Processing C4 olefin streams for the maximum production of propylene
A technology for olefin materials and streams, which can be used in chemical instruments and methods, sustainable manufacturing/processing, chemical industry, etc., and can solve problems such as loss of propylene production
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0054] Conventional treatment with high ethylene content
[0055] In this case, 2750 kg / hr of fresh ethylene was utilized for a n-butene flow of 6651 kg / hr. This is 0.41 weight ratio or 0.85 fresh feed mole ratio. The material balances are summarized in Table B.
[0056] Step 1: First put C 4 The feed is sent to catalytic distillation DIB column 14 where 9054 kg / hr of isobutene and isobutane are removed as overhead product 16 . Bottom product 18 (9570 kg / hr) is a stream of substantially pure 2-butene mixed with paraffins.
[0057] Step 2: Bottoms stream 18 with fresh ethylene 19 and recycled ethylene from deethanizer 24 with 4 The combined recycles 34 of the fractionation system 30 (after venting 36 ) are mixed and fed to the metathesis unit 22 . The metathesis unit contains metathesis and double bond isomerization catalysts. With a one-pass n-butene conversion of 59%, the molar selectivity to propylene was 99%. Selectivity is defined as the number of moles of propylene...
Embodiment 2
[0064] Regular Moderate Ethylene
[0065] In a second example, half the ethylene was available (1375 kg / hr fresh ethylene). This represents an ethylene to n-butene ratio of 0.21 weight fraction or 0.43 mole fraction. The material balances are summarized in Table C.
[0066] Step 1: This is the same as Example 1, for a conventional metathesis unit, yielding a feed of 9570 kg / hr (18,624 minus 9054).
[0067] Step 2: Selectivity to propylene decreases due to reduction of ethylene. The molar selectivity dropped from 99% to 88.8%. Under these conditions, ethylene conversion was higher (66% versus 40%) and butene conversion was lower (36.5 versus 59).
[0068] Step 3: Recovery and recycling of ethylene.
[0069] Step 4: Recover propylene. Propylene production decreased from 8164 kg / hr to 5110 kg / hr due to lower ethylene flow. 37% lower.
[0070] Step 5: Unreacted C 4 with most of the C produced by the lower selectivity reaction 5 recycle together. The combination of lower...
Embodiment 3
[0073] Regular Low Ethylene
[0074] In this final example for the conventional case, the fresh ethylene is almost zero (590 kg / hr). This represents a fresh ethylene / n-butenes ratio of 0.08 by weight or 0.18 by mole. The material balances are summarized in Table D.
[0075] Step 1: This is the same, for a conventional metathesis unit, a feed of 9570 kg / hr is produced.
[0076] Step 2: Selectivity to propylene is worse due to further reduction of ethylene. The overall molar selectivity dropped from 88.8% to 76.8%. This is equivalent to C 4 57.6% selectivity. Under these conditions, butene conversion was essentially the same (37.3 vs. 36.5 in Example 2).
[0077] Step 3: Recovery and recycling of ethylene. Due to the low level of fresh ethylene, this flow is very small.
[0078] Step 4: Recover propylene. Propylene production decreased from 5110 kg / hr to 3521 kg / hr due to very low ethylene flow. This is only 43% of the yield of Example 1.
[0079] Step 5: Unreacted C ...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com