Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Feed withdrawal compositions and methods

a composition and composition technology, applied in the field of feed withdrawal compositions and methods, can solve the problems of reducing the yield of salable products, contaminating the carcass from ingesta and/or fecal materials, and negative effects on product quality

Inactive Publication Date: 2002-10-24
VASILATOS YOUNKEN REGINA
View PDF0 Cites 1 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

The latter is of primary importance, in that failure to properly empty the GIT may result in contamination of the carcass from ingesta and / or fecal material during processing.
During the feed withdrawal period, however, particularly if this period is prolonged, the yield of salable product is reduced, and negative effects on product quality due to tissue dehydration, etc. can result.
In addition, as the period of withdrawal continues, progressive loss (breakdown) of the intestinal lining (mucosa) occurs, with thinning of the gut wall and liquification of its contents.
This dramatically increases the risk for microbial contamination during mechanical evisceration and subsequent steps in processing.
The process of feed withdrawal is a balancing act, with less than ideal results, even under the best circumstances.
With no feed withdrawal, the upper portion of the GIT is generally filled with feed particles that vary in consistency and moisture content, depending upon region of the tract and stage of digestion, with the upper portion of the tract particularly at risk for regurgitation of contents during handling and processing of the animal.
Once feed is withdrawn, the upper portion of the tract empties, however, emptying of the lower portion tends to decline beyond a certain time period.
This increases the risk for fecal contamination and "watery guts" syndrome, particularly if total time without feed extends beyond 12 hours, a situation that realistically does occur in commercial practice.
However, the issue of carcass contamination and related food safety issues are of paramount concern to the industry.
Also, because of the high solubility and digestibility of the formulated product, the time required to empty the upper portion of the gastrointestinal tract of composition is nominal in comparison to conventional feed withdrawal periods.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Materials and Methods

[0031] One hundred fifty, six-week-old female broiler chickens of a commercial cross were allocated to six pens (25 birds per pen). Birds were selected to have comparable body weights and were leg banded. Two pens (50 birds) were assigned to each of three treatments as follows:

[0032] 1). 12 hour feed withdrawal prior to processing, representing the average time commonly practiced by the commercial poultry industry. This served as a control group.

[0033] 2). Composition MD-0 (starch hydrolysate-based composition with no protein added)

[0034] 3). Composition MD-16 (starch hydrolysate-based composition with 16% dried egg albumin added by weight).

[0035] In this example, the brands Maltrin-150 and Maltrin-180 of starch hydrolysate were used. However, as can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, any starch hydrolysate-based composition may be used for purposes of this invention.

[0036] Both composition groups had salts and vitamins added to them (Table 5 supra). To...

example 2

Evaluation of Starch Hydrolysate-Based Feed Withdrawal Compositions: Effects on Live Weight Changes and Carcass Measurements

[0044] Physical Form: White pellets

[0045] Acclimation Period: Included

[0046] Composition Formulations: Table 5

Materials and Methods

[0047] Day-old, male broiler chicks (n=125) were raised in floor pens on litter. Birds were fed a commercial broiler starter diet (Wenger Feeds, Rheems, Pa.; #1092-52; 23% CP, 4.5% fat, and 3100 Kcal / kg) from hatching until 3 weeks of age, then switched to a commercial broiler grower diet (Wenger Feeds, Rheems, Pa.; #1093-53; 18% CP, 4% fat, 3200 Kcal / kg) for the remainder of the trial. At six weeks of age, birds were wing banded and allocated to 6 different pens with 12 birds each. Two pens each were assigned to one of three treatments:

[0048] (1) Control Group:

[0049] Phase I (8 hr)--Consumed commercial broiler feed ad libitum.

[0050] Phase II (12 hr)--Subjected to conventional feed withdrawal (FW) for 12 hr prior to slaughter.

[0051]...

example 3

Evaluation of Starch Hydrolysate-Based Feed Withdrawal Compositions: Effects on Live Weight Changes

[0064] Physical Form: Colored (greenish / tan), amorphous aggregates

[0065] Acclimation Period: Not included

[0066] Composition Formulations: Table 6

Materials and Methods

[0067] Day-old male broiler chicks (n=45) were placed in floor pens (15 birds per pen). Chicks consumed commercial broiler starter diet (Wenger Feeds, Rheems, Pa.; #1092-52; 23%, CP, 4.5% fat, and 3100 Kcal / kg) from hatching until 3 weeks of age, and were then switched to a commercial broiler grower diet (Wenger Feeds, Rheems, Pa.; # 1093-55; 18% CP, 4% fat, 3200 Kcal / kg) from 3 to 6 weeks of age. Feed and water were supplied ad libitum. At six weeks of age, groups were culled to ten birds per pen, and wing banded. Each pen was assigned to one of three treatments:

[0068] (1) Control Group: Received conventional feed withdrawal (FW) for 12 hr prior to slaughter.

[0069] (2) MD0: Broiler feed was withdrawn and birds received MD...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
timeaaaaaaaaaa
timeaaaaaaaaaa
energyaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

A feed withdrawal composition is described which includes at least 70% by weight of a low D.E. starch hydrolysate. Due to the high solubility and digestibility characteristics of the composition, the composition may be fed to the animal up to 1-2 hours prior to slaughter. The composition results in (1) improvement in live weight at slaughter; (2) increased product yield and / or quality; and (3) reduced risk of carcass contamination in comparison to conventional programs of total feed withdrawal prior to slaughter.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of copending, commonly assigned provisional applications Serial No. 60 / 117,068 filed Jan. 25, 1999, and Serial No. 60 / 096,074 filed Aug. 11, 1998, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.BACKGROUND OF THE INVTION[0002] At the end of grow-out, feed is typically withdrawn from meat producing monogastric animals for a period of time prior to livehaul, in order to minimize feed wastage and empty the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of contents. The latter is of primary importance, in that failure to properly empty the GIT may result in contamination of the carcass from ingesta and / or fecal material during processing. During the feed withdrawal period, however, particularly if this period is prolonged, the yield of salable product is reduced, and negative effects on product quality due to tissue dehydration, etc. can result. In addition, as the period of withdrawal continues, progr...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A23K1/16A23K1/175A23K1/18
CPCA23K1/1631A23K1/1826A23K1/18A23K1/1643A23K20/147A23K20/163A23K50/00A23K50/75
Inventor VASILATOS-YOUNKEN, REGINA
Owner VASILATOS YOUNKEN REGINA
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products