Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Check accepting and cash dispensing automated banking machine system and method

a technology of automatic banking machine and cash dispenser, which is applied in the field of automatic banking machines, can solve the problems of user's frequent incurring a "bad check" fee, further delays, and possible problems, and achieve the effect of reducing the likelihood of interference with acceptance and minimizing the risk of damage to the printing mechanism or the check

Active Publication Date: 2006-07-06
DIEBOLD NIXDORF
View PDF1 Cites 40 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0032] It is a further object of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention to provide a deposit accepting apparatus that has greater reliability.
[0065] Alternatively if the check is found to be suitable for acceptance, the check is moved from the escrow area past one or more stamper printers. The stamper printer is operative to apply ink marks to one or more surfaces of the check so as to indicate that the check has been cancelled. In an exemplary embodiment the check is thereafter moved into a vertically extending transport. As the check enters the vertical transport, printing is conducted on the check through operation of a suitable inkjet or other printer. Appropriate printing is applied to the check to indicate it has been cancelled as the check moves past the inkjet printer. In the exemplary embodiment the inkjet printer has aligned on an opposed side of the transport therefrom, an ink catcher mechanism. The ink catcher mechanism of the exemplary embodiment includes a movable head. The movable head includes an opening therein such that the opening may be aligned with the ink spraying nozzles on the head of the inkjet printer so as to receive ink therein that is not deposited on the check or other document. The exemplary embodiment of the movable head also includes a wiper. The head is moved through operation of a motor or other moving device at appropriate times so that the wiper engages the head of the inkjet printer so as to minimize the buildup of ink and contaminants thereon. This facilitates accurate printing and helps to minimize the risk of potential damage to checks by the accumulation of excess ink within the machine.

Problems solved by technology

Delays in crediting a user's account may be experienced due to delays in removing deposits from machines, as well as the time it takes to review deposited items and enter appropriate credits.
If the deposited items include instruments such as checks, further delays may be experienced.
In addition the user commonly incurs a “bad check” fee due to the cost associated with the institution having to handle a dishonored deposit.
All of these complications may result in delays and inconvenience to the user.
Another risk associated with conventional depositories in automated banking machines is that deposited items may be misappropriated.
Because deposited checks and other instruments are not cancelled at the time of receipt by the automated banking machine, they may be stolen from the machine and cashed by unauthorized persons.
Alternatively persons responsible for transporting items from the machine or persons responsible for verifying the items may misappropriate deposited instruments and currency.
Alternatively the handling required for transporting and verifying the contents of deposits may result in deposited instruments being lost.
Such circumstances can result in the user not receiving proper credit for deposited items.
While automated deposit accepting and processing devices provide many advantages and benefits, existing devices may also have drawbacks.
One drawback is that instruments must often be precisely aligned for purposes of reading micr coding or other indicia which is included on the instrument.
Sometimes this requires aligning the check against a stop, which may crease or tear the check.
A further drawback associated with some existing devices is that they are required to turn and reorient the deposited instrument.
The mechanisms for doing this can be complex.
Such complex mechanisms may encounter reliability problems due to the precise tolerances that must be maintained.
Further difficulty is added by the fact that instruments that are received may be creased, torn or soiled.
Handling such items may be difficult.
Instruments becoming jammed in such mechanisms may result in costly repairs and downtime.
A further drawback associated with some imaging systems in automated banking machines is that it is not practical to transmit an image of a deposited instrument for review and analysis at the time it is received.
A further drawback is that even when images may be transmitted sufficiently quickly, the operator of the system is required to invest in the resources necessary to analyze the transmitted image and make a determination as to whether the deposited item should be accepted as valid or not.
Providing such capabilities may be costly for the systems operator.
Advances in photocopy technology also may make it difficult for operators of such systems to distinguish between genuine items and reproductions.
As a result even with carefully operated and administered systems there is a risk that deposited items which are not genuine may be accepted.
As a result it has been difficult to achieve real time check verification and cashing in widely distributed systems.
Further, in some systems it is difficult to readily correlate an image file with the particular transaction with which the image file is associated.
There may also be concerns in some systems with regard to the integrity of system data.
For example there are risks that electronic image data representative of check images may be modified in order to carry out fraudulent activities.
However, such markings may render it impossible to prove the character of the original check as it was received.
A further drawback associated with some automated banking machine systems is that they cannot be used by individuals who do not have bank accounts.
This makes the use of automated banking machines generally unsuitable for persons who do not have bank accounts and / or cannot wait several days for deposited items to be verified and credited to their account.
A further drawback associated with some existing automated banking machine systems is that some operators of such systems may wish to retain the capability to accept deposits in the form of items such as envelopes as well as checks and other instruments.
Providing two separate depositories may add considerable cost and complexity to the machine.
While mechanisms which can accept both single sheet-like instruments as well as envelopes have been developed, such mechanisms are often complex and unreliable.
The capability of accepting both types of deposits is difficult to achieve because deposited instruments and envelopes may have varying thicknesses.
Such combined depositories may also suffer from having lower security capabilities than mechanisms which are designed to accept only one type of deposit.
This presents challenges for reliably handling such items.
Current depository mechanisms often do not have the capability of reliably handling or imaging such items.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Check accepting and cash dispensing automated banking machine system and method
  • Check accepting and cash dispensing automated banking machine system and method
  • Check accepting and cash dispensing automated banking machine system and method

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0170] Referring now to the drawings and particularly to FIG. 1, there is shown therein an exemplary embodiment of an automated banking machine 10 which includes an exemplary deposit accepting apparatus and which performs an exemplary methods of operation. Automated banking machine 10 is an ATM. However it should be understood that the inventive concepts disclosed herein may be used in connection with various types of automated banking machines and devices of other types. Automated banking machine 10 includes a user interface generally indicated 12. User interface 12 includes input and output devices. In the exemplary embodiment the input devices include a plurality of function buttons 14 through which a user may provide inputs to the machine. The exemplary input devices further include a keypad 16 through which a user may provide numeric or other inputs. A further input device in this exemplary embodiment includes a card reader schematically indicated 18. Card reader 18 may be of t...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

An automated banking machine system and method includes ATMs which accept checks and dispense cash to users. The ATMs are operated to acquire image and magnetic data from deposited checks to determine the genuineness of checks and the authority of a user to receive cash for such checks. Cash may be dispensed to the user from the ATM in exchange for the deposited check. The ATMs dispense cash responsive to communications with a transaction host.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This Application claims benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Applications 60 / 660,128 and 60 / 659,994 filed Mar. 9, 2005. [0002] This Application also claims benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Applications 60 / 677,805; 60 / 677,804; 60 / 677,846; and 60 / 677,767 filed May 3, 2005. [0003] This Application also claims benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Applications 60 / 678,091; 60 / 677,891; 60 / 678,102; and 60 / 678,094 filed May 4, 2005. [0004] This Application also claims benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application 60 / 678,916 filed May 6, 2005. [0005] This Application also claims benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 120 of application Ser. No. 11 / 168,028 filed Jun. 27, 2005 which claims benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Applications 60 / 584,532; 60 / 584,742; 60 / 584,578; and 60 / 584,622 all filed Jun. 29, 2004, and 60 / 678,916 filed May 6,...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G07F19/00G06F7/08
CPCG06Q20/042G06Q20/1085G07D11/0084G07F19/20G07D11/50
Inventor VANKIRK, THOMAS A.WASHINGTON, JON E.JONES, BRIANBESKITT, WILLIAM D.GRAEF, HARRY THOMASPETERS, DAVID A.BLACKFORD, DAMON J.BLACKSON, DALE H.LASKOWSKI, EDWARD L.MA, SONGTAOCREWS, TIMWARREN, WAYNEBROWN, MARTIN J.GALLOWAY, TODDTUROCY, KENNETHDOMINICK, DOUGLAS T.SMOLK, JASEN J.LUCAS, BRIAN E.LIGHTNER, BRADLEYMEEK, JAMESBARNETT, ROBERT W.RYAN, MIKEKAY, JAMES R.WARD, MARK A.BELL, VICTORMCCARTHY, WILLIAMPAHL, MATTHEWCARPENTER, KEITHDROZDA, LAURA
Owner DIEBOLD NIXDORF
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products