System for dispensing biological fluids

Abstract

Systems, including methods and apparatus, for dispensing biological fluids, such as allergens.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCES[0001]This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 678,005, filed Feb. 22, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,418,981, which in turn is a continuation of PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT / US05 / 31385, filed Sep. 2, 2005, now expired, which in turn claims priority under U.S. and international law (including but not limited to the Paris Convention and 35 U.S.C. § 120) to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 933,849, filed Sep. 2, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,398,802. These applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.INTRODUCTION[0002]An allergy is an untoward reaction of the body's immune system to a foreign substance. The foreign substance may be known as an allergen (an allergy generating substance) and / or an antigen (an antibody generating substance). The immune system is made up of two parts: the antibody-mediated system and the cell-mediated system. Allergic reactions to allergens have been classified i...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0004]Management of allergic disease involves three major strategies: avoidance of the allergen, medications to block the allergic reaction, and / or immunotherapy. Of these, immunotherapy may be the most practical and effective, because it involves long-term desensitization to particular allergens by systemic exposure to controlled levels of these allergens. Immunotherapy involves making a vaccine from the various allergen extracts to which a patient is sensitive. For example, the patient might have positive skin tests to extracts from tree pollen, grass pollen, and cat dander. A vaccine may be prepared by mixing these extracts in a vial (the “patient's vial”) and then diluting the mixed extracts to a level that the patient can tolerate for injection. Immunotherapy generally involves injection of increasing doses (decreasing dilutions) of the mixture over time, such as over the course of months or years, to a level that may be much higher than (in some cases several orders of magnitude greater than) the initial dose. This approach decreases the sensitivity of the patient to the injected mixture (and thus the injected allergens) and hopefully helps control the underlying allergic disease.

[0006]FIG. 1 shows a series of configurations produced by performance of a common method 20 for sterile transfer of a selected allergen 22. The allergen 22 may be provided as a sterile extract in liquid, contained in a stock vial 24. The stock vial may be generally transparent and may be sealed at its mouth with a closure 26, such as a resilient (elastomeric) septum 28. Septum 28 may be held in place by a retainer 30 extending around the neck of the vial 24, and particularly around a collar or flange formed on the neck of the vial. Retainer 30 also may extend partially over the exterior surface of the septum to leave an exposed region 32 of the septum for access to the interior of the vial with a hollow-bore needle (or other conduit). The needle may be used to pierce the septum, to provide fluid communication with the interior (the fluid contents) of the vial. Since the septum is elastomeric, after the needle pierces the septum, the needle and septum may be disposed in sealed engagement, circumferentially around the needle, in a configuration that prevents fluid leakage around the needle. The allergen 22 may be transferred to a patient's vial 34, which may be of generally similar construction to the stock vial, but often smaller in size. Transfer may be performed with a syringe 36 having a barrel 38 with graduations for volume measurement and a hollow-bore needle 40 for penetration of septum 28.

Problems solved by technology

However, this commonly used method for preparation of allergen mixtures may have a number of drawbacks.

Over time, the allergens in the stock vials thus may be physically and / or chemically damaged (such as denaturation, oxidation, and / or cleavage of allergen proteins), with unpredictable changes in allergen potency that may affect diagnosis or treatment of patients using the allergens.

Furthermore, this common method of preparing allergen mixtures may be too labor intensive, wasteful of syringes, unsafe, and / or prone to contamination and / or human error, among others.

Images