Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Thin, double-wall molded seat frame system

a seat frame and double-wall technology, applied in the field of vehicular seats, can solve the problems of large mass of steel seat frame, large weight of molded seat frame, and large molding thickness of molded seat frame, and achieve the effect of facilitating the incorporation of reinforcement structure and good structural performan

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-08-04
GLANCE PATRICK M +1
View PDF12 Cites 110 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0043] Another advantage of the present invention is that the seat frame pan and seat back are formed in two cavity halves, which are molded together to form a closed box section. It is desired that the walls of the two cavities, in each case, are relatively thin (typically about 1 mm) and hence flexible, with internal, molded standoffs reinforcing the outer walls when the two cavities are joined together. Notwithstanding the extremely thin walls, the seat frame pan and seat back provide good structural performance.
[0044] The seat frame pan and seat back can be formed from a number of different manufacturing processes, such as injection molding, twin sheet vacuum forming, vacuum die casting, casting, or compression molding. The seat frame pan may be formed of a number of different materials, such as high density polyethylene, polypropylene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polycarbonate, sheet molding compound, PBT, PET, or metal such as magnesium, zinc alloy, or aluminum. Talc filled HDPE is typical. The seat back can be made of comparable materials.
[0045] As shown in FIG. 10, the formation of the seat back in two sections also facilitates incorporation of the reinforcement structure formed of metal. In such a case, the reinforcement cavity 20 can be formed between the front and back sections, with the reinforcement member in the form of tower 18 or 24 being positioned between the front and back sections before the back sections are welded or bonded together. The tower and other similar metal members for attachment or other purposes can thus be incorporated into the seat frame or seat back during the manufacturing process, thus facilitating attachment of the seat frame assembly to a vehicle. It should be understood that the reinforcement tower or other reinforcement member does not have to be inserted in the mold cavity prior to joining the two molded halves. Instead, the reinforcement member could be inserted after the product has been formed and attached by interference fit, adhesion, or mechanical fasteners. Even when the tower is inserted into the mold when the sections are attached together, such fasteners may be used to maintain the position of the tower in the seat back or the like.
[0046] It will be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art and by those who practice the invention, that various modifications and improvements may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosed concept. Various relational terms, including left, right, front, back, top, and bottom, for example, are used in the

Problems solved by technology

Front bucket seat pans (a lower seat frame utilized to mount a seat lower cushion) are commonly stamped steel with a steel seat spring suspension, although a technology limitation of steel seating frames is their large mass.
Some seat frames utilize aluminum or magnesium, which has lighter mass, but is more expensive.
A technology limitation of molded seat frames is their relatively large molding thickness, typically about 3 mm with ranges from about 6 to about 2 mm.
The large molding thickness results in a slow molding cycle time, and greater material usage, which directly results in a higher seat frame cost.
This is a technology limitation and natural consequence of plastic seat frames.
These technology limitations have resulted in steel seat back frames weighing 6 to 8 pounds and costing $8 to $12, while steel bucket seat frame assemblies weigh between 4 to 6 pounds, and cost between $4 to $6.
Molded seat frames are typically expensive compared to steel frames, but are utilized for specialty, niche applications where the molded surface doubles as a styling show surface, a load floor, or is utilized to reduce mass in conjunction with metal reinforcement.
Molded seat frames often have a lower mass than their steel counterparts, at a higher cost.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Thin, double-wall molded seat frame system
  • Thin, double-wall molded seat frame system
  • Thin, double-wall molded seat frame system

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0027] A preferred embodiment of a thin, double wall molded seat frame system according to the invention is generally shown in the drawing figures and discussed below.

[0028] Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a double wall seat frame assembly 10 constructed in accordance with the present invention. Seat frame assembly includes a seat back 12, a seat pan 14 and a recliner mechanism 16 interconnecting the seat back and seat frame. The recliner mechanism is known.

[0029] A reinforcement tower 18 extends through an internal cavity 20 on one side of the seat back. In FIG. 1, tower 18 is a restraint tower for a seat that incorporates an integral restraint system, wherein the safety belt is attached directly to the seat back. A seat belt retractor housing 22 is mounted on the top of tower 18. Where an integral restraint system is not employed, a conventional reinforcement tower 24 (FIG. 13) is employed instead of the longer restraint tower 18. The shorter reinforce...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A seat frame for a vehicle or other seating comprises a seat back and a seat pan formed of molded double wall members having thin, substantially closed exterior walls and a substantially open interior. The exterior walls include front and back sections having a cavity therebetween, secured together to form a hollow, box beam type of structure. Integrally formed, spaced cup-shaped standoffs extend between the front and back sections between side walls thereof and provide internal reinforcement of the seat member between the side walls. The seat back includes a cavity for a seat back reinforcement member for either a restraint or non-restraint seat.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is based on and claims the benefit of the filing date of co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61 / 237,926, entitled Thin, Double-Wall Molded Seat Frame System and filed on Oct. 4, 2000, by Patrick M. Glance and Bradley M. Glance, the disclosure of which is incorporated here by reference.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] The invention relates to vehicular seating generally and more particularly to a new vehicular seat frame. [0003] Today automotive seat frames, for example, are constructed from a number of materials and manufacturing technologies. Most seat frames and seat backs are fabricated from steel tubing. Front bucket seat pans (a lower seat frame utilized to mount a seat lower cushion) are commonly stamped steel with a steel seat spring suspension, although a technology limitation of steel seating frames is their large mass. Some seat frames utilize aluminum or magnesium, which has lighter mas...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): A47C7/02B60N2/68
CPCB60N2/68
Inventor GLANCE, PATRICK M.GLANCE, BRADLEY M.
Owner GLANCE PATRICK M
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products