Methods for the in vitro culture of Sporozoea sp. and uses thereof

Inactive Publication Date: 2007-07-31
PATHOGENES +2
View PDF23 Cites 14 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0031]The invention still further provides for a method of screening for agents which destroy or inhibit the growth of protozoa of class Sporozoea comprising culturing a Sporozoea species of interest as described supra, with and without contact with an agent to be screened, and detecting inhibition of growth or viability relative to growth in the absence of the agent of interest.

Problems solved by technology

Overall, the combination of losses due to coccidiosis and the costs of prophylactic medication results in significant annual economic losses to the affected industries.
The economic effects of coccidiosis infections in domestic animals is especially severe in the poultry industry, where intensive housing of birds favors the spread of the disease.
For fowl, e.g., poultry, and other domestic birds, Coccidia infection results in economic loss from stunting and skin discoloration.
Once ingested, the parasite penetrates and damages the mucosal layer of the intestinal wall, causing acute morbidity, e.g, resulting in decreased growth and feed utilization in the infected avians.
Under proper environmental conditions, the oocysts sporulate and become infective.
Thus, in domestic avians, the introduction of another species of Coccidia or the introduction of new, previously unexposed birds may result in an outbreak of the disease.
Non-viable protozoa, or antigens from protozoa, have been unsuccessful in conferring the high level of immunity needed to protect against clinical infection.
However, the use of live animals or, in some Coccidia species, chick eggs, to produce viable Coccidia cells for vaccine production is both costly and inefficient.
Propogation of Coccidia in vitro has been attempted, but with only limited success.
However, as noted above, the requirement to use merizoites derived from infected animal tissues limits the usefulness of these approaches.
Another drawback is that an immortalized cell line derived from chickens provides a risk for transmitting tumorigenicity to chickens if used to make live vaccines.
However, as noted above, no in vitro culture system, providing suitable host cells, has previously been available that allows for indefinite propagation of the asexual phase of Coccidia, ie, the merozoites, with conversion to the infectious stage that can be induced only as required.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Preparing A Continuous Culture System for Inoculation

[0104]A continuous culture system was prepared, as follows.

[0105]An immortalized line of bovine monocyte host cells was passaged 76 times and was found free of mycoplasma. The bovine monocyte cell line was a derivative of the cells according to Speer et al., Id, supra.

[0106]The host cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with penicillin (100 Units / ml), streptomycin (100 μg / ml), amphotericin (2.5 ug / ml), beta-mercaptoethanol (0.055 mM) and 10% horse or bovine serum (maintenance media).

[0107]The host cells were seeded in a 150 cm2 tissue culture flask at approximately 6×104 cells / ml and 15 ml per flask, resulting in a monolayer with a density no greater than 80% to 100% confluency. Cells were incubated as stationary flasks at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were fed with 15 mL fresh maintenance media every 3 days and split every 7 days. Cultures were split by disrupting the monolayer with 0.25% trypsin and plant...

example 2

Culturing Eimeria Species Protozoa

[0108]A sample of Eimeria acervulina oocysts from infected chicken feces was prepared for culturing as follows. A slurry of feces was made by adding 10 parts of water to 1 part of feces and the oocysts were purified by sugar flotation procedure (similar to Sheather's Sugar Flotation as described in L R Ash and T C Orihel, Parasites: A Guide to Laboratory Procedures and Identification, ASCP Press© 1991, pp. 34-35, which reference is incorporated herein in its entirety. Oocysts were concentrated by centrifugation and resuspended in 2.5% potassium dichromate and aerated for 24 to 72 hours at room temperature to facilitate sporulation. The sporocysts were stored at 4° C. until used. The sporulated oocysts were suspended for one minute at about 25° C. in a chlorohexidine gluconate solution [Perioguard™] to kill contaminating bacteria. The chlorohexidine gluconate was removed by washing. Washing was done by pelleting the oocysts by centrifugation (800×g f...

example 3

Storing Sporocyst-Forming Organisms

[0111]The invention also provides a method for evaluating the viability of stored Eimeria oocysts / sporocysts by observing infectivity in in vitro cultures and without the need for inoculation of birds.

[0112]Oocysts / sporocysts of E. acervulina were obtained from chicken feces by sucrose flotation using methods or could be derived from cultures as described in Example 2.

[0113]The oocysts / sporocysts were divided into five equal aliquots. Four of the aliquots were frozen at −20° C. using cryopreserving agents (such as Freezing Media™, Gibco) and the fifth aliquot stored at 2-7° C.

[0114]Viability of the four frozen samples derived from the culture were compared to the viability of the fifth sample that had been refrigerated by comparison of infectivity in bovine monocytes.

[0115]The viability comparison was conducted as follows.

[0116]Briefly, bovine monocytes were planted into 24-well plates containing sterile coverslips at a density of approximately 1-2...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Timeaaaaaaaaaa
Timeaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

The invention relates to a method of excysting and growing protozoal oocysts by in vitro tissue culture resulting in production of a continuous culture of merozoites. The invention also provides an economical and reliable supply of cultured Eimeria sp. for vaccine production, assays and research. Domesticated avians that have been vaccinated using the provied Eimeria sp. are also provided.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is a non-provisional application that claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 60 / 382,428, filed May 21, 2002, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entries.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The invention relates to culture systems and methods for the continuous culture of sporocyst-forming protozoa of the class Sporozoea and genera and species thereof. The invention also relates to merozoites and oocysts and related-Sporozoea life-stage cells produced by the inventive culture systems and methods, for use in vaccines, assays, and for other uses.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]The protozoa of the class Sporozoea include sporocyst-forming protozoa, many of which are etiologic in a myriad of diseases of animals and people around the world. Of particular commercial concern are the diseases caused by Sporozoea of the subclass Coccidia, order Eucoccidiida and sub...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
IPC IPC(8): C12P1/02C12N1/14A61K39/00C12Q1/02A61K39/002A61K39/012A61K39/38A61P33/02C12N1/10
CPCA61K39/012C12N1/10A61K2039/52A61P33/02A61P37/00Y02A50/30
Inventor ELLISON, SIOBHAN P.
Owner PATHOGENES
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products