Specific delivery of agrochemicals

a technology for agrochemicals and plants, applied in the direction of immunoglobulins against plants, biocide, peptides, etc., can solve the problems of reduced efficacy of chemicals, loss of biodiversity, groundwater contamination, etc., and achieve the effect of reducing the dose of agrochemicals, maintaining the overall efficacy, and reducing the frequency of application

Inactive Publication Date: 2013-08-22
AGROSAVFE
View PDF4 Cites 6 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0015]Targeting agents comprising these binding domains, can retain agrochemicals specifically to binding sites on the plant or plant parts and can be used to deliver and retain agrochemicals to the plant, preferably to the intact living plant, so that the binding domains comprised in such targeting agents specifically bind to binding sites on the plant, where the agrochemicals can exert their activity. Agrochemical compositions comprising at least one targeting agent and an agrochemical, preferably bound on or comprised in a carrier, may be suitable to allow the use of a reduced dose of the agrochemical and / or reduction of the frequency of application of the agrochemical, comprised in such composition whilst maintaining its overall efficacy.
[0016]Moreover, when comprised in a composition disclosed herein, the agrochemical may exert its activity over a longer period of time, eventually resulting in less agrochemical being lost and contaminating the environment; also, by applying an agrochemical in a composition hereof, it is possible to introduce specificity into the activity of the agrochemical that is otherwise not present.

Problems solved by technology

Apart from giving rise to reduced efficacy of the chemical, losses of chemicals into the soil due to dripping off the plant while spraying or due to wash-out during rainfall may result in groundwater contamination, environmental damage, loss of biodiversity, and human and animal health consequences.
Although this may have advantages compared with the normal spraying, the efficacy of such delivery method is limited, and the particles may be non-optimally distributed over the leaf, or washed away under naturally variable climatological conditions, before the release of the compound is completed.
First, although cellulose is a major component of plant cell walls and about 33% of all plant matter consists of cellulose, cellulose is, in intact living plants, shielded off from the outside environment by the plant cuticle, formed by cutin and waxes, which is an impermeable barrier with which plant cell walls are covered, making cellulose poorly accessible for binding by CBDs.
Second, effective delivery of an encapsulated benefit agent to the plant requires simultaneous binding of the first binding domain to the plant and the second binding domain to the microparticle. As the likelihood of both binding events occurring is determined by a delicate equilibrium between the molar concentrations of the binding domains and their target molecules and the molar concentration of the bound complex, it is highly unlikely that sufficient multifunctional fusion proteins are present in solution to enable such simultaneous binding. Moreover, the equilibrium of a binding event is strongly influenced by environmental parameters such as temperature and pH, for which the optimal conditions may be considerably different for each of the binding domains. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that such simultaneous binding of two binding domains of such multifunctional fusion protein would result in a sufficiently strong binding that would retain an encapsulated benefit agent to a plant.
Third, although binding of a CBD is to a certain extent specific for cellulose, using a multifunctional fusion protein in which CBD should bind to the plant is to be considered as a generic binding approach, as all plants contain cellulose, and is therefore similar to aspecific sticking with tackifiers or stickers. A targeted approach in which specific binding of a binding domain would allow discrimination between binding to one plant species versus another would be of considerably higher value. WO03031477 also suggests, without further exemplification, that other binders to carbohydrates or polysaccharides can be used to generate fusion proteins to deposit microparticles onto living organisms. However, neither binding domains other than CBDs, nor binding domains binding to intact living plants were disclosed in WO03031477.
However, it is unclear whether any of the plant cell wall constituents to which the antibodies have been generated, would be directly accessible for an antibody from the outside environment.
However, so far, no plant-binding VHH have been described.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Specific delivery of agrochemicals
  • Specific delivery of agrochemicals
  • Specific delivery of agrochemicals

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Generation and Selection of VHH

[0242]Immunization of Llamas with Gum Arabic, Potato Leaf Homogenate, or Wheat Leaf Homogenate

[0243]A solution of gum arabic was prepared by weighing 5 g of gum arabic from acacia tree (Sigma) and dissolving in 50 ml water. Bradford protein assay was used to determine the total protein concentration. Aliquots were made, stored at −80° C., and used for immunization. Homogenized leaves from potato plants (Solanum tuberosum variety Désirée) or wheat plants (Triticum aestivum variety Boldus) were prepared by freezing leaves in liquid nitrogen and homogenizing the leaves with mortar and pestle until a fine powder was obtained. Bradford protein assay was used to determine the total protein concentration. Aliquots were made, stored at −80° C., and suspensions were used for immunization.

[0244]Llamas were immunized at weekly intervals with six intramuscular injections of gum arabic, homogenized potato leaves, or homogenized wheat leaves, according to standard p...

example 2

Characterization of the VHH

[0253]Single-Point Binding ELISA—

[0254]A single-point binding ELISA was used to identify clones that bind to gum arabic or plant extracts. VHH-containing extracts for ELISA were prepared as follows. 96-well plates with 100 μl per well 2×TY, 2% glucose 100 μg / ml ampicillin were inoculated from the master plates and grown at 37° C. overnight. 25 μl per well of overnight culture was used to inoculate fresh 96-well deep-well plates containing 1 ml per well 2×TY; 0.1% glucose; 100 μg / ml ampicillin. After growing at 37° C. in a shaking incubator for 3 hours, IPTG was added to 1 mM final concentration and recombinant VHH was produced during an additional incubation for 4 hours. Cells were spun down by centrifugation at 3,000 g for 20 minutes and stored at −20° C. overnight. Cell pellets were thawed, briefly vortexed, and 125 μl per well of room temperature PBS was added. Cells were resuspended on an ELISA shaker platform at room temperature for 15 minutes. Plates...

example 3

Binding of Binding Domains to Plant Surface

[0266]VHH Binding to Leaf Discs—

[0267]VHH binding to non-fixed leaf discs of potato (variety Désirée), black nightshade, grass, wheat or azalea was investigated. For comparison, binding of CBM3a to non-fixed leaf discs of potato (variety Désirée) was analyzed in parallel. Leaf discs were prepared by punching a fresh potato leaf with a 5 mm belt hole puncher tool. Leaf discs were put immediately in wells of a 96-well plate containing 200 μl per well 5% MPBS or PBS, and incubated for 30 minutes. Leaf discs were transferred to solutions containing 5 μg / ml VHH antibody fragment, respectively 5 μg / ml CBM3a in 2% MPBS or PBS and incubated for 60-90 minutes. Unbound VHH or CBM3a proteins were removed by washing three times with 2% MPBS or PBS. Bound VHH or CBM3a proteins were detected with incubation with monoclonal mouse anti-histidine antibodies directly conjugated with Alexa-488 fluorescent dye (Abd Serotec) in 1% MPBS for 1 hour. Unbound antib...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
dissociation constantaaaaaaaaaa
dissociation constantaaaaaaaaaa
dissociation constantaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

Described is the specific delivery of agrochemicals to plants. More specifically, described is a composition having a targeting agent comprising at least one binding domain that specifically binds to a binding site on an intact living plant and an agrochemical or a combination of agrochemicals. Also described is a binding domain that specifically binds the binding site on an intact living plant. More specifically, described are binding domains comprising a peptide sequence that comprises four framework regions and three complementary-determining regions, or any suitable fragment thereof, so that the binding domains are able to bind or retain a carrier onto a plant. Described are binding domains that specifically bind trichomes, stomata, cuticle, lenticels, thorns, spines, root hairs, or wax layer. Described is a method for delivery of agrochemicals to a plant, for improving the deposition of agrochemicals on a plant, and for retaining the agrochemicals on a plant, using targeting agents comprising the binding domains, and to a method for protecting a plant against biotic or abiotic stress or controlling plant growth using the same. Also, described is a method for manufacturing a specifically targeting agrochemical carrier.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)[0001]This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13 / 081,435, filed Apr. 6, 2011, which is a utility conversion of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61 / 341,930, filed Apr. 6, 2010, and claims priority to European Patent Application Serial No. EP 10159100.6, filed Apr. 6, 2010, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety.STATEMENT ACCORDING TO 37 C.F.R. §1.821(c) or (e) SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED AS PDF FILE WITH A REQUEST TO TRANSFER CRF FROM PARENT APPLICATION[0002]Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.821(c) or (e), a file containing a PDF version of the Sequence Listing has been submitted concomitant with this application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The transmittal documents of this application include a Request to Transfer CRF from the parent application.TECHNICAL FIELD[0003]The disclosure relates to specific de...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A01N25/28
CPCA01N25/00A01N25/28A61K47/48507C07K16/16C07K2317/35C07K2317/92C07K2317/569A01N25/24A01N53/00A61K47/6835A01N3/00
Inventor VERHEESEN, PETERDE JONGHE, CHRIS
Owner AGROSAVFE
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products