Slurry dewatering and conversion of biosolids to a renewable fuel

Abstract

In the processes for treating municipal sewage and storm water containing biosolids to discharge standards, biosolids, even after dewatering, contain typically about 80% water bound in the dead cells of the biosolids, which gives biosolids a negative heating value. It can be incinerated only at the expense of purchased fuel. Biosolids are heated to a temperature at which their cell structure is destroyed and, preferably, at which carbon dioxide is split off to lower the oxygen content of the biosolids. The resulting char is not hydrophilic, and it can be efficiently dewatered and / or dried and is a viable renewable fuel. This renewable fuel can be supplemented by also charging conventional biomass (yard and crop waste, etc.) in the same or in parallel facilities. Similarly, non-renewable hydrophilic fuels can be so processed in conjunction with the processing of biosolids to further augment the energy supply.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0001] Sludge from sewage and wastewater treatment plants, and the biosolids it contains, represents a serious disposal problem. The Water Environment Federation (WEF) formally recognized the term “biosolids” in 1991, and it is now in common use throughout the world. The WEF defines “biosolids” as the soil-like residue of materials removed from sewage during the wastewater treatment process. During treatment, bacteria and other tiny organisms break sewage down into simpler and more stable forms of organic matter. The organic matter, combined with bacterial cell masses, settles out to form biosolids. According to USEPA, biosolids that meet treatment and pollutant content criteria “can be safely recycled and applied as fertilizer to sustainably improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth”. [0002] The sludge is a mixture of biosolids (comprised primarily of dead organic cells which are a by-product of treating sewage and wastewater so that it...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0023] For example, in combination with a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), the present invention provides a method to produce a viable, renewable fuel from biosolids by converting the biosolids into a relatively dry, combustible material. In many cases, the process can be integrated with the existing infrastructure of the WWTP. Since the treated biosolids have substantially no bound water, freed water from the cells can be returned to the WWTP. The remaining cell materials become much less hydrophilic, which gives them a positive heating value and allows them to be shipped to the desired destination at a much reduced cost. If the WWTP is equipped with an anaerobic digestion stage, the gas produced can support the fluid deoxidation with fuel used in its operation. Pathogens are destroyed, and when the dewatered biosolids are heated sufficiently to carbonize them, the resulting char product contains reduced levels of most water-soluble impurities, including sodium, potassium, sulfur, nitrogen, chlorine and organic compounds, which are separated with the excess water. Biosolids char is a new player on the energy scene and is a low-cost, renewable fuel for many energy-consuming industries.

[0048] Thus, the present invention provides a method for the disposal of sludge generated at sewage and wastewater treatment plants in an economical and environmentally benign manner. The method is economically benign because the end product is ash that is free of odors, as well as harmful substances such as viruses or pathogens, and the ash has a small volume and is readily disposed of. The method is further economically viable because at the front end it benefits from the willingness of treatment plant operators to pay a tipping fee in order to dispose of the difficult-to-handle sewage sludge, and further because, at the other end of the cycle, the sludge will have been converted into a fuel with a positive heating value that can be used to generate further revenue or other items of value in the form of payments for the generated heat energy or, for example, trading the extracted heat for credits, desired products and the like.

Problems solved by technology

Hydro-electric and geothermal have limited new sites and face ecological opposition.

Landfill gas is limited and also criticized for air pollution.

There are currently no other renewable sources which might be tapped to fill the large gap between supply and demand.

For example, wood and forestry, as well as agricultural, by-products have been used as fuels for centuries by mechanically firing them in furnaces and boilers with high excess air and low efficiency.

Due to their large bound water content, biosolids have a negative fuel value and cannot be incinerated unless heated with expensive fuel that must be purchased.

The cost of shipping the inert water limits the distance it can be moved from its source, usually a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).

As the options for biosolids disposal become more challenging and the disposal options are moved farther from the source, disposal costs and transportation costs have become increasingly significant economic burdens.

Nevertheless, such mechanical dewatering methods used by WWTPs are inefficient and costly and incapable of appreciably reducing the amount of water bound in the cells of the biosolids.

For example, environmentalists condemn the use of biosolids as a fertilizer because of their content of living disease-causing organisms (pathogens and viruses) and heavy metals (such as lead, mercury, cadmium, zinc and nickel), as well as their damage to groundwater quality.

Furthermore, the high cell-bound water content of biosolids makes their incineration difficult for many industries.

Since their net fuel value is negative, this practice is only viable because of the revenue received by the kiln operator, for example, from the tipping fee, since additional fuel, such as coal, must be fired to eliminate the water bound in biosolids.

In addition, in the manufacture of cement, certain elements contained in biosolids, such as chlorine, phosphorus, sodium and potassium, are not desired because they adversely affect the quality of the cement.

Attempts to extract energy from such materials were limited to combusting low-grade fuels and solid waste.

However, they all have been forced to contend with the fact that biosolids contain about four times as much water as solid material, even after conventional dewatering at the treatment plant, for example.

As the foregoing demonstrates, the disposal of biosolids has become increasingly expensive and controversial.

Images