Impact resistant structure for the helicopter and energy absorber used for the same

Abstract

An impact resistant structure of a helicopter having an energy absorber positioned under a floor of the helicopter and directly connected to a cabin frame of the helicopter. The energy absorber is arranged in accordance with a distribution of a ground reaction force on a general ground at a time of crash situation. The energy absorber also includes a plurality of independent hollow tubes of fiber reinforced composite material integrally formed by bundling only the hollow tubes. The hollow tubes are arranged so as to reduce a number of intersecting wall surfaces of the hollow tubes.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]1. Field of the Invention[0002]The present invention relates to an impact resistant structure for a helicopter and an energy absorber used for the same.[0003]2. Description of the Related Art[0004]A helicopter is often operated in visual flight rule, or between mountains, or at a low altitude, because of its operating characteristics. Then, there is always a risk of accident due to contact with an obstacle. Therefore, an impact resistance is strongly required in a helicopter in order to keep survivability of crew members in the crash situations.[0005]The basic principle for the impact resistant structure of a helicopter is to adopt a continuous strong keel K for a nose H easily crushed and a bottom G easily crushed which are shown in FIG. 16(a) to prevent a floor D from structural failure on crash landing as shown in FIG. 16(b), to adopt a strong outer skin P as shown in FIG. 16(c), to adopt a strong beam B on the keel K, and to adopt a continuous st...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The solution provides enhanced energy absorption capacity, reduces harmful initial load peaks, and increases effective stroke, ensuring improved survivability and impact resistance in crash scenarios while maintaining structural integrity and crew safety.

Problems solved by technology

Then, there is always a risk of accident due to contact with an obstacle.

“Full-Scale Crash Test of the Sikorsky Advanced Composite Airframe Program Helicopter” Richard L. Botinott, AHS 56th), the web intersection part X is hard to be crushed, and the sub-floor effective stroke is not effectively utilized, so that a sufficient floor acceleration reduction is not realized.

However, to reduce an impact load by a long absorption stroke, and simultaneously, to realize high impact energy absorption of the merit of a fiber reinforced composite material tube without instability of overall general buckling, if the section of the single tube is simply made larger, the local buckling tendency of the tube wall will be increased and the stable progressive failure mode suitable for impact energy absorption of fiber reinforced composite tube shown in FIG. 20 cannot be achieved.

Further, when a foaming material is filled in all the sections, a space for releasing destroyed small pieces of the composite material generated in the progressive failure mode is lost, and the destroyed small pieces are compacted, and the energy absorber will become extremely stiffened.

Thereby, the effective stroke is reduced, and a required impact absorption capability is not obtained.

Further, to reduce the local unstable buckling of the tube wall, when the section size of the tube is made compact, the aspect ratio (energy absorber height / section width) of whole the energy absorber becomes long and slim, and the energy absorber becomes weak for bending and eccentric compression, so a desired axial compression energy absorption property cannot be achieved.

As a solution for these problems, when the section of the tube is made compact, and is made into a bundling shape, when the number of tubes is optionally adjusted, the number of intersections between stiff walls increases as the number of tubes increases, so that as shown in FIG. 21, the initial load peak level harmful for the impact absorption property increases.

Images