Methods of washing cellulose-rich solids from biomass fractionation to reduce lignin and ash content

Abstract

The present invention provides a process for fractionating lignocellulosic biomass, comprising: digesting a biomass feedstock in the presence of a solvent for lignin, an acid, and water, to produce cellulose-rich solids; separating and washing the cellulose-rich solids with a wash solvent; washing the cellulose-rich solids with water, to generate washed cellulose-rich solids and a wash liquor comprising fines, wherein the wash liquor is introduced to or in contact with a classifier to remove the fines; and separating the fines and recycling the remaining water. The classifier may include a screen with mesh size in the range of 10 to 500, such as 200. The washed cellulose-rich solids will typically have a lower Kappa number (lignin content) and ash content compared to cellulose-rich solids from a process without a classifier that removes fines.

Description

PRIORITY DATA[0001]This patent application is a non-provisional application claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Patent App. No. 61 / 905,938, filed Nov. 19, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.FIELD[0002]The present invention generally relates to fractionation processes for converting biomass into fermentable sugars, cellulose, and lignin, and for processes and apparatus to recover the lignin.BACKGROUND[0003]Biomass refining (or biorefining) is becoming more prevalent in industry. Cellulose fibers and sugars, hemicellulose sugars, lignin, syngas, and derivatives of these intermediates are being used by many companies for chemical and fuel production. Indeed, we now are observing the commercialization of integrated biorefineries that are capable of processing incoming biomass much the same as petroleum refineries now process crude oil. Underutilized lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks have the potential to be much cheaper than petroleum, on a carbon basis, as well a...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0047]In some embodiments, the washed cellulose-rich solids have a lower Kappa number compared to cellulose-rich solids from an otherwise-identical process without a classifier to remove at least a portion of the fines. In some embodiments, the second washed cellulose-rich solids have a lower ash content compared to cellulose-rich solids from an otherwise-identical process without a classifier to remove at least a portion of the fines. In some embodiments, the second washed cellulose-rich solids have a lower hemicellulose content compared to cellulose-rich solids from an otherwise-identical process without a classifier to remove at least a portion of the fines.

Problems solved by technology

Approximately half of the starting biomass is essentially wasted in this manufacturing process.

State-of-the-art biomass-pretreatment approaches typically can produce high yields of hemicellulose sugars but suffer from moderate cellulose and lignin yields.

These are both high-temperature processes that intentionally destroy sugars in biomass.

This is a difficult task because lignin and hemicelluloses are bound to each other by covalent bonds, and the three components are arranged inside the fiber wall in a complex manner.

When the sugars in lignocellulosics are used as feedstock for fermentation, the process to open up the cell wall structure is often called “pretreatment.” Pretreatment can significantly impact the production cost of lignocellulosic ethanol.

One of the most challenging technical obstacles for cellulose has been its recalcitrance towards hydrolysis for glucose production.

Because of the high quantity of enzymes typically required, the enzyme cost can be a tremendous burden on the overall cost to turn cellulose into glucose for fermentation.

Cellulose can be made to be reactive by subjecting biomass to severe chemistry, but that would jeopardize not only its integrity for other potential uses but also the yields of hemicellulose and lignin.

It is difficult to avoid degradation of sugars.

Also, in common acidic pretreatment approaches, lignin handling is very problematic because acid-condensed lignin precipitates and forms deposits on surfaces throughout the process.

When high sugar yields are desired, however, there is a problem.

Traditional ethanol / water pulping cannot give high yields of hemicellulose sugars because the timescale for sufficient hydrolysis of hemicellulose to monomers causes soluble-lignin polymerization and then precipitation back onto cellulose, which negatively impacts both pulp quality as well as cellulose enzymatic digestibility.

Images