Blood transfusion medical record quality evaluation model
A technology of quality evaluation and medical records, applied in the field of clinical blood transfusion management, can solve the problems of ineffective incentives for clinical writing doctors, poor scientificity, etc., and achieve the effect of reducing the occurrence of adverse blood transfusion reactions and adverse events.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0022] Embodiment 1 Construction of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system
[0023] Based on the "Administrative Measures for Clinical Blood Use in Medical Institutions", "Technical Specifications for Clinical Blood Transfusion", and "Guidelines for the Implementation of Accreditation Standards for Tertiary General Hospitals", a multi-dimensional evaluation was established by using the Covariance-Analytic Hierarchy Process (Cov-AHP) fuzzy evaluation method System, extract the key elements of each dimension, establish an evaluation system of 4 dimensions, extract the key elements of each dimension, and then form a scoring team composed of blood transfusion department and clinical experts to score according to importance, select and retain 15 indicators. Finally, a medical record quality evaluation index system with 3 levels, 4 dimensions, and 15 evaluation indexes was constructed, as shown in Table 1.
[0024] Table 1. Evaluation system of blood transfusion medical records
[0...
Embodiment 2
[0026] Example 2 Cov-AHP-based index weighting
[0027] 2.1 Establish scoring matrix
[0028] After clarifying the concept, meaning and judgment criteria of the matrix, the members of the expert group scored the relative importance of indicators at the same level according to the 1-9 scale method. See Table 2 to construct a scoring matrix.
[0029] Table 2, 1-9 scaling method
[0030]
[0031]
[0032] 2.2 Establish a comprehensive judgment matrix and consistency verification
[0033] According to the scoring matrix of each expert, the covariance matrix (A) is calculated, as shown in Table 3.
[0034] Table 3. Covariance matrix (A)
[0035] U U 1
U 2
… U i
… U j
… U n
U 1
c 11
c 12
… c 1i
… c 1i
… c 1n
U 2
c 21
c 22
… c 2i
… c 2j
… c 2n
… … … … … … … … … U i
c i1
c i2
… c ii
… c ij
… c in
… … … … … … … … … U n
c n1 ...
Embodiment 3
[0062] Example 3 Establishing Scoring Criteria for Blood Transfusion Medical Records
[0063] Based on the calculation and statistical results of Example 2, establish a blood transfusion medical record quality evaluation model or claim a blood transfusion medical record scoring standard, which is a mathematical model as shown in the following formula:
[0064] F=0.1111*Score of related examinations before blood transfusion+0.0443*Score of applicant’s professional title+0.0438*Score of application variety / volume+0.0456*Score of first page of medical record+0.1456*Score of blood transfusion consent form+0.1001*Score of blood transfusion course record+0.0344*Requisition form for blood transfusion Score+0.1032*intraoperative blood transfusion record score+0.0591*transfusion correction / objective score+0.1179*blood transfusion efficacy evaluation score+0.0677*blood transfusion adverse reaction score+0.0342*score from blood collection time to blood transfusion time+0.0314*crossmatch b...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com