Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Methods for treating acute and subchronic pain

a technology of acute and subchronic pain and analgesics, applied in the field of opioid-induced analgesia, can solve the problems of ineffective opioid analgesics in certain pain conditions, unpleasant dose limitation side effects, and the morphine and related opioids' analgesic benefits can be accompanied by other undesirable effects, so as to achieve the effect of eliminating acute or subchronic pain

Inactive Publication Date: 2008-07-31
MEDICINOVA INC
View PDF37 Cites 16 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0015]A therapeutic dosage amount of ibudilast or an opioid analgesic may be achieved by intermittent administration, or administration once daily (i.e., in a single dose), twice daily (i.e., in two separate doses), three times daily, or may be administered as multiple doses over a time course of several days, weeks, or even months. Such administering is typically over a duration of time effective to result in a diminution, and ideally elimination or even reversal, of acute or subchronic pain. Exemplary durations of treatment include at least about one week, from 1 week to 1 month, from two weeks to 2 months, up to about 6 months, up to about 12 months or even longer. In one particular embodiment, treatment lasts from about 1 week to about 50 weeks. In a preferred embodiment of the treatment method, the administering is over a duration of time effective to result in elimination of acute or subchronic pain.
[0016]In a further embodiment, the ibudilast and opioid analgesic are administered in combination with one or more other agents effective for treating pain. Such agents include analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antidepressants. In various embodiments, one or more agents are selected from the group consisting of buprenorphine, naloxone, methadone, levomethadyl acetate, L-alpha acetylmethadol (LAAM), hydroxyzine, diphenoxylate, atropine, chlordiazepoxide, carbamazepine, mianserin, benzodiazepine, phenoziazine, disulfuram, acamprosate, topiramate, ondansetron, sertraline, bupropion, amantadine, amiloride, isradipine, tiagabine, baclofen, propranolol, tricyclic antidepressants, desipramine, carbamazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, doxepin, fluoxetine, imipramine, moclobemide, nortriptyline, paroxetine, sertraline, tryptophan, venlafaxine, trazodone, quetiapine, zolpidem, zopiclone, zaleplon, gabapentin, memantine, pregabalin, cannabinoids, tramadol, duloxetine, milnacipran, naltrexone, paracetamol, metoclopramide, loperamide, clonidine, lofexidine, and diazepam.
[0017]In another aspect, the invention provides a composition or combination effective for treating acute or subchronic pain. The composition comprises a combination of: (i) ibudilast, (ii) an opioid analgesic (e.g., morphine, oxycodone, or related opioids), and (iii) optionally one or more additional agents effective for treating acute or subchronic pain, wherein each of the components is either contained in a single composition or dosage form (such as in an admixture), or is present as a discrete or separate entity (e.g., in a kit). A composition of the invention may optionally include one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
[0018]In yet another aspect, the invention encompasses a kit comprising ibudilast, for the treatment of acute or subchronic pain, and additional agents effective for treating acute or subchronic pain, for simultaneous, sequential or separate use, as well as instructions for use of the agents.
[0019]These and other embodiments of the subject invention will readily occur to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.

Problems solved by technology

However, the analgesic benefit of morphine and related opioids can be accompanied by other undesirable side effects involving the central nervous system and gastrointestinal system including drowsiness, respiratory depression, constipation, nausea and vomiting.
There are significant adverse (respiratory depression) and unpleasant dose limiting side effects.
Compounding the issue even further is evidence that opioid analgesics are ineffective in certain pain conditions (including certain neuropathic syndromes).
The combination of dose limiting side effects and the potential development of tolerance which requires increases in analgesic requirements results in many patients who are left without adequate pain relief by opioids.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Methods for treating acute and subchronic pain
  • Methods for treating acute and subchronic pain
  • Methods for treating acute and subchronic pain

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Treatment with Ibudilast Intraperitoneally Shortly Before Subcutaneous Administration of Morphine or Oxycodone

A. Materials and Methods

[0137]Animals

[0138]Pathogen-free adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-375 g; Harlan Labs, Madison, Wis.) were used in all experiments. Rats were housed in temperature (23±3° C.) and light (12 h: 12 h light:dark cycle; lights on at 0700) controlled rooms with standard rodent chow and water available ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Colorado at Boulder. Each study represents an n=6 per group.

[0139]Drugs

[0140]Morphine sulfate and oxycodone hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo., USA). Morphine and oxycodone were administered subcutaneously at 4 mg / kg in a dose volume of 1 ml / kg in sterile injection normal saline. Ibudilast was supplied by Avigen (Alameda, Calif., USA). Ibudilast was administered intraperitoneally at 7.5 mg / kg in a dose volume of 2.5 ml / kg in 3...

experiment 1

B. Ability of Ibudilast to Induce Analgesia Alone

[0145]Following baseline withdrawal latency assessments (−45 min), animals received ibudilast or vehicle and were tested again 10 min later to determine if ibudilast or vehicle had any effect on withdrawal latencies. At this time (time 0), the animals received a subcutaneous saline injection (1 ml / kg) to control for conditions in Experiment 2 (see below). Animals were then tested every 10 minutes for 80 min alternating high and low intensity Hargreaves tests.

[0146]As shown in FIGS. 1A-1D, administering ibudilast (7.5 mg / kg intraperitoneally in a dose volume of 2.5 ml / kg in 35% PEG in injection saline) or vehicle (35% PEG in injection saline) had no significant influence on either tail (FIGS. 1A and 1B) or paw (FIGS. 1C and 1D) withdrawal latencies in either the high intensity (FIGS. 1A and 1C) or low intensity (FIGS. 1B and 1D) Hargreaves test. A subsequent subcutaneous saline injection also produced no significant nociceptive change...

experiment 2

C. Ability of Ibudilast to Potentiate Morphine Analgesia

[0147]Following baseline withdrawal latency assessments (−45 min), animals received ibudilast or vehicle (−30 min) and were tested again at −10 min. At time 0, animals received a subcutaneous morphine injection (4 mg / kg in a dose volume of 1 ml / kg in injection saline) and were tested every 10 minutes for 230 min alternating high and low intensity Hargreaves tests.

[0148]As shown in FIGS. 2A-2D, administering ibudilast (7.5 mg / kg intraperitoneally in a dose volume of 2.5 ml / kg in 35% PEG in injection saline) 30 min prior to administration of morphine significantly enhanced the pain suppressive effects of morphine on tail (FIGS. 2A and 2B) and paw (FIGS. 2C and 2D) withdrawal latencies in high (FIGS. 2A and 2C) and low (FIGS. 2B and 2D) intensity Hargreaves tests. Thus, while having little to no effect on its own in the absence of morphine, the glial activation inhibitor ibudilast, when co-administered with morphine, enhanced the...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
particle sizeaaaaaaaaaa
timeaaaaaaaaaa
depthaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

Methods of potentiating opioid-induced analgesia in a subject by administration of a phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor or glial attenuator are described. In particular, the present invention is directed to methods of treating or preventing acute or subchronic pain by administration of a PDE inhibitor or glial attenuator, such as ibudilast (3-isobutyryl-2-isopropylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine), in combination with an opioid.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION[0001]This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e)(1) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60 / 898,362, filed Jan. 30, 2007, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The present invention relates generally to potentiation of opioid-induced analgesia in a subject by administration of a phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor or glial attenuator. In particular, the present invention pertains to methods of treating or preventing acute or subchronic pain by administration of a PDE inhibitor or glial attenuator, such as ibudilast (3-isobutyryl-2-isopropylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine; also termed AV411 herein), in combination with an opioid analgesic.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]In recent years, pain management has become an area of increasing focus in the medical profession, partly due to the growing population of elderly, issues surrounding quality of life, and the growing numbers o...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A61K38/43A61P25/04
CPCA61K31/437A61K31/485A61K45/06A61K38/00A61K2300/00A61P25/04
Inventor JOHNSON, KIRK W.WATKINS, LINDA R.HUTCHINSON, MARK
Owner MEDICINOVA INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products