Knee prosthesis

Abstract

A knee prosthesis for use in a total knee replacement surgical procedure may include a femoral component, a tibial component and a meniscal component. Optionally, the prosthesis may also include a patellar component. The femoral component may include a bone attachment side and a joint facing side, the latter including an anterior joint surface, a posterior joint surface having a cross-sectional shape defining a portion of a cylinder, and medial and lateral grooves between the anterior and posterior joint surfaces. The meniscal component may include a number of features designed to mate with the femoral component to provide relatively natural movement and range of motion about the knee joint as well as stability and resistance to wear and tear.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]1. Field of the Invention[0002]The invention is related to surgical devices for total knee replacement surgery. More specifically, the invention is related to a knee prosthesis for total knee replacement surgery.[0003]2. Description of the Related Art[0004]Approximately 581,000 total knee replacement surgeries (also referred to as total knee arthroplasty (“TKA”)) are performed annually in the U.S. for the treatment of chronic knee pain and dysfunction. As the U.S. and world populations become older and more obese and knee joints endure greater wear and tear from increased loads and years of stress, TKA becomes a more and more commonly performed surgical procedure. The goals of TKA are to provide the patient with a knee joint that is pain free, moves naturally through a full range of motion, provides stability during motion and rest, and lasts as long as possible. Many different total knee implants (or “knee prostheses”) have been developed in pursuit...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The prosthesis system enhances natural kinematics, reduces wear, and minimizes bone removal, thereby improving the longevity and stability of the implant while facilitating easier revision surgeries by maintaining more patient bone and soft tissue.

Problems solved by technology

Many different total knee implants (or “knee prostheses”) have been developed in pursuit of these goals, but no total knee prosthesis is perfect.

Other prostheses may provide certain kinematic advantages but may wear out more easily, thus requiring revision surgery more frequently.

In an arthritic knee, protective cartilage at the point of articulation of the femur with the tibia has been worn away, which causes significant pain and discomfort.

The goals of freedom of motion and stability can conflict with one another, since creating a more stable knee joint often means reducing freedom of motion.

For example, most currently available prostheses compromise either knee joint stability or natural, full range of motion to an extent that is suboptimal for a patient.

Additionally, most prostheses wear out more quickly than would be ideal, often in predictable wear patterns.

Another limitation with conventional posterior cruciate substituting knee designs is that they require excess removal of bone for implantation.

Excessive bone removal can lead to intraoperative fractures due to the stress concentration created by cutting out bone to accommodate the box of the design.

Bone removal is also disadvantageous, because, in the event of revision surgery, the more bone available, the easier the revision surgery will be.

Images