Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Methods and compositions for tailing and amplifying RNA

a technology of rna and rna molecules, applied in the field of molecular biology, can solve the problems of ineffective capture of rna molecules lacking poly(a) tails, inability to fully realize in vivo whole genome expression analysis methods, and ineffective capture methods of mrna purification from eukaryotic cells, etc., to achieve efficient and uniform tailing of targeted rna

Active Publication Date: 2006-03-09
APPL BIOSYSTEMS INC
View PDF5 Cites 65 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0016] The present invention provides methods and compositions for tailing and amplifying a targeted RNA molecule. A targeted RNA molecule may be any non-polyadenylated RNA molecule. Examples of non-polyadenylated RNA include microRNA, siRNA, tRNA, rRNA, synthetic RNA, or non-polyadenylated mRNA, such as mRNA from bacteria or fragments of prokaryotic or eukaryotic mRNAs such as may be encountered in degraded RNA samples. Advantages of the present invention include the ability to efficiently and uniformly tail a targeted RNA and the ability to representatively amplify a population of targeted RNA molecules in a sample.
[0018] In one embodiment, the invention provides a method for increasing the efficiency of tailing a targeted RNA in a sample comprising altering the secondary structure of the targeted RNA, and incubating the targeted RNA in the presence of an enzyme that adds a nucleic acid tail under conditions that allow tailing of the targeted RNA. As used herein, “increasing the efficiency of tailing” refers to increasing the percentage of targeted RNA molecules that are tailed during the reaction. In preferred embodiments, at least about 75%, 80%, 85%, or 90% of the targeted RNA molecules in a sample are tailed. More preferably, at least about 95% of the targeted RNA molecules are tailed. Even more preferably, at least about 99% of the targeted RNA molecules are tailed. In certain embodiments, about 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or about 100% of the targeted RNA molecules are tailed.
[0044] Depleting rRNA from the sample can enable the relative enrichment of targeted RNA to total RNA in a sample by about or at least about 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, or 1000 fold or any range derivable therein.
[0053] In certain aspects of the invention, the targeted RNA and / or amplified RNA are labeled. Labeling the targeted RNA and / or amplified RNA facilitates the detection of the molecules in applications such as expression analysis. A number of different labels may be used in the present invention such as fluorophores, chromophores, radiophores, enzymatic tags, antibodies, chemiluminescence, electroluminescence, and affinity labels. Those of skill in the art are familiar with methods for labeling nucleic acids and will recognize that these and other labels not mentioned herein can be used with success in this invention.

Problems solved by technology

The commonly used method for mRNA purification from eukaryotic cells, oligo-dT capture, is ineffective for capturing RNA molecules lacking poly(A) tails.
The study of these important RNA molecules is hindered by inadequate methods for their isolation and amplification.
Another example of the difficulties encountered when analyzing non-polydenylated RNA molecules is the study of bacterial gene expression.
However, methods for in vivo whole genome expression analyses have not been fully realized.
The technical difficulties that hinder these studies include (1) purifying bacterial RNA free from large amounts of contaminating host cell RNA, and (2) purifying adequate amounts of bacterial RNA for DNA microarray analysis.
Identifying bacterial genes whose expression is altered by host cells has not been easy, and microbiologists have used numerous techniques to address the challenge.
However, all of these methods have limitations.
Most require significant genetic manipulation (construction of mutants, libraries, gene fusions) and are labor intensive.
Chief amongst the limitations is that none allows for quantification of genome-wide expression.
However, at this point, it too is limited by resolution and sensitivity.
If it is not, detergent treatment will likely alter the gene expression profile of the bacteria.
In addition, selective detergent lysis of host cells is less effective with many Gram-negative bacteria that are easily lysed with such detergents (e.g., Yersinia enterocolitica).
Furthermore, variable susceptibility of eukaryotic cells to saponin-mediated lysis makes optimization difficult.
But, this results in the loss of ˜30% of hybridization signals on E. coli arrays (Khil and Camerini-Otero, 2002; Arfin et al., 2000).
A small percentage of bacterial mRNAs are poly(A)-tailed, but these are targeted for degradation and tend to be unstable.
As a result, the commonly used method for mRNA purification with eukaryotic cells, oligo-dT capture, is ineffective for capturing bacterial mRNAs.
However, using their method Amara and Vijaya were not able to efficiently poly(A) tail the transcripts.
Optimizing the reaction to work reproducibly in many different bacterial cell lysates would likely be very difficult.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Methods and compositions for tailing and amplifying RNA
  • Methods and compositions for tailing and amplifying RNA

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Optimized Polyadenylation of Bacterial mRNA

[0145] Seemingly straightforward and simple, the polyadenylation of complex RNA populations is actually a quite complicated reaction. For polyadenylating bacterial mRNAs, the inventors used purified poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I) enzyme of E. coli. PAP I or PAP adds AMP to 3′ ends of RNA molecules using ATP as a donor. The efficiency of PAP has been found to vary with different substrate RNAs. RNAs with 3′ end nucleotides that are paired, such as in a hairpin, are less efficiently polyadenylated (Feng and Cohen, 2000). The enzyme uses an ordered bi-bi kinetic mechanism and adds adenines distributively (Eun, 1996). Initiation and elongation occur at different rates, and the enzyme dissociates from the primer after every step.

[0146] The initial goal was to ensure that all mRNAs in a population of bacterial mRNA were poly(A) tailed, thereby ensuring that they will be templates for the 1st strand cDNA synthesis reaction—the first step in amplif...

example 2

Effect of MnCl2 Concentration on Polyadenylation Reaction

[0153] This experiment was designed to test whether or not the addition of MnCl2 has an effect on poly(A) tailing efficiency and tail length. The reaction utilized 100 ng of a synthetic in vitro transcribed RNA of 387 nucleotides as template. The reactions were performed as follows:

[0154] RNA template (100 ng) and H2O to a final volume of 10 μl were combined in a 0.5 ml tube. The RNA solution was heat denatured at 70° C. for 10 minutes and then quenched on ice for 3 minutes. The other reactants were then added as a 15 μl cocktail containing: 5 μl 5× Polyadenylation buffer, 1.25 μl 1 mM ATP, 1 μl Ribonuclease inhibitor (40 U / μl), 1 μl E. coli Poly(A) Polymerase (2 U / μl) and 4.25 μl H2O. Depending on the reaction (with MnCl2 or without MnCl2) either 2.5 μl 25 mM MnCl2 or 2.5 μl H2O was also added. The reactions were allowed to incubate at 37° C. for various time points. At the end of this incubation 2 μl of 0.5 M EDTA was adde...

example 3

Bacterial RNA Amplification

[0156] In this experiment total E. coli RNA was polyadenylated and amplified. Two RNA preparations were used (lot # PR043921 and the same RNA after purification over a glass fiber filter column) for amplification and two in vitro transcription (IVT) incubation times were compared (6 hours and 14 hours).

[0157] Total RNA template (10 ng or 100 ng) and H2O to a final volume of 5 μl were combined in a 0.5 ml tube. The RNA solution was heat denatured at 70° C. for 10 minutes and then quenched on ice for at 3 minutes. The other reactants were then added as a 5 μl cocktail containing: 1× Polyadenylation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM DTT), 50 μM ATP, 40 Units Ribonuclease inhibitor Protein, 2 Units E. coli Poly(A) Polymerase. The reaction was incubated for 15 minutes at 37° C. and placed on ice until the amplification step.

[0158] Ambion's MessageAmp II RNA amplification kit was used to amplify the polyadenylated bacterial RNA ac...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention provides methods and compositions that enable tagging and amplification of targeted RNA molecules. A targeted RNA molecule is any non-polyadenylated RNA molecule including, for example, miRNA, siRNA, rRNA, tRNA, synthetic RNA, or non-polyadenylated mRNA such as mRNA from bacteria. In certain aspects, the invention provides methods and compositions for the genome-wide expression analysis of bacterial genes. Significantly, the methods enable genome-wide expression analysis in circumstances where bacterial numbers were previously too low to purify adequate amounts of RNA for DNA microarray analysis or other applications. Such methods are particularly useful for the study of bacterial gene expression during host-cell infection. The invention also provides kits for tagging and amplifying targeted RNA molecules.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] 1. Field of the Invention [0002] The present invention relates generally to the field of molecular biology. More particularly, it concerns methods and compositions for tailing and amplifying non-polyadenylated RNA molecules, including microRNA, siRNA, tRNA, rRNA, synthetic RNA, and non-polyadenylated mRNA, such as mRNA from bacteria or fragments of prokaryotic or eukaryotic mRNAs such as may be encountered in degraded RNA samples. [0003] 2. Description of Related Art [0004] The commonly used method for mRNA purification from eukaryotic cells, oligo-dT capture, is ineffective for capturing RNA molecules lacking poly(A) tails. Examples of RNA molecules that are not polyadenylated include microRNA, siRNA, tRNA, rRNA, synthetic RNA, and non-polyadenylated mRNA from prokaryotes. In addition, mRNA fragments, such as may be encountered in degraded RNA samples, may also lack poly(A) tails. The study of these important RNA molecules is hindered by inadequat...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C12Q1/68C12P19/34
CPCC12P19/34C12Q1/6806C12Q2525/204C12Q2525/173C12Q2527/137C12Q2521/325
Inventor MURPHY, GEORGEWHITLEY, J.
Owner APPL BIOSYSTEMS INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products