Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Systems and methods using mathematical reasoning blocks

a technology of mathematical reasoning and system and method, applied in the field of automatic systems and methods for student instruction and teacher training, can solve the problems of inability to balance intuitive, whole-language approaches to teaching mathematics with more-traditional approaches, and the lowest performers on such standardized tests

Inactive Publication Date: 2020-05-07
WEEMS RODNEY A
View PDF0 Cites 0 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The patent describes a new way of learning math using a computer program that helps users break down problems, teaches them typical errors, and provides differentiated instruction. The program uses a set of blocks that can be arranged in different ways to solve problems, but the arrangement of the blocks is constrained by the logic of the program. This allows for a more flexible and effective learning experience compared to traditional methods. The program also includes a teacher's guide that helps teachers provide more targeted instruction to their students. Overall, the program provides a more efficient and effective way to learn math.

Problems solved by technology

Yet, by the end of high school, they find themselves among the lowest performers on such standardized tests.
An inability to balance intuitive, whole-language approaches to teaching mathematics with more-traditional, analytic approaches is, in many ways, at the root of the entire problem.
Whether because of student laziness, poor teacher pedagogy, technological limitations or the failure of imagination, mathematics often ends up being taught and grasped in large, memorized chunks.
The problem becomes that students who memorize math problem solutions like phrases in a phrase book often find themselves lacking a sense of the individual parts making up the solutions as wholes.
They fail to acquire knowledge of how to rearrange these smaller constituent parts to express new ideas or solve new problems.
It occurs at the surface of the subject, resulting in multiple-choice environments that are overly mechanical and prone to intuitive guess-work on the part of students—a complete overemphasis on intuitive wholes.
But current attempts at success with this mode have resulted in rigid, unalterable templates that eliminate flexibility in the solution of problems.
For despite the widespread acceptance of reform-math approaches, no one has been able to scale theory up into widespread practice in a way that produces measureable results.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Systems and methods using mathematical reasoning blocks
  • Systems and methods using mathematical reasoning blocks
  • Systems and methods using mathematical reasoning blocks

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0169]In this example of one possible embodiment, a lesson overlay appears that presents written instructions and a video explanation of the skills the user will need to complete the upcoming problem set: In this problem set the user is directed to describe a sequence of events using positive and negative numbers. Once the lesson overlay is dismissed, the first problem is presented in the problem area of the lesson screen: Tommy finds five marbles on Monday. On Tuesday he looses two marbles. Write an expression that describes these events. See FIG. 9a.

[0170]The user is given a choice of three base-level reasoning blocks. When the Number reasoning block is selected, two secondary-level reasoning blocks specific to the embodiment in this example appear in the block reasoning area—a logical reasoning block titled Add and a second logical reasoning block titled Check. See FIG. 9b.

[0171]If the user drags the Check reasoning block into the work area, the system will refuse it at this po...

example 2

[0183]This example of one possible embodiment would begin just as the last example began, with the lesson overlay appearing then (when prompted by the user) moving to the lesson itself. The same first problem as in the last example is presented in the problem area of the lesson screen: Tommy finds five marbles on Monday. On Tuesday he looses two marbles. Write an expression that describes these events. See FIG. 10a.

[0184]The difference between these two examples is evident once the user selects the Number base-level reasoning block, causing the associated secondary-level reasoning blocks for this example of an environment to display a logical reasoning block titled Subtract and a second logical reasoning block titled Check. See FIG. 10b.

[0185]After dragging and dropping the Subtraction block from the block reasoning area into the work area, FIG. 10c, the user may enter the most intuitively obvious answer to this problem by using subtraction. In this case the student does not need ...

example 3

[0199]This example of one possible embodiment begins with a lesson overlay. Once the lesson overlay is dismissed the first problem is presented in the work area of the lesson screen. In this case, 5+2·1 must be simplified. See FIG. 11a.

[0200]Here, a numeric expression is at the heart of the problem, so the user may begin by selecting the base-level button titled Number. This causes five secondary-level blocks to be displayed, one of which is the Simplify block. See FIG. 11b.

[0201]In one possible embodiment, if the Simplify block is selected, then a set of tertiary blocks may be displayed, each tertiary block indicating one of the steps necessary for simplifying an algebraic expression. In one embodiment of this invention the blocks might represent the procedures for simplifying Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition and Subtraction—the traditional PEMDAS procedures taught in most schools across the United States.

[0202]In another possible embodiment, selecting t...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

This invention supplies a method to make the abstract, step-by-step logic of math problems visible via the use of digitized mathematical reasoning blocks, which can be used to construct an interactive teaching program that allows a student to select problem sets from an index of problems, allows the student to view a brief instructional video pertaining to that skill if desired, allows the student to chose the mode of problem presentation (i.e., various learning or test modes), allows the student to work randomly generated problems from within the chosen mode and set by picking mathematical reasoning blocks that represent the various necessary / possible sub-steps in route to the solution of that problem.

Description

STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES[0001]This is a continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 13 / 683,408, filed on Nov. 21, 12, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61 / 563,272, filed on Nov. 23, 2011, the teachings of both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.BACKGROUNDField[0002]The present disclosure relates generally to automated systems and methods for student instruction and teacher training and, more specifically but not exclusively, to systems and methods using mathematical reasoning blocks.Description of the Related Art[0003]This section introduces aspects that may help facilitate a better understanding of the embodiments disclosed herein. Accordingly, the statements of this section are to be read in this light and are not to be understood as admissions about what is in the prior art or what is not in the prior art.[0004]American elementary school math students score among the top children from industrialized countries on...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G09B5/02
CPCG09B5/02
Inventor WEEMS, RODNEY A.
Owner WEEMS RODNEY A
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products