Simple surgical anti-splashing device

Abstract

The invention provides a simple surgical anti-splashing device which comprises a bracket and a membrane body. The membrane body is provided with two operation openings and one air guide opening, the membrane body is connected with the bracket, and a sealing cover is arranged outside the bracket. The simple surgical anti-splashing device can quickly provide first-line medical staff with isolated surgical space, and the risk of infection is reduced; and the secondary pollution caused by the operation in front of a hospital bed is reduced, and a pollution source is limited inside an isolation device as much as possible.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the field of medical protection devices, in particular to a simple operation splash prevention device. Background technique [0002] In surgical scenarios with high exposure risk (such as tracheotomy for patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia, chest surgery for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, etc.), surgical operations will bring risks of aerosol exposure or blood contamination. This situation brings huge challenges to the safety protection of surgical operations. Even if there are sufficient safety protection facilities, the operator needs to wear protective glasses or positive pressure protective masks, which will have a significant impact on the surgical field of view. In grass-roots hospitals, under the condition of insufficient biosafety protection, patients are likely to lose the opportunity to undergo surgery under protected conditions; and when emergency surgery has to be performed, medical staff face a huge ri...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0012] (5), a post-tracheotomy anti-pollution cover (CN 209696010 U), and a similar post-tracheotomy anti-sputum splash protection cover (CN 206587252 U), which adopt a transparent cover with a perforated design or belt The tubes are used for postoperative antifouling, not suitable for intraoperative use

[0013] In the prior art, for the protection of medical personnel, N95 masks, protective clothing, protective glasses and positive pressure protective masks are used. The disadvantages are: the positive pressure protective mask equipment is expensive and the configuration is small; Mirrors, etc. will also be in short supply; for the isolation of surgical operation space, if negative pressure wards are used, the disadvantages are: the number of negative pressure wards is limited, and there is no configuration in primary hospitals or field conditions

[0014] The biggest problem with the existing surgical operation methods is that it will cause exposure risks to medical staff, including aerosols, respiratory secretions, and blood contamination. For high-risk scenarios (such as coronavirus pneumonia), extremely high safety protection measures are required, such as negative Pressure wards, N95 masks, protective clothing, protective glasses / positive pressure protective masks, etc., such safety protection conditions are often difficult to meet at the grassroots level

[0015] At present, there is still a lack of an effective, simple and practical isolation protection device that can quickly provide additional protection for front-line medical staff and reduce the risk of infection

Images