Content addressable information encapsulation, representation, and transfer

Abstract

Representing a number of assets on an originating computer begins with selecting the assets to be represented. Cryptographic hash asset identifiers are generated; each of the asset identifiers is computed using the contents of a particular asset. The asset identifier is a content-based or content-addressable asset name for the asset and is location independent. An asset list is generated that includes the asset identifiers computed from the assets. A cryptographic hash asset list identifier is generated that is computed from the asset list. The asset list identifier is stored for later retrieval. The assets selected are also stored for safekeeping either locally or on a computer network. In the event of loss of the files from the originating computer, the asset list identifier is retrieved. Using the asset list identifier, the original asset list is found and retrieved from its safe location. The asset identifiers from the retrieved asset list are used to find and retrieve the individual assets from their backup locations. The assets are verified by recomputing the cryptographic hash asset identifier for each asset retrieved and comparing it to the asset identifier from the asset list. The MD5 algorithm is used for the cryptographic hash function. Assets are retrieved using a multicast protocol. A series of importer programs searches for assets to retrieve in progressively more remote locations. Assets are retrieved whole or in segments.

Description

[0001] This application claims priority of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60 / 072,316, filed Jan. 23, 1998, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney Docket No. WRSHP003), filed concurrently herewith, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] 1. Field of the Invention [0003] The present invention relates generally to methods and apparatuses for encapsulating information, identifying the information, representing the information, and facilitating the transfer of the information between users, between remote storage and an originating user, or between remote storages using computers and digital telecommunication networks. [0004] 2. Description of the Related Art [0005] Digital information must often be identified to be in a particular state, denoted by the status of an asset (such as a file) as of some event or time. ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

"The patent describes a system and method for representing digital information in a way that is unique and can be easily identified. This is useful for storing and retrieving the information for future use. The system uses a cryptographic hash function to create a unique identifier for each file or other digital asset. The identifier is derived from the content of the file and can be used to access the file without needing to fully understand the file's structure. The system also includes a descriptor file that contains information about the assets, such as their context and metadata. This allows for easy organization and management of the assets. Overall, the system provides a way to efficiently and securely manage large amounts of digital information."

Problems solved by technology

Digital information is highly subject to change and few methods are available to inspect the contents of the digital information to reliably recognize whether it has been changed since some prior time or event.

Normal attempts to improve or perfect the content, inadvertent commands or actions which change the content, or tampering by others unknown to primary owners of the digital information are difficult to detect.

As such, computers users have no convenient mechanism for establishing the origin or integrity of particular content versions.

Another problematic attribute of digital information (such as a computer file) is that copies may exist which are identical in content but differ in the meta data that the computer system uses to relate to the digital information.

Such confusion makes it difficult to avoid unnecessary duplication of content on a single computer or on a collection of computers on a network.

This confusion may also result in the unnecessary coping of such data files across networks or from other media when, in fact, a particular data file needed is readily available on a computer system or network already.

The existence of a particular file under multiple names has a counterpart problem.

For example, files within a sub-directory are at risk if someone changes the sub-directory name.

If changed, the path to a file becomes invalid, and all of the stored or remembered names of files become invalid as well.

This fragile approach to location of data by location leads to many kinds of problems for users and administrators of computer systems, particularly those working with networked systems.

Finally, there is no convenient way for computer users to identify collections of specific versions of digital files.

No robust mechanism exists for computers or their users to refer to collections of specific copies or versions of digital files without creating a new entity which incorporates copies of the files into a new form.

The difficulty of such solutions is that often exact digital copies of many of the files in an archive are already present on the systems to which they are copied.

This duplication of identical content is difficult to avoid using existing techniques.

The result of these problems is that duplicate copies of digital files are frequently stored on computer storage devices (at expense to the owner of the system) or transferred on media or telecommunications devices (at further expense to the system owner and the telecommunications provider).

This duplication strain limited resources and causes needless confusion on local private networks (local area networks, for example) and on collections of systems connected by digital telecommunication networks.

One problem with extra copies is that one might think they are different when they are in fact the same (and copies are needlessly stored), or when they are different, one might think they are the same because of the same file name.

The inability of systems to reliably distinguish different versions of files with the same identifier or to recognize identical files with different identifiers wastes network resources and creates confusion when files are transferred between users of a network.

Sending an e-mail message with an attached file or using a point-to-point scheme in a network to distribute files can be inefficient in terms of the amount of network bandwidth that is used.

In such a case, the network bandwidth used to transfer the attached files is wasted.

A similar problem occurs in managing computers on a network and making sure that the computers are configured in a certain way with certain applications.

When files are distributed on a local area network (LAN) from a source outside the LAN, the problem can be even more serious.

This is perhaps the most inefficient way for the required software to be distributed within a company.

This mechanism is dependent on the integrity of system clocks and date settings which are unreliable due to accidental or malicious entry of false settings.

Furthermore, the mechanism fails in principle when dealing with the identification of identical files from different systems.

Furthermore, identical copies of digital files on different systems are not readily recognized as the same because the mechanism in Alley provides no mechanism to do so.

However, no truly distributed system has been devised for sharing and providing access to data whereby data may be reliably and automatically retrieved from any place where it may be found on a network, instead of from specified locations which are designed to store and provide access to data.

Images