Eureka AIR delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

Printability verification by progressive modeling accuracy

a printing accuracy and progressive modeling technology, applied in the field of optical lithography, can solve the problems of complex opc methodologies, ever increasing cost of mask manufacturing and inspection, and ever increasing complexity of opc and ret, and achieve the effect of efficient computation of printability verification

Inactive Publication Date: 2009-03-31
GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC
View PDF23 Cites 77 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0009]Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for efficient computation of printability verification on a lithography layout.
[0010]It is another object of the present invention to progressively increase the accuracy of the printability verification simulation.
[0011]It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method to quickly prune out regions of the mask layout devoid of any errors.

Problems solved by technology

However, the ever shrinking device dimensions combined with the desire to enhance circuit performance in the deep sub-wavelength domain require complex OPC methodologies to ensure the fidelity of mask patterns on the printed wafer.
The ever increasing cost of mask manufacturing and inspection and the ever increasing complexity of OPC and RET require that the mask is correctly and accurately simulated for potential defects before the mask is manufactured.
The cost of finding the error when the mask is actually manufactured and is being used for chip manufacturing is extremely high.
Since, a missed error is significantly more expensive than a false error, all printability verification tools are expected to err on the conservative side.
If there are too many false errors, the real errors may be missed by the manual inspection and also it would require a lot of time to shift through all the false errors to find the real errors.
This tends to increase the runtime of the printability verification along with the number of false errors.
Furthermore, the goal of printability verification is to determine the existence of errors in printability, and identify such errors, rather than accurately determining what the image will look like.
However, it is also important that any real printability errors are not missed as a result of less accurate simulations.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Printability verification by progressive modeling accuracy
  • Printability verification by progressive modeling accuracy
  • Printability verification by progressive modeling accuracy

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0045]In describing the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will be made herein to FIGS. 1-16 in which like numerals refer to like features of the invention. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale.

[0046]Catastrophic Print Errors

[0047]A typical printability verification methodology is illustrated in FIG. 1. The input to a conventional printability verification procedure includes one or more input mask layouts 101 typically resulting after application of RET and / or OPC to the initial mask layout. A target wafer image 100 is also provided as an input. In the next step (Block 102) all the target and mask shapes are typically divided into edge segments, and then (Block 103), a correspondence is established between each mask and target shape segments. In the next step (Block 104), the formation of the wafer image segment corresponding to each mask segment is simulated using a calibrated resist and optical model. The simulated wafer segment is then compared aga...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A fast method of verifying a lithographic mask design is provided wherein catastrophic errors are identified by iteratively simulating and verifying images for the mask layout using progressively more accurate image models, including optical and resist models. Progressively accurate optical models include SOCS kernels that provide successively less influence. Corresponding resist models are constructed that may include only SOCS kernel terms corresponding to the optical model, or may include image trait terms of varying influence ranges. Errors associated with excessive light, such as bridging, side-lobe or SRAF printing errors, are preferably identified with bright field simulations, while errors associated with insufficient light, such as necking or line-end shortening overlay errors, are preferably identified with dark field simulations.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]This invention relates generally to the field of optical lithography, and more particularly, to a method for verifying the accuracy of the results of an Model Based Optical Proximity Correction (MBOPC) software tool for use in an optical lithography simulation, to provide accurate correction of the device shapes in a photo-mask that fulfill required performance criteria for the resulting Very Large Scale Integrated (VLSI) circuit.[0002]The optical micro-lithography process in semiconductor fabrication, also known as the photolithography process, consists of duplicating desired circuit patterns onto semiconductor wafers for an overall desired circuit performance. The desired circuit patterns are typically represented as opaque, complete and semi-transparent regions on a template commonly referred to as a photomask. In optical micro-lithography, patterns on the photo-mask template are projected onto the photo-resist coated wafer by way of optical imagi...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Patents(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06F17/50
CPCG03F1/144G03F1/36G03F7/70433G03F7/705G03F7/70866
Inventor GALLATIN, GREGG M.LAI, KAFAIMUKHERJEE, MAHARAJROSENBLUTH, ALAN E.
Owner GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products