Method and apparatus to decrease the risk of intraneuronal injection during administration of nerve block anesthesia

Abstract

An objective and reproducible system for, and method of, monitoring and / or controlling the pressure during nerve blockage injection, especially by less experienced personnel, is provided in order to decrease the possibility of intraneuronal injection. More specifically, the present invention employs a pressure sensing and / or limiting device located between an injection device (typically a syringe) and a nerve block needle whereby injection pressure during a nerve block injection can be easily and objectively monitored, thereby allowing the operator to monitor the injection pressure and / or injection speed during a nerve blockage injection procedure and to take appropriate corrective actions if abnormal pressure conditions are observed.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The present invention relates generally to administration of regional or local anesthesia to achieve peripheral nerve blockade, such as is useful when a surgeon operates on a patient's arm or leg or to treat pain emanating in the said or other body parts. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system of local anesthetic administration that includes a device for indicating pressures interposed between the syringe with local anesthetic and needle for locating the nerves during administration of nerve blocks. Additionally, since the pressure during nerve block injection also depend on the speed of injection, the same device can be used to indirectly monitor and limit the excessive speed of injection BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] When a surgeon operates on the legs or arms, nerve block anesthesia may be performed to numb or anesthetize the nerves innervating the region being operated upon. Performance of nerve blocks consis...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0009] The present invention provides an objective and reproducible method of monitoring and / or controlling the pressure during nerve blockage injection, especially by less experienced personnel and / or assistants, in order to decrease the possibility of intraneuronal injection. More specifically, the present invention employs a pressure sensing and / or limiting device located between an injection device (typically a syringe) and a nerve block needle whereby injection pressure during a nerve block injection can be easily and objectively monitored, thereby allowing the operator to monitor the injection pressure during a nerve blockage injection procedure. Additionally, since the pressure during nerve block injection also depend on the speed of injection, the same device can be used to indirectly monitor and limit excessive injection speeds.

Problems solved by technology

Whichever method is used, the operator hopes to be in the immediate vicinity to the nerve (which is necessary for reliable nerve blocks) and not in the nerve itself (which may result in traumatic nerve injury when the local anesthetic is injected into the nerve).

Consequently, with these three described methods for localizing nerves during nerve blocks, the needle tip may inadvertently be inserted into the nerve itself.

The resultant injection directly into the nerve(s) may result in significant nerve injury.

However, one of the major disadvantages of regional anesthesia and nerve blocks in particular is the possibility of nerve damage during administration of nerve blocks or regional anesthesia.

Other drawbacks include the risks of systemic and local toxic complications.

Thus, it may not be surprising that the most common and troublesome local complications of nerve blocks and regional anesthesia involve the peripheral nerves.

Such complications are, fortunately, rare, but they can cause considerable problems for both patient and physician.

Of note, even the most careful anesthesiologist will occasionally encounter a PNS complication.

While the overall incidence of nerve damage after nerve blocks is relatively low, the consequences can be catastrophic and result in a temporary or permanent injury to the nerve, loss of limb function and paralysis.

This in turn may result in either mechanical trauma to the nerve, ischemic injury to the nerve due the resultant increase in endoneural pressure due to the high pressures inside the nerve, and / or endoneral edema.

During this period, the nerve fascicle is both ischemic and vulnerable to otherwise toxicologically neutral local anesthetic solutions.

Similar conditions can also occur in humans, and admixture of epinephrine with local anesthetic can enhance ischemia when injected intraneuronally and thus increase the risk of nerve injury.

However, these judgments are prone to subjective interpretation and / or the “feel” of the operators and not on any objective measurements (e.g., measured injection pressure, speed, or similar variables).

The ability of different operators to estimate and / or control the injection (especially as with regard to pressure) is further complicated by differences in hand strength and experience among operators as well as differences in resistance to injection for various needle types, lengths, and lumen calibers.

This practice poses a risk of exerting too high pressures during injection and possible unrecognized intraneuronal injection.

In addition, the operator typically uses both hands to perform the procedure (i.e., place the injection needle in the appropriate location relative to the nerve) and cannot easily determine and / or control the amount of force and pressure that the assistant may employ to inject the local anesthetic.

Moreover, forceful and / or fast injections of local anesthetic solutions can lead to a higher risk of systemic local anesthetic toxicity (e.g., seizures, arrhythmia, cardiovascular collapse, and death) due to tracking of local anesthetic between tissue layers and inadvertent intravascular injections.

Additionally, intraneuronal and rapid injections of local anesthetics can backtrack to the spinal column and result in unintended epidural or spinal anesthesia with potentially disastrous consequences (Selander et al., “Longitudal Spread of Intraneurally Injected Local Anesthetics,” Acta Anesth. Scand., 22, 622 (1978); Tetzlaff et al., “Subdural Anesthesia as a Complication of an lnterscalene Brachial Plexus Block,” Regional Anesthesia, 19, 357-359 (1994); Dutton et al., “Total Spinal Anesthesia after Interscalene Blockade of the Brachial Plexus,” Anesthesiology, 80, 939-941 (1994)).

None of these attempts, however, focused on controlling and / or measuring the pressure and / or injection speed during injection to avoid an inadvertent intraneuronal injection, or rapid spread, and / or absorption of local anesthetics during nerve blockade / regional anesthesia.

Images