Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Parallel I/O network file server architecture

a network file server and parallel technology, applied in the field of computer data networks, can solve the problems of inability to satisfy the appetite of remote servers for data, inconvenient nfs, and limited potential performance available to workstation users

Inactive Publication Date: 2002-06-27
AUSPEX SYST
View PDF0 Cites 96 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

To date, however, network I / O limitations have constrained the potential performance available to workstation users.
Concurrently, these extremely fast clients have also gained an appetite for data that remote servers are unable to satisfy.
While simple and reliable, NFS is not optimal.
Clients using NFS place considerable demands upon both networks and NFS servers supplying clients with NFS data.
In addition to performance considerations, the low client-to-server ratio creates computing problems in several additional ways:
Development groups of more than 5-10 people cannot share the same server, and thus cannot easily share files without file replication and manual, multi-server updates.
Bridges or routers are a partial solution but inflict a performance penalty due to more network hops.
This burden includes network administration, hardware maintenance, and user account administration.
System administrators or operators must conduct multiple file system backups, which can be onerously time consuming tasks.
It is also expensive to duplicate backup peripherals on each server (or every few servers if slower network backup is used).
Conversion of a display-less workstation into a server may address disk capacity issues, but does nothing to address fundamental I / O limitations.
Adding larger disks, more network adaptors, extra primary memory, or even a faster processor do not resolve basic architectural I / O constraints; I / O throughput does not increase sufficiently.
This architecture is not optimal as a file server, however, at least because the two I / O processors cannot handle network file requests without involving the CPU.
One of the disadvantages of this computer architecture is that each CPU in the system runs its own complete operating system.
Additionally, the interprocessor communication is not optimized for file server type requests.
This architecture is disadvantageous as a file server because, among other things, both file data and the instructions for the CPUs reside in the same system memory.
This architecture is also disadvantageous as a file server because, among other things, each processor runs the entire operating system.
Interprocessor communication is also not optimal for file server applications.
But there is only one CPU on the card 10, so the processing of these requests is not accomplished in a truly parallel manner.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Parallel I/O network file server architecture
  • Parallel I/O network file server architecture
  • Parallel I/O network file server architecture

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0061] In FIG. 2 there is shown a block diagram of a network file server 100 according to the invention. It can include multiple network controller (NC) boards, one or more file controller (FC) boards, one or more storage processor (SP) boards, multiple system memory boards, and one or more host processors. The particular embodiment shown in FIG. 2 includes four network controller boards 110a-110d, two file controller boards 112a-112b, two storage processors 114a-114b, four system memory cards 116a-116d for a total of 192 MB of memory, and one local host processor 118. The boards 110, 112, 114, 116 and 118 are connected together over a VME bus 120 on which an enhanced block transfer mode as described in the ENHANCED VMEBUS PROTOCOL application identified above may be used. Each of the four network controllers 110 shown in FIG. 2 can be connected to up to two Ethernets 122, for a total capacity of 8 Ethernets 122a-122h. Each of the storage processors 114 operates ten parallel SCSI bu...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A file server architecture is disclosed, comprising as separate processors, a network controller unit, a file controller unit and a storage processor unit. These units incorporate their own processors, and operate in parallel with a local Unix host processor. All networks are connected to the network controller unit, which performs all protocol processing up through the NFS layer. The virtual file system is implemented in the file control unit, and the storage processor provides high-speed multiplexed access to an array of mass storage devices. The file controller unit control file information caching through its own local cache buffer, and controls disk data caching through a large system memory which is accessible on a bus by any of the processors.

Description

[0001] The present application is related to the following U.S. Patent Applications, all filed concurrently herewith.:[0002] 1. MULTIPLE FACILITY OPERATING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE, invented by David Hitz, Allan Schwartz, James Lau and Guy Harris;[0003] 2. ENHANCED VMEBUS PROTOCOL UTILIZING PSEUDOSYNCHRONOUS HANDSHAKING AND BLOCK MODE DATA TRANSFER, invented by Daryl Starr; and[0004] 3. BUS LOCKING FIFO MULTI-PROCESSOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM UTILIZING PSEUDOSYNCHRONOUS HANDSHAKING AND BLOCK MODE DATA TRANSFER invented by Daryl D. Starr, William Pitts and Stephen Blightman.[0005] The above applications are all assigned to the assignee of the present invention and are all expressly incorporated herein by reference.[0006] 1. Field of the Invention[0007] The invention relates to computer data networks, and more particularly, to network file server architectures for computer networks.[0008] 2. Description of the Related Art[0009] Over the past ten years, remarkable increases in hardware price / ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06F15/16G06F15/17G06F13/00G06F17/30H04L29/06H04L29/08
CPCG06F17/30224H04L29/06H04L69/329H04L67/40H04L67/42G06F16/1858H04L67/133G06F15/16H04L9/40H04L67/01
Inventor ROW, EDWARD JOHNBOUCHER, LAURENCE B.PITTS, WILLIAM M.BLIGHTMAN, STEPHEN E.
Owner AUSPEX SYST
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products