Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

A kind of slag Portland cement and production method thereof

A portland cement and production method technology, applied in cement production, etc., can solve problems such as complex production process, large fluctuations in product quality, lack of clinker production conditions, etc., achieve strong sulfate corrosion resistance, reduce The effect of investment in production equipment and saving non-renewable resources

Inactive Publication Date: 2016-05-18
LIAONING PETROCCHEM VOCATIONAL & TECH COLLEGE
View PDF1 Cites 0 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

The disadvantage of this method of producing cement is that there must be a link of clinker production, and the clinker calcination process consumes a lot of energy, and at the same time causes serious pollution to the environment, and the production process is complicated, and the product quality fluctuates greatly.
In addition, there are many areas where clinker production conditions do not exist, such as fuel but no limestone, limestone but no fuel
In some areas, there are a large number of mixed materials, such as iron factories, ferroalloy factories, and iron and steel factories. The waste residues discharged are piled up like mountains and cannot be used
There are also mountainous areas that store a large amount of zeolite rocks and volcanic ash rocks, but lack of clinker production conditions and cannot produce cement
In the northern region, a large amount of coal is used for heating in winter, and a large amount of slag ash is produced. Except for a small part for insulation and brick burning, a large amount is discharged into nature, which not only pollutes the environment, but also occupies land resources, which is a big waste.
The cement needed in these areas has to be shipped from far away, and the price is very high, which not only increases the construction cost, but also causes a waste of energy and resources

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment 1

[0038] Weigh 12kg of slag, 35kg of granulated blast furnace slag, 12kg of limestone, 6kg of dihydrate gypsum, 5kg of zeolite, 13kg of boiling slag, and 7kg of Class III fly ash, and send them into a pulverizer for crushing, and then grind them into a ball mill until the fineness is 0.08mm square. The remaining 2% of the hole sieve is mixed with 10kg of slag Portland cement (32.5 slag Portland cement) to obtain 32.5 slag Portland cement.

Embodiment 2

[0040] Weigh 20kg of slag, 42kg of granulated blast furnace slag, 2kg of anhydrous gypsum, 9kg of zeolite, and 17kg of boiling slag, and send them into a pulverizer for pulverization, and then pulverize through a ball mill until the fineness is less than 2% on a square hole sieve of 0.08mm. Mixed with 10 kg of slag portland cement (32.5 slag portland cement) to obtain 32.5 slag portland cement.

Embodiment 3

[0042] Weigh 30kg of slag, 10kg of granulated blast furnace slag, 7kg of limestone, 3kg of phosphogypsum, 10kg of zeolite, and 10kg of Class III fly ash, and send them into a pulverizer for crushing, then pass through a ball mill to grind to a fineness of 0.08mm and sieve the remainder through a square-hole sieve 2 % or less, and then mixed with 30kg of slag Portland cement (42.5 slag Portland cement) to obtain 42.5 slag Portland cement.

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The invention relates to a portland blast furnace slag cement and a preparation method thereof. The portland blast furnace slag cement is prepared from the following raw materials by weight percent: 12%-30% of at least one of slag, coal gangue, boiling slag, liquid slag, cinerite, kiln dust and crushed tile, 10%-42% of mineral waste residue, steel slag or silicomanganese slag, 0-12% of limestone, 2%-8% of gypsum, 0-10% of zeolite, 0-17% of boiling slag, 0-10% of coal ash, and 10%-50% of silicate series cement. The preparation method comprises steps of putting the slag, mineral waste residue, gypsum, zeolite, boiling slag, and coal ash into a pulverizer to be smashed, grinding by a ball mill to achieve the fineness of 0.08mm, sieving by a square hole sieve with 2% left, and then mixing with the silicate series cement. The portland blast furnace slag cement has the advantages of having a simple preparation method, needing no cement clinker, guaranteeing the strength and stability of the cement, fully using industrial residue resources like slag and mineral waste residue, lowering production cost, and reducing the pollution of industrial residue to the environment.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a slag portland cement and a production method thereof. Background technique [0002] The existing cement production process is to produce cement clinker first, that is, the raw materials: limestone, iron powder, clay, coal gangue, shale, gypsum, fluorite and coal are ground according to the required ratio, and after reaching a certain fineness , After calcination to produce a semi-finished product - cement clinker, then add different types of mixed materials and gypsum, and carry out the second grinding to make it reach a certain fineness, and then become the finished product - cement. The disadvantage of this method of producing cement is that clinker production is necessary, and the clinker calcination process consumes a lot of energy, and at the same time causes serious pollution to the environment, and the production process is complicated and the product quality fluctuates greatly. In addition, there are many areas where...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Patents(China)
IPC IPC(8): C04B7/26C04B7/21
CPCY02P40/10
Inventor 周宇飞
Owner LIAONING PETROCCHEM VOCATIONAL & TECH COLLEGE
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products