Apart from the actual laundering cycles, i. e. for example, the washing and extract cycles, a substantial amount of time is consumed in loading large quantities of items to be laundered into the laundry machine.
Unfortunately, the prior art arrangement disclosed in the aforesaid '772 patent does not appreciably shorten the loading
cycle time.
Moreover, since typically as many as six 200 pound slings of launderable items can be required to fill a commercial
washer, sequencing of the slings to the unloading position and directing the items into the laundry machine can be very
time consuming.
Use of loading hoppers in conventional commercial laundry machines, furthermore, has been problem prone.
Items introduced into the hopper during loading can catch upon or fall behind the splash door, which can impede its operation.
Items also can hang up in the hopper and the splash door if water is not continually sprayed down the hopper to assist in moving the items into the drum, which can result in raising the liquid within the drum above the programmed level and necessitate a drainage cycle prior to start of washing.
Moreover, during the extract cycle of operation, i. e. the high speed spin cycle that forces liquid from laundered items following a wash cycle, the machine can experience extensive vibrations, particularly if the laundry load becomes out of balance.
Indeed, during the extract cycle, items rotating within the laundry machine can be exposed to forces up to 300 times gravity, While it is known to support the laundry machine on inflated bags during the extract cycle for better isolating the machine from the floor, since the hopper is mounted on the laundry machine, it still can be subjected to such severe vibrations as to cause
structural failure to the hopper, or its support and actuating mechanisms.
Problems further have been incurred in maintaining the hopper in a securely closed and sealed condition against the laundry machine housing during the washing operation as is necessary in order to prevent leakage of the washing fluid.
Such
cam actuated devices tend to over compress the
gasket causing a permanent set.
The cams also can incur wear.
The combined effect is that over time the
cam locking devices can develop a looseness to the extent that leakage about the door can occur and machine vibrations ultimately can cause the loose camming device to forcefully strike and break adjacently mounted proximity switches intended to monitor the locked condition of the hopper.
Since the loading hoppers of conventional laundry machines are relatively massive, problems further have been incurred in reliably raising the hopper to an unloading position following a laundry cycle.
While it is desirable to pivot the hopper at least 90 degrees away from the front face of the laundry machine so as not to impede the
discharge of items during unloading, heretofore this has required costly and complex operating mechanisms.
For example, proposals for raising the hopper by means of large actuating cylinders mounted in front of the laundry machine impede access to the machine and movement of unloading conveyors in front of the laundry machine.
Efforts to locate actuating cylinders on the machine itself, and at locations that do not impede access to the machine or increase the floor
footprint or height of the machine, have not been found to be effective or reliable in lifting and retaining the heavy hopper unit.