A method of evaluating the academic level of a subject

Abstract

The invention discloses a method of evaluating the academic level of a subject. The evaluation method comprises: obtaining a paper pool for academic level evaluation, cleaning journal data in the paper pool and calculating a journal impact factor standard value IFNOR=IFV / lambda; constructing the reference periodicals and the paper matrix are constructed, and calculating the value of the referenceperiodicals RFV _ d = Sigma IFNOR; constructing subject and paper matrix, calculating subject reference journal value RFV _ s = Sigma RFV _ d; The academic level of each discipline was evaluated according to the RFV_s value of each discipline. RFV_s are used in this application as an evaluation index of academic competence of scientific research institutions, RFV_s is determined by the standard value of journal impact factor, and can be assigned as soon as the paper is published. The unique forward-looking attribute of RFV_s can help institutions and other evaluation scope to understand the academic level of various disciplines within the scope, and to formulate a long-term mechanism of discipline development according to their own financial and material resources. The RFV_s is determinedby the standard value of journal impact factor.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the field of scientific research management and academic level evaluation, and in particular relates to an evaluation method of the academic level of a subject. Background technique [0002] At present, when evaluating the academic level of a discipline, in addition to inviting experts in this field to conduct qualitative human evaluation, some quantitative indicators are generally used to evaluate academic papers. Papers are the most basic elements in the evaluation of the academic level of a discipline, so these quantitative indicators usually use papers as the entry point and the number of citations of papers as a pointer. The citation frequency of a paper refers to the number of times a paper is cited by the academic community after it is published. It is a quantitative expression of the degree of recognition of the academic value of the paper by the academic community and a characterization of the quality of the paper. ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] When evaluating the academic level of a discipline, the disadvantages of using the citation frequency of papers as an indicator are: (1) The citation frequency of papers has been branded as "retrospective" since the date of its birth

[0004] The citation frequency of a subject is the citation frequency of the papers in the subject. The shortcomings of the evaluation system quantified by the citation frequency of a subject are: (1) There is no unified quantitative evaluation standard for the comparison of academic levels between different disciplines, The classification of disciplines is intricate and the differences in the classification standards of disciplines directly lead to fluctuations in evaluation results; at this stage, if an institution wants to understand the relative academic level of each discipline in its institution through the current evaluation system, it is hoped that it will It is almost impossible to optimize the subject setting; (2) The existing widely recognized ESI index for 22 major subjects in WOS (ie Web Of Science, the same below) is too broad, ESI indicators have very limited guiding significance for scientific research institutions to improve their scientific research management level, and have no substantive guiding significance for the development direction of scientific research.

Images