Endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument

Abstract

The invention relates to an endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument. The endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument comprises an electric knife electrocoagulator, an A type separatingdissector, a B type separating dissector and an endoscope sheath. The endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument has the advantages that a surgical instrument combination for treating secondary deformity after endoscope-assisted axillary fossa augmentation mammoplasty is improved, a novel approach of treating the secondary deformity after the augmentation mammoplasty and a novel surgical method of the approach are established, and high-accuracy and higher-efficiency surgery is facilitated; surgical trauma and blooding amount are reduced, the controllability of surgical operation is improved, surgical complications are reduced and surgical curative effect and the satisifaction of patients are improved; the endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument meeting novel requirementsof precision medicine can become a novel mechanical instrument and has a broad prospect in clinical popularization.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of medical instruments, in particular to an endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument. Background technique [0002] Breast augmentation is one of the common cosmetic procedures. Secondary deformity and fibrocapsular contracture after breast augmentation are common complications of breast augmentation. Surgical treatment is the main method and means to treat the above common complications. The operation technique involves the release of the fibrous capsule, the incision of the fibrous capsule, the partial or complete resection of the fibrous capsule, and the suture of the fibrous capsule. The routine approach of surgery is through the areola or inferior crease incision. The axillary approach is a common approach for breast augmentation surgery, but there is currently no relevant suitable equipment, and it is impossible to complete the operation and treatment of secondary deformities after breast a...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

The axillary approach is a common approach for breast augmentation surgery, but there is currently no relevant suitable equipment, and it is impossible to complete the operation and treatment of secondary deformities after breast augmentation through the axillary approach

[0003] Some scholars introduced the use of the original incision approach (armpit) and two additional incisions to complete the minimally invasive examination and diagnosis of breast prosthesis leakage and the release of the fibrous capsule after the prosthesis was removed. Under the prosthesis, fibrocapsulotomy is performed, and fibrocystic release is performed under the condition of protecting the prosthesis, but these operations are not only difficult and challenging to operate, but also have many limitations:

[0004] First, additional auxiliary incisions need to be added, resulting in more scars, scar hyperplasia, and affecting the appearance of the body

[0005] Second, the approach for the treatment of secondary deformities after breast augmentation usually adopts the areola or lower fold approach. Under the existing equipment conditions, the transaxillary approach cannot successfully complete the operation and obtain ideal results

At the same time, since most breast augmentation operations in my country use the axillary approach, the second-stage operation changes the surgical approach and increases the scar at the same time, which is unacceptable to many patients.

Therefore, the existing technology usually completes the surgical operation through the areola approach or the inferior fold approach, and the axillary approach cannot complete the surgical operation with the existing technical conditions and existing equipment, and obtain satisfactory surgical results

[0006] Third, in the existing technology, if the operation is not performed under the endoscope, due to the poor operation plane, unclear layers, and inaccurate grasp of the structure, it often leads to some new postoperative complications and adverse effects

[0007] Fourth, the axillary approach is better than the areola approach and the lower fold approach in terms of surgical operability and tissue ductility, but the existing surgical instruments cannot meet the technical requirements and cannot obtain satisfactory results

An endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument that meets the new requirements of precision medicine, but there is no report on this endoscopic minimally invasive surgical instrument

Images