Thermal damage to collagen is likely brought about by hydrolysis of cross-linked collagen molecules and reformation of hydrogen bonds resulting in loss of portions or all of the characteristic collagen triple-helix.
Currently no device or method in the medical literature addresses all of these concerns simultaneously.
Sharp instrument undermining is a mainstay of plastic surgery, however even experienced plastic surgeons performing face-lifts may, from time to time, “lose” the correct tissue plane while performing sharp undermining; even with great skill and experience, previous surgical scarring or aberrant anatomy may thwart surgical perfection during sharp scissor or scalpel tissue dissection / undermining.
Unfortunately, blunt undermining alone between highly fibrous tissues that exists in the human face results in irregular tunnels with thick fibrous walls.
Current face-lifting instruments that cut with other than manual energy are incapable of providing a uniform wall free tissue plane during energized face-lifting dissection.
Unfortunately, virtually every skin rejuvenation system that has existed until now (with the exception of injectable skin filling compounds) and even traditional face-lifting surgery (when cutting through the skin around the ear is considered) must pass through the epidermis to attempt to reach and treat the dermis.
Damage to the epidermis and its component structures often results in undesirable colorations or color losses to the skin as is seen in scarring.
Disease and environmental factors such as diet and chemical exposure also take their toll.
Prolotherapy agents have never been previously described for facial tightening or strengthening, to our knowledge, possibly because there is currently no instrument available to precisely create uniform facial tissue planes upon which the chemical gradients' of potential prologherapy agents can act.
All currently available laser treatments, however, exhibit significant problems and these laser systems typically operate safely and effectively only over a narrow, patient dependent treatment range.” The prime reason for the narrow range is the ultra-delicate epidermis.
The absence of epidermal damage in NDR techniques significantly decrease the severity and duration of treatment related side effects.
While it has been demonstrated that these techniques can avoid epidermal damage, the major drawback of these techniques is limited efficacy [ref 26].
Anderson's FP device is external, not designed to, not can it, break the fibrous tissues beneath the surface skin and cannot be passed beneath the skin without another attachment or device such as applicant's tip to “ice-break” the way.
Unfortunately, surface treatments are only temporary and cause only minor tightening.
The difference in results is largely due to the great disparity between the two methods in energy delivered to the tissues.
However most importantly, when it comes to internally electro-modifying human tissues, is that immediately local vaporized tissue regions take on a relatively high electrical impedance, and increase the voltage difference, thus altering further local electrical penetration / treatment of the tissues.
Irregular energy absorption by irregularly thick and irregularly formed fibrous tunnel remnants resulting from the use of devices, other than applicant's, would thus cause visible irregular skin surface effects on healing.
As a result of higher tissue impedance, the current flux lines tend to penetrate less deeply resulting in a smaller depth of tissue heating.
Voltage differences between the active electrode and the target issue cause an electrical arc to form across the physical gap between the electrode and tissue.
At the point of arc contact with tissue, rapid tissue heating occurs due to high current density between the electrode and tissue.
Unfortunately, observing Eggers' diagram 2c top view may lend the incorrect impression of similarity in shape to the applicant tips; however, in Eggers the protrusions are electrodes / conductors which would irregularly violate and destroy the vital human facial tissue structures including the subdermal plexus of vessels on passage if creation of a plane were attempted or even possible.
Without uniform tissue planes to uniformly energize, there cannot be uniformity of tissue contraction.
Without facial uniformity there is only non-uniformity.
All are incapable of yielding tunnel-wall-free, completely uniform facial planes upon which to energetically act thereupon.
. . Joulean heating.” In itself, '354B1 would thus be impossible if not completely impractical device for use as an internal, minimally-invasive, complete facial tissue modification device because fulfilling such requirements of pressing blindly to seal unseen blood vessels up to 10 cm away from a limited incision port would impossible without an endoscope and thus take hours to complete surgery (less than opening up and closing an entire traditional face-lift).
The lateral wire of '248B1 would be forced in a direction opposite the areas of greatest fibrous build-up adjacent non-uniformly lysed tunnels thus resulting in a non-uniform result.
'079B1 uses an active electrode with a dynamic active surface area of varying geometry however, applicant's geometry differs significantly in that '079B1 is incapable of yielding tunnel-wall free completely uniform facial planes which would adversely effect evenness in tissue plane energy absorption.
Additionally, the monopolar cutting current of '079B1 is undesirable for collagen / fibrous tissue modification function of applicant's tissue-modifying-energy-window / zone and would largely damage the delicate underside of the facial dermis and dermal plexus since '079B1's stated and anticipated geometry lacks the protective insulated protrusions of applicant to safeguard such vital structures.
Because of this lack of significant tightening efficacy without permanent epidermal changes or scarification, Visage® has seen only limited use in cosmetic surgery and salons; use at higher energy levels has caused undesirable surface skin scarring.
Unfortunately, the amount of tissue contraction Thermage, Inc. can prove in the medical literature borders upon statistical insignificance (to quote several prominent cosmetic surgeons) and is far less than 5%.
'854B1 Method for Controlled Contraction of Collagen in Fibrous Septae in Subcutaneous Fat is largely viewed in the medical community to be undesirable.
This because cellulite (an undesirable problem) is currently widely thought to be the result of contracted fibrous septae causing in-pocketings of the upper skin layers down toward the fatty layer.
The arrays of electrodes in Brucker are detecting electrodes located around the tip of Brucker in which lies a single energized treatment electrode that only escapes or transiently protrudes from the catheter channel when there exists a need to kill heart cells that are improperly firing electrically; Brucker's protruding arrays are usually not deployed in motion and would likely interfere with motion by catching on tissues during motion, Brucker's protrusions therefore do not aid in device motion.
An endoscope is a cumbersome optical instrument that would usually requires two hands to use at the same time the surgeon is handling Keller's instrument to direct it to the target tissue which would be difficult indeed.
Devices such as Keller can only perform spot tunneling unless the surgeon is also using an endoscope that focuses some type of tissue dissociating energy along an entire tissue plane; unfortunately, to maintain a coordinated planar movement with Keller would be time-consuming and difficult.
Loeb however does not teach any housing or rigid or semi-rigid structure that would allow passage of a bare optical fiber through undissected tough and fibrous human fibro-fatty facial tissue.
In light of the human facial anatomy, where the dermis is composed of almost impenetrable collagen fibers close to the density of football leather and where the subcutaneous fatty layer contains collagenous fibrous septae that are relatively dense although not as dense as the fatty layer of abdomen, Loeb cannot deliver a uniform effect and is impractical as enable in '915.
Unfortunately, the rhytisector tool developed a reputation for intense bleeding leading to bruising, hematomas (blood pools) and unwanted blood vessel laceration (breaking open).
However, Farin's device is not intended for separating tissue planes and is susceptible to catching, tearing or puncturing the tissue when manipulated.
Unfortunately, skin does not thicken in response to stretching and removal; it only thins.