Executor input saturation control method of automobile active suspension system
A technology of active suspension and control method, applied in suspension, elastic suspension, transportation and packaging, etc., can solve the problems such as the inability to meet the control performance of the suspension system, the inability to deal with the influence of the system control performance, etc., so as to improve the driving comfort. degree, to meet the control performance, to improve the effect of comfort
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
specific Embodiment approach 1
[0023] Specific Embodiment 1: The actuator input saturation control method of an active suspension system of an automobile according to this embodiment is specifically prepared according to the following steps:
[0024] Step 1, establishing a nonlinear uncertain time-delay active suspension system model;
[0025] Step 2, deriving an adaptive backstepping recursive controller based on the instruction filter;
[0026] Step 3, adjusting the control gain parameters of the adaptive backstepping recursive controller, that is, completing a control method for actuator input saturation of an active suspension system of an automobile, as follows: figure 1 shown.
[0027] The effect of this implementation mode:
[0028] This embodiment proposes an input saturation control method for the actuator of the active suspension system. Considering the uncertainty of the actuator parameters in the actual vehicle and the vertical dynamic response of the vehicle body, an adaptive backstepping rec...
specific Embodiment approach 2
[0030] Specific embodiment 2: The difference between this embodiment and specific embodiment 1 is that the establishment of the nonlinear uncertain time-delay active suspension system model in step 1 is:
[0031] According to Newton's second law, the dynamic equation of the active suspension system can be expressed as:
[0032] m s z . . 1 + F d ( z . 1 , t ) + F s ( z 1 , t ) = u ( t ) + F l ( ...
specific Embodiment approach 3
[0047] Embodiment 3: The difference between this embodiment and Embodiment 1 or 2 is that the specific parameters of formulas (1) to (7) for establishing a nonlinear uncertain time-delay active suspension system model are as follows: sprung mass: m s =100kg; Linear stiffness coefficient of spring assembly: k s1 =1500N / m; the nonlinear stiffness coefficient of the spring assembly: Damping coefficient of spring assembly damper: c m =1095Ns / m; the maximum output force of the actuator is u max =500N. Other steps and parameters are the same as those in Embodiment 1 or Embodiment 2.
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com