, and terminating the traversal in response. The constraint may entail selecting a node to serve as a starting node for a sampling attempt in accordance with a statistical promise distribution indicating likelihood that following a decision sequence rooted at the node will identify an acceptable element.
Owner:XEROX CORP

System for solving of a constraint-satisfaction problem and constructing of a system

A system and method for processing a large constraint satisfaction problem quickly, including a subset generating module (1), which divides a set of alternatives provided for a plurality of parts of a given problem into a plurality of subsets, such that each subset has not more than two alternatives for each part. For each subset generated by the division, a solution calculation module (2) finds a solution by calculating combinations of alternatives satisfying a constraint between alternatives selected for each two parts. The calculation of a solution for a subset, such that each subset has not more than two alternatives for each part, requires a very short period of processing time, even if the parts are many. Thus, the sum of the times required for finding a solution for all the subsets is much shorter than the time required for finding a solution for the original problem without such processing.
Owner:KK TOSHIBA

Autonomous learning platform for novel feature discovery

ActiveUS20180330258A1Decreasing overall cost functionReduce functionArtificial lifeProbabilistic networksInformation spaceNODAL
Embodiments are directed to a method of performing autonomous learning for updating input features used for an artificial intelligence model, the method comprising receiving updated data of an information space that includes a graph of nodes having a defined topology, the updated data including historical data of requests to the artificial intelligence model and output results associated with the requests, wherein different categories of input data corresponds to different input nodes of the graph. The method may further comprise updating edge connections between the nodes of the graph by performing path optimizations that each use a set of agents to explore the information space over cycles to reduce a cost function, each connection including a strength value, wherein during each path optimization, path information is shared between the rest of agents at each cycle for determining a next position value for each of the set of agents in the graph.
Owner:VISA INT SERVICE ASSOC

Cross media recommendation

Methods, systems and computer program products are provided for cross-media recommendation by store a plurality of taste profiles corresponding to a first domain and a plurality of media item vectors corresponding to a second domain. An evaluation taste profile in the first domain is applied to a plurality of models that have been generated based on relationship among the plurality of taste profiles and the plurality of media item vectors, and obtain a plurality of resulting codes corresponding to at least one of the plurality of media item vectors in the second domain.
Owner:SPOTIFY

Knowledge extraction and prediction

Methods and systems for knowledge extraction and prediction are described. In an example, a computerized method, and system for performing the method, can include receiving historical data pertaining to a domain of interest, receiving predetermined heuristics design data associated with the domain of interest, and using the predetermined heuristics design and historical data, automatically creating causal maps including a hierarchy of nodes, each node of the hierarchy of nodes being associated with a plurality of quantization points and reference temporal patterns, the plurality quantization points being known reference spatial patterns. In an example the computerized method, and system for performing the method, can further include receiving, at each node, a plurality of unknown patterns pertaining to a cause associated with the domain of interest, automatically mapping the plurality of unknown patterns to the quantization points using spatial similarities of the unknown patterns and the quantization points, automatically pooling the quantization points into a temporal pattern, the temporal pattern being a sequence of spatial patterns that represent the cause, automatically mapping the temporal pattern to a reference temporal pattern, automatically creating a sequence of the temporal patterns, and automatically recognizing the cause using the sequence of temporal patterns.
Owner:USAA

Optimal test suite reduction as a network maximum flow

A novel approach to test-suite reduction based on network maximum flows. Given a test suite T and a set of test requirements R, the method identifies a minimal set of test cases which maintains the coverage of test requirements. The approach encodes the problem with a bipartite directed graph and computes a minimum cardinality subset of T that covers R as a search among maximum flows, using the classical Ford-Fulkerson algorithm in combination with efficient constraint programming techniques. Test results have shown that the method outperforms the Integer Linear Programming (ILP) approach by 15-3000 times, in terms of the time needed to find the solution. At the same time, the method obtains the same reduction rate as ILP, because both approaches compute optimal solutions. When compared to the simple greedy approach, the method takes on average 30% more time and produces from 5% to 15% smaller test suites.
Owner:SIMULA INNOVATIONS
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products