Multiple-antenna device having an isolation element

Abstract

A multiple-antenna device is provided, comprising: a printed circuit board having a ground plane configured to provide electromagnetic isolation between a first side of the printed circuit board and a second side of the printed circuit board; a first non-conductive support member formed over the first side of the printed circuit board; a second non-conductive support member formed over the second side of the printed circuit board; a first antenna formed over the first non-conductive support member; and a second antenna formed over the second non-conductive support member, wherein the first antenna is electrically connected to a first feed point on a first portion of the printed circuit board that is not connected to the ground plane, and wherein the second antenna is electrically connected to a second feed point on a second portion of the printed circuit board that is not connected to the ground plane.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]The present invention is related to and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60 / 869,438, filed Dec. 11, 2006, entitled “METRO WIFI RF REPEATER,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.TECHNICAL FIELD[0002]The present invention relates generally to wireless communication and more specifically to an antenna configuration associated with a wireless repeater, the antenna configuration made up of closely packaged antennas having orthogonal polarization and isolation to reduce electromagnetic coupling and to provide high directivity.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]In a wireless communication node, such as a wireless repeater designed to operate with a wireless system capable of simultaneous transmission and reception of packets (i.e., duplex operation), the orientation of the antenna units can be important in establishing non-interfering operation as it is critical that the receiver is not desensitiz...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The present invention provides a multiple-antenna device formed in a printed circuit board. The device includes a ground plane that provides electromagnetic isolation between two antennas, and non-conductive support members between the antennas and the ground plane. The device also includes a first antenna, a second antenna, and a third antenna formed over the non-conductive support members. The first and second antennas are connected to different feed points on the printed circuit board. The technical effect of this invention is to provide a more efficient and reliable wireless communication device with multiple antennas that can be easily integrated into printed circuit boards.

Problems solved by technology

Furthermore, enclosing antenna modules and repeater circuitry within the same package is desirable for convenience, manufacturing cost reduction and the like, but such packaging can give rise to interference problems.

Additional problems arise however when packaging repeater antennae and circuitry in close proximity.

First, it becomes difficult to achieve high isolation between antennae due solely to the close physical proximity even where directional antennae are used.

Simply put, as the antennae are placed closer together, the more likely the antennae will couple energy into each other, which reduces the isolation between the sides of the repeater.

Maintaining an omni or semi-omni directional antenna pattern becomes difficult since overlapping radiation patterns of antennae which are placed close to each other tend to generate interference effects.

While the use of direction antenna can benefit the repeater in terms of increased range and reduced wireless signal variation due to Raleigh fading effects, directional antennas are not typically used for indoor applications, due to the requirement for directional alignment, which is beyond the capability or desire of the average user.

Such cancellation however can be expensive in that additional circuitry is required, and can be computationally expensive in that such cancellation can result in the introduction of a delay factor in the repeater or alternatively can require the use of more expensive and faster processors to perform the cancellation function.

Images