Two part "L" -shaped Phakic IOL

Abstract

An intraocular lens device including a foldable lens optic configured to fit through a small incision in the eye connected to a lens frame haptic configured to fit separately through a small incision in the eye.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0001]The present invention generally relates to a two part “L”-shaped IOL. More specifically, the present invention relates to an IOL film frame which is insertable through an opening as small as 1.0 mm without deforming the frame and a lens which can then be attached within the eye.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]The history of intraocular lenses (IOLs) is a long and varied one. Intraocular lenses can be used to treat a wide diversity of eye conditions ranging from cataracts to any type of eyesight correction. In addition, IOLs can be used to replace an irreversibly damaged lens in the eye—aphakic eyes. Alternatively, the lenses can be used in addition to the natural lens to correct the vision—phakic eyes. These lenses can be placed in the anterior or posterior chambers of the eye.[0003]Early IOL researchers were plagued with problems associated with the materials which were obtainable to them at the time (early 1950's) making the lenses too heavy and too la...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0011]Accordingly, an intraocular lens (IOL) has been developed. The intraocular lens features an optic and a haptic. The haptic is “V”-shaped and features relatively more rigid elements formed of relatively higher modulus (harder) materials which are flexibly springy when thin. The haptics may also comprise less rigid elements formed of relatively lower modulus (softer) materials bridging a discontinuity separating the haptics. The “V”-shaped haptic allows for insertion of the haptic through an opening in the eye as small as about 1 mm without deforming the frame. The haptic also features a fastening structure for the separate optic, preferably a cleat. The foldable optic is then inserted into the eye through the same ultra small incision and attached to the haptic, preferably the haptic cleat, by way of a formed aperture or eyelet in the optic.

[0020]Still further, the invention is a method of mounting a lens in the anterior chamber of an eye, having the steps of supporting a lens on a plate haptic at the angle of the anterior chamber; and bending the haptic at a preferential hinge line to reduce pressure against the angle.

Problems solved by technology

Early IOL researchers were plagued with problems associated with the materials which were obtainable to them at the time (early 1950's) making the lenses too heavy and too large.

Surgery of the eye was in its infancy and therefore there were many problems with the surgical procedures.

Along with the early problems with the optics and surgical techniques, placement of a lens in the anterior chamber proved difficult because the anterior chamber is narrow (about 1.5 to 2.5 mm).

However, early lenses experienced marked problems with endothelial loss due to chafing against the early thick lenses.

Later lenses were able to reduce the significance of this problem, but still retained problems associated with placement of the IOL in the chamber angle.

Additionally, the tissue in the area is easily irritated and irritation initiates a growth of fibrous tissue, called synechiae.

This compromise is difficult to obtain.

In addition, although the results were excellent in the short-term, there was a significant problem in the long term with altered night vision, loss of endothelial cell populations and alteration of the anterior uvea.

These problems as well as the fact that such anteriorly positioned lenses were uncomfortable to the patient, caused many doctors to abandon anterior chamber IOL's.

The slenderness makes it more difficult for someone looking at the patient to see the IOL through the eye.

Because of their size, plate haptics tend to be more easily seen from outside in the patient's eye and the addition of extra material weight to the IOL and reduced flexibility as compared to fiber haptics leads to poor fixation and consequent migration or dislocation of the IOL.

While, fiber haptics have the disadvantage of initiating a process in which the body builds fibrous tissue or synechiae around the fiber haptic which immobilizes the iris, the larger plate haptic very rarely, if ever, causes such a reaction.

Although a 3 mm incision does not usually require sutures for healing, it increases the chances of infection, heals slower, and may provide for a slower operation then if an incision of less than 3 mm is used.

However, presently IOLs cannot be inserted into a very small incision, as small as 1 mm.

Images