Combined determination method of chlorophyll content and proline content
A technology of chlorophyll content and determination method, which is applied in the field of joint determination of chlorophyll content and proline content, can solve problems such as environmental protection, cumbersome steps, and unsafety, and achieve the effects of reducing manpower and material resources, saving test materials, and saving manpower
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0028] The present invention provides a kind of joint determination method of chlorophyll content and proline content, and concrete operation steps are as follows:
[0029] 1. Extraction of chlorophyll and proline: Cut 0.2g of leaves into pieces, put them into a 10mL centrifuge tube, add 5mL of 95% ethanol, and soak in the dark for 12h to 72h (24h is the best). Gauze filtration, the filtrate is the extract of chlorophyll and proline.
[0030] 2. Determination of chlorophyll content: Dilute 1 mL of the extract N times with 95% ethanol, mix well, and pour it into a cuvette with an optical path of 1 cm. Using 95% ethanol as a blank, the absorbance was measured at wavelengths of 665nm, 649nm and 470nm.
[0031] Chlorophyll a concentration: C a =13.95A 665 -6.8A 649
[0032] Chlorophyll b concentration: C b =24.96A 649 -7.32A 665
[0033] Carotenoid Concentration:
[0034] After obtaining the concentration of the pigment, calculate the content of each pigment in the tis...
experiment example 1
[0087] 1. Both Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 used 4 leaves and 1 heart of Chinese cabbage leaves as materials, and the determination was repeated 3 times. The experimental data were analyzed statistically using SAS 9.1 software, and the t test was used for significant differences.
[0088] Table 2
[0089]
[0090] As can be seen from Table 2, t=0.30090.05(2) ), the chlorophyll content difference measured by embodiment 1 and the original method (comparative example 1) is not significant.
[0091] 2. Both Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 used 4 leaves and 1 heart of Chinese cabbage leaves as materials, and the determination was repeated 3 times. The experimental data were analyzed statistically using SAS 9.1 software, and the t test was used for significant differences.
[0092] table 3
[0093]
[0094] As can be seen from Table 3, t=0.61400.05(2) ), Example 1 and the proline content difference measured by the original method (comparative example 2) are not s...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com