Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Carpet, carpet backings and methods

a technology for applied in the field of carpet backings and carpets, can solve the problems of reducing the recyclability of carpets, urethane backing systems also have important effects, and typical latex adhesive backing systems do not provide moisture barrier,

Inactive Publication Date: 2004-04-29
BRUMBELOW JULIE +7
View PDF99 Cites 49 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

"This patent is about a method of making carpets with a flexible ethylene polymer backing material. The invention relates to a carpet and a method of making a carpet by extrusion coating a primary backing material with at least one homogeneously branched linear ethylene polymer. The invention also includes tufted carpets and non-tufted carpets, such as needle punched carpets. The adhesive backing material is applied to the back side of the primary backing material to affix the yarn to it. The secondary backing material is optionally applied to enhance the carpet's dimensional stability and allow for the application of direct glue-down adhesives. The invention provides carpets with good wear resistance, abrasion resistance, flexibility, and easy installation."

Problems solved by technology

Third, some carpet styles include both loop and cut pile.
As one important drawback, typical latex adhesive backing systems do not provide a moisture barrier.
Another possible drawback, particularly with a carpet having polypropylene yarn and polypropylene primary and secondary backing materials, is the dissimilar polymer of latex systems along with the inorganic filler can reduce the recyclability of the carpet.
However, urethane backing systems also have important drawbacks, including their relatively high cost and demanding curing requirements which necessitate application at slow carpet production rates relative to latex systems.
However, using polyolefins to replace latex adhesive backings can also present difficulties.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,530, Table A at Col. 10, indicates that ordinary polyolefin resins possess inadequate adhesion for use in carpet construction.
Additionally, relative to latex and other cured systems, ordinary polyolefins have relatively high application viscosities and relatively high thermal requirements.
High recrystallization temperatures result in relatively short molten times during processing and, combined with high melt viscosities can make it difficult to achieve adequate penetration of the yam, especially at conventional adhesive backing application rates.
Unfortunately, hot melt adhesive systems are generally considered not completely suitable replacements for conventional latex adhesive backings.
Typical hot melt systems based on EVA and other copolymers of ethylene and unsaturated comonomers can require considerable formulating and yet often yield inadequate tuft bind strengths.
However, the most significant deficiency of typical hot melt system is their melt strengths which are generally too low to permit application by a direct extrusion coating technique.
As such, polyolefin hot melt systems are typically applied to primary backings by relatively slow, less efficient techniques such as by the use of heated doctor blades or rotating melt transfer rollers.
While unformulated high pressure low density polyethylene (LDPE) can be applied by a conventional extrusion coating technique, LDPE resins typically have poor flexibility which can result in excessive carpet stiffness.
Conversely, those ordinary polyolefins that have improved flexibility, such as ultra low density polyethylene (ULDPE) and ethylene / propylene interpolymers, still do not possess sufficient flexibility, have excessively low melt strengths and / or tend to draw resonate during extrusion coating.
To overcome extrusion coating difficulties, ordinary polyolefins with sufficient flexibility can be applied by lamination techniques to insure adequate yarn-to-backing adhesion; however, lamination techniques are typically expensive and can result in extended production rates relative to direct extrusion coating techniques.
However, the preferred TREF technique does not include purge quantities in SCBDI or CDBI calculations.
That is, polyolefin polymer mixtures can involve sufficiently similar polymer chemistries, compatibilities, and / or miscibilities to permit good recyclability without having sufficient similarities to permit integral fusion.
In addition, because it is not relied on for encapsulating or penetrating the fiber bundles, a resin of lower quality and / or less tightly controlled properties may be used in the second layer.
Two high pressure LDPE, a heterogeneously branched LLDPE, and a heterogeneously branched ULDPE extrusion coating (Comparative Runs 9-12) resulted in relatively stiff carpet samples and relatively poor carpet component cohesiveness.
One indication of poor component cohesiveness was relatively low adhesiveness of the backing material to the primary backing material.
That is, lower extrusion temperatures will generally require slower extrusion line speeds to achieve good penetration of the yarn.
Practitioners will also appreciate that excessive chemical stabilization may adversely effect draw down performance, thus additive selection and concentration must be balanced against draw down requirements and penetration requirements.
The high pressure LDPE extrusion coating resin resulted in stiff carpet with poor component cohesiveness.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Carpet, carpet backings and methods
  • Carpet, carpet backings and methods
  • Carpet, carpet backings and methods

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

examples 118-122

[0223] As a simulation of extrusion coating, a compression molding method was developed to melt plaques of candidate resins on to the backside of greige goods. This method employs a programmable press. The following lists the procedure.

[0224] Ethylene polymer pellets granules or powder were pressed into plaques weighing approximately 16 grams and having a thickness of 0.025 inches (0.64 mm). The press used was a pneumatic Tetrahedron programmable press. The polymer pellets, granules or powder were placed between Mylar brand polyester film in the desired plaque mold and preheated for 30 seconds at 374.degree. F. (190.degree. C.) (this was accomplished by inserting the samples into the pre-heated press and closing the platens sufficiently to allow for heating of the polymer sample without compressing it). After 30 seconds, the platens were completely closed and the Tetrahedron program was started. The program provided 2 tons (1,814 kg) compression at 374.degree. F. (190.degree. C.) fo...

examples 123-131

[0228] To measure the adhesion of candidate ethylene polymers to greige good squares, the compression lamination method described for Examples 118-122 was used. Peel strengths were then measured using an Instron set at a 25 mm / minute cross-head speed.

[0229] Table 13 gives adhesion results for various homogeneously branched ethylene polymers, high pressure LDPE, heterogeneously branched ULDPE, heterogeneously branched LLDPE, and HDPE laminated to squares made from polypropylene carpet greige goods.

12TABLE 13 Adhesion Strength, lbs. Example Resin (kg) 123 E 7.83 (3.6) 124 B 4.82 (2.2) 125 C 1.77 (0.8) 126 G 3.19 (1.4) 127 I 4.73 (2.1) 128* P 0.40 (0.2) 129* N 1.60 (0.7) 130* O 1.41 (0.6) 131* M 1.79 (0.8) 132* Q 0.49 (0.2) *Denotes Comparative Run Example; the example is not an example of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.

[0230] These Examples show that homogeneously branched substantially linear ethylene polymers and homogeneously branched linear ethylene polymers pro...

examples 133-141

[0236] To indicate the relative ability of candidate ethylene polymers to penetrate carpet yarn or fiber bundles at reasonable processing temperatures and thereby provide good carpet performance, solidification temperature testing was performed. In this test, candidate ethylene polymers were tested in the Temperature Sweep mode on a Rheometrics Mechanical Spectrometer 800E (S / N 035-014) fitted with a cone / cylinder fixture. The dimensions of the fixture were 52 mm (cup inside diameter).times.50 mm (bob outside diameter).times.17 mm (bob height).times.0.04 (cone angle). The gap between the bob and cup was calibrated to 50 .mu.m.+-.2 .mu.m at room temperature and zero gap at 220.degree. C. Samples were loaded into the cup and heated until molten. The gap was set to 50 .mu.m.+-.2 .mu.m as soon as the bob was pushed in. Any excess amount of samples or overflow was cleaned away. The solidification measurement was initiated when the tool temperature reached 220.degree. C. The cup was oscil...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention pertains to carpet and method of making it. In one aspect, the carpet includes (a) a primary backing which has a face and a back surface, (b) a plurality of fibers attached to the primary backing and extending from the face of the primary backing and exposed at the back surface of the primary backing, (c) an adhesive backing, (d) an optional secondary backing adjacent to the adhesive backing, and (e) at least one homogeneously branched linear ethylene polymer. The method includes extrusion coating at least one homogeneously branched linear ethylene polymer onto the back surface of a primary backing to provide an adhesive backing. The method can include additional steps or procedures, either separately or in various combinations. Additional steps and procedures include preheating the primary backing prior the extrusion step, multilayer adhesive backings, washing or scouring the primary backing prior the extrusion step, and utilizing adhesive polymeric additives, high heat content fillers, blowing agents and / or implosion agents. The constructions and methods described herein are particularly suited for making carpet tile.

Description

[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part application from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 039,217 filed Feb. 28, 1997, which application was in turn related to pending applications: Ser. No._____________, entitled "ETHYLENE POLYMER CARPET, CARPET BACKINGS AND METHODS"; Ser. No._______________ entitled "CARPET BACKINGS AND METHODS USING SUBSTANTIALLY LINEAR ETHYLENE POLYMERS METHODS"; Ser. No. ______________ entitled "CARPETS, CARPET BACKINGS AND METHODS USING SUBSTANTIALLY LINEAR ETHYLENE POLYMERS METHODS"; and Ser. No._____________ entitled "CARPETS, CARPET BACKINGS AND METHODS USING HOMOGENEOUS LINEAR ETHYLENE POLYMERS," all four of which were filed on Feb. 28, 1997, and the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.[0002] This invention relates to carpets and methods of making carpets, wherein, for each, the carpets comprise at least one flexible ethylene polymer backing material. In a particular instance, the invention relates to a carpet and a metho...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): D06M15/227A47G27/02D06N7/00
CPCB32B5/022D06N2203/065B32B5/245B32B5/26B32B7/12B32B27/12B32B27/20B32B27/32B32B2262/0253B32B2262/101B32B2264/0257B32B2266/025B32B2274/00B32B2307/554B32B2307/734B32B2471/02D10B2503/041D10B2503/042D06N7/0086D06N2213/065D06N2205/10D06N7/0073D06N7/0081D06N2203/045D06N2203/042D06N2203/048D06N2203/061D06N2201/082D06N7/0076D06N2209/105B32B5/20D06N2205/04D06N7/0068D06N2213/03Y10T428/23979Y10T428/23993
Inventor BRUMBELOW, JULIEMOODY, VONMULLINAX, WESLEY W.BIESER, JOHN O.GOINS, JAMES D.KELLEY, DAVID C.PENG, LICHIH R.TURLEY, ROBERT R.
Owner BRUMBELOW JULIE
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products