Portable electric driven compressed air gun

Abstract

A portable electric motor driven air gun powered by a power source. The motor is coupled to a lead screw, which drives a piston. The piston compresses air in a chamber producing high-pressure air. When sufficient energy is stored within the air stream by the piston a valve opens which releases the air to act on the projectile. The compressed air is used to push a projectile such as a paintball, an airsoft ball, a “bb”, or a pellet through a barrel. The lead screw is then reversed and the piston is reset for the next shot. The piston is preferably coupled to a feeding mechanism to facilitate positioning of the projectile for firing. The direction speed and operative modes of the gun are preferably controlled with an electric circuit. The power source is preferably rechargeable and allows the air gun to be operated completely independent from either a wall outlet or a compressed air supply.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This utility application is a continuation of copending nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 10 / 764,793, filed on Jan. 26, 2004, which is the nonprovisional application claiming priority from Provisional Application No. 60 / 477,591, filed on Jun. 12, 2003, and Provisional Application No. 60 / 517,069 filed on Nov. 3, 2003, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT [0002] Not Applicable REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING, A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER LISTING COMPACT DISK APPENDIX [0003] Not Applicable BACKGROUND OF INVENTION [0004] This invention relates to pneumatic guns, air rifles, pellet rifles, paintball guns and the like. Such pneumatic guns are typically driven by either hand cocked springs, compressed gas, or hand operated pumps. The disadvantages of these guns are outlined in more detail below. [0005] Air rifles have been around for many years and ha...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0018] In accordance with the present invention, a piston is driven by a lead screw, or other linear motion converter, to compress air within a cylinder. When the desired pressure is reached a valve is opened, or is allowed to open, releasing the high-pressure air toward a projectile and launching the projectile. An electric motor, which derives its power from a low impedance electrical source, preferably rechargeable batteries, is coupled, either directly or through, a reduction means to the lead screw creating a very simple and robust design. Additionally, the piston may be mechanically coupled to a bolt in order to force the bolt to move in turn with the movement of the piston. Accordingly, besides the objects and advantages of the portable electric air gun as described, several objects and advantages of the present invention are:

Problems solved by technology

Filling, transporting and using such a canister represents a significant inconvenience and burden for the user.

This further increases the cost and complexity of such an air gun.

Furthermore, these tanks store an incredible amount of energy which, if released suddenly through a tank fault, could represent a significant safety factor.

Disposable cartridges, which can be used in less costly air guns, significantly increase refuse issues.

All of these patents still suffer from the major inconvenience and potential safety hazard of storing a large volume of highly compressed gas within the air gun.

Additionally, as they combine electronic control with the propulsion method of stored compressed gas, the inherent complexity of the mechanism increases, thus, increasing cost and reliability issues.

While this addresses the ability of multiple modes of fire, it does not solve the fundamental propulsion problem associated with gas cylinders and, in addition, it is expensive and complicated.

Problems with this method include the need to “cock” the spring between shots.

Thus, it is only suitable for single shot devices and is limited to very slow rates of fire.

Furthermore, the spring results in a double recoil effect when it is released.

Additionally, the spring air rifles require a significant amount of maintenance and, if dry-fired, the mechanism can be damaged.

Finally, the effort required for such “cocking” is often substantial and can be difficult for many individuals.

While this innovation solves the problem of cocking effort, the resulting air rifle still suffers from a complicated mechanism, double recoil and maintenance issues associated with the spring piston system.

Again, the use of indirect means to store the electrical energy in a spring before release to the piston to push the projectile results in an inefficient and complicated assembly.

Furthermore, the springs in such systems are highly stressed mechanical elements that are prone to breakage and which increase the weight of the air gun.

In this case, the device is for non-portable operation.

The third technique, using a hand pump to pressurize the air, is often used on low end devices and suffers from the need to pump the air gun between 2 to 10 times to build up enough air supply for sufficient projectile velocity.

This again limits the air rifle or paintball gun to slow rates of fire.

While this solves the obvious problem of manually pumping a chamber up in order to fire a gun, these devices suffer from the inability to store sufficient energy in the air stream.

Solenoids are inefficient devices and can only convert very limited amounts of energy due to their operation.

Furthermore, since the air stream is coupled directly to the projectile in this technique, the projectile begins to move as the air is being compressed.

This limits the ability of the solenoid to store energy in the air stream to a very short time period and further relegates its use to low energy air rifles.

This results in a very energetic piston mass similar to that shown in spring piston designs and further results in the undesirable double recoil effect as the piston mass must come to a halt.

Additionally, this technique suffers from dry-fire in that the air is compressed between the piston and the projectile.

A missing projectile allows the air to communicate to the atmosphere through the barrel and can damage the mechanism in a dry-fire scenario.

Although this solves the issue of sufficient power, it is no longer considered an air rifle as it becomes a combustion driven gun.

Moreover, it suffers from the aforementioned disadvantages including complexity and difficulty in controlling the firing sequence.

Although this solves the issue of double recoil, it is not suitable to a portable system due to inefficiencies of compressing air and the large tank volume required.

When air is used in this fashion, it compresses via adiabatic means, but the heat of compression is dissipated due to the large volume of air and the subsequent storage in a tank.

In order to overcome the variation in air pressure, further expense and complexity in terms of valving and regulators must be added.

Again, due to the large volume of air between the compression means and the projectile, much of the heat of compression is lost leading to a very inefficient operation.

Additionally, this patent teaches of a continuously operating device which suffers from a significant lock time (time between trigger pull and projectile leaving the barrel) as well as the inability to run in a semiautomatic or single shot mode.

Further disadvantages of this device include the pulsating characteristics of the air stream which are caused by the release and reseating of the check valve during normal operation.

Limitations of this approach include difficulty in achieving high projectile velocity since the transfer of energy must be done extremely rapidly between the impacting hammer and the projectile.

Additionally, this method suffers from the need to absorb a significant impact as the solenoid plunger must stop and return for the next projectile.

Since the solenoid plunger represents a significant fraction of the moving mass (i.e. it often exceeds the projectile weight) this type of system is very inefficient and limited to low velocity, low energy air guns as may be found in toys and the like.

The spring is “cocked” via an electric motor, but again, this does not overcome the prior mentioned limitations.

All of the currently available devices suffer from a number of disadvantages, some of which include: 1.

Difficult operation.

Cocking or pumping air rifles can be time consuming and a physical chore.

Significant inconvenience in the refilling transport and use of high-pressure gas cylinders.

Traditional air rifles at carnivals and the like are tethered to a compressed air supply or due to inefficient compressor operation require a large power source such as a wall outlet.

Complicated mechanisms and air porting schemes leading to potentially expensive production costs and reliability issues.

Inefficient usage and / or coupling of the compressed air to the projectile resulting in low energy projectiles and large energy input requirements.

Images