Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

SARS Vaccine Compositions and Methods of Making and Using Them

a composition and vaccine technology, applied in the field of delipidation methods, can solve the problems of severe damage to the body, extreme suffering, morbidity and mortality, and enormous economic burden on society, and achieve the effects of simple, effective and efficient methods, and positive immunologic responses

Inactive Publication Date: 2009-01-15
ELI LILLY & CO +1
View PDF99 Cites 21 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0026]The present invention solves the problems described above by providing a simple, effective and efficient method for treating and preventing viral infection. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a simple, effective and efficient method for treating and preventing SARS viral infection. The method of the present invention affects the lipid envelope of a virus by utilizing an efficient solvent system, which does not denature or destroy the virus. The present invention employs an optimal solvent and energy system to create, via delipidation, a non-synthetic, host-derived or non host-derived modified viral particle that has its lipid envelope at least partially removed, generating a positive immunologic response when administered to a patient, thereby providing that patient with some degree of protection against the virus. It is believed that these modified viral particles have at least one antigen exposed that was not exposed prior to the delipidation process.
[0027]The present invention is also effective in producing an autologous, patient-specific therapeutic vaccine against the virus, by treating a biological fluid containing the virus such that the virus is present in a modified form, with reduced infectivity, and such that an immune response is initiated upon reintroduction of the fluid with reduced lipid content into the patient. This autologous method ensures that patient specific antigens, for example patient specific viral antigens, are introduced into the same patient from which they were obtained to induce an immune response. This is an important feature since a patient's physiology may modify the antigens present in an infectious organism such as a virus. To create the vaccine, a biological fluid (for example, blood) is removed from the patient, the plasma is separated from the blood and treated to reduce the lipid content of the virus in the plasma using an optimal solvent system. A lipid-containing virus, treated in this manner in order to reduce its infectivity and create a modified viral particle with reduced lipid content is administered to a patient, such as an animal or a human, optionally together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, in order to initiate an immune response in the animal or human and create antibodies that bind the exposed epitopes of the modified viral particle. Adjuvants may also be administered with the modified viral particle in the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or separately.
[0028]The present method is also employed to produce non-autologous vaccines, wherein biological fluids with lipid containing viruses from at least one animal or human are treated to produce a modified viral particle for administration into a different (non-autologous) animal or human. The present invention is also effective in producing an non-autologous, vaccine against the virus, by treating a biological fluid such as plasma obtained from an animal or a human with the present method to reduce lipid levels in the fluid and in the virus within the fluid. Such treated fluid with reduced lipid levels and containing modified virus with reduced lipid levels may be introduced into another animal or human which was not the source of the treated biological fluid. This non-autologous method is employed to vaccinate a recipient animal or human against one or more infectious organisms such as viruses. Biological fluids may be used from animals or humans infected with one or more infectious organisms such as viruses, and treated with the present methods to produce a vaccine for administration to a recipient animal or human. Alternatively, or in addition, various stock supplies of virus may be added to a biological fluid before treating the fluid with the method of the present invention to create a vaccine.

Problems solved by technology

Viruses, of varied etiology, affect billions of animals and humans each year and inflict an enormous economic burden on society.
Viruses affect animals and humans causing extreme suffering, morbidity, and mortality.
The immune system is forced to produce the “compromise”, ineffective antibodies which do not destroy the viral particles, allowing them to proliferate and slowly cause severe damage to the body, while destroying host cells.
The high mutation rate of the virus, especially in the case of HIV, is a major difficulty with existing treatments because the various strains become resistant to anti-viral drug therapy.
Furthermore, anti-viral drug therapy treatment may cause the evolution of resistant strains of the virus.
Other drawbacks to drug therapies are the undesirable side effects and patient compliance requirements.
Such individuals require even more aggressive and expensive drug regimens to counteract disease progression, which in turn cause greater side effects and a greater likelihood of multiple drug resistance.
The current methods of vaccination do have drawbacks, making them less than optimally desirable for immunizing individuals against particular pathogens, such as coronavirus and HIV.
One explanation offered in the prior art is that the antigens of these microorganisms change constantly so the antibodies produced in response to a particular antigen are no longer effective when the antigen mutates.
Although antigenic variation has been addressed via the attempted use of combination drugs or antigens, no prior art vaccine has succeeded adequately in addressing infections such as SARS.
Viral inactivation does present problems since inactivation of a virus does not provide a protective immune response against viral infection.
In addition, it is largely geared towards denaturing viral proteins, thereby destroying the structure of the viral particle.
In sum, prior art methods have largely focused on destroying, yet not suitably modifying, viral particles to produce an immune response.
In addition to dissolving the lipid envelope of the virus, the high organic solvent concentrations cause cell death and damage to the antigens.
Essentially, this method results in a “chemical kill” of the cell.
Although treating the virus with glutaraldehyde effectively delipidates the virus, it also destroys the core.
Destruction of the core is not desirable for producing a modified viral particle useful for inducing an immune response in a recipient.
Chloroform, however, denatures many plasma proteins and is not suitable for use with biological fluids, which will be reintroduced into the animal or human.
These functions are essential to life and thus damage to these proteins may have an adverse effect on a patient's health, possibly leading to death.
Further, many of the methods described in the prior art involve extensive exposure to elevated temperature in order to kill free virus and infected cells.
Elevated temperatures have deleterious effects on the proteins contained in biological fluids, such as plasma.
Attenuated vaccines (less infective and not inactivated), however, pose several problems.
First, it is difficult to ascertain when the attenuated vaccine is no longer pathogenic.
The risk of viral infection from the vaccine is too great to properly test for effective attenuation.
In addition, attenuated vaccines carry the risk of reverting into a virulent form of the pathogen.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • SARS Vaccine Compositions and Methods of Making and Using Them
  • SARS Vaccine Compositions and Methods of Making and Using Them
  • SARS Vaccine Compositions and Methods of Making and Using Them

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Development of a Modified Coronavirus Viral Particle for Use as a Vaccine

[0134]Solvent treatment technology was used to develop a modified coronavirus viral particle to use as a prophylactic vaccine against the SARS virus. In addition, solvent-treated virus that was subsequently subjected to chemical inactivation was tested for the ability to raise neutralizing antibodies and produce a cellular immune response in mice. In the following text and elsewhere in the application, the coronavirus that produces SARS is also referred to as SARS.

[0135]The SARS stocks used in the experiments were propagated at the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (LRRI), Albuquerque, N. Mex., in the laboratory of Dr. Kevin Harrod, Director of the Infectious Disease Program. The initial SARS seed stock was provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Supernatants from SARS infected VERO cells were then sent to Dr. Erdman at the CDC for inactivation by gamma irradiation.

[0136]The delipidation proces...

experiment # 1

Experiment #1 Evaluation of Three Different Delipidation Methods for SARS

[0180]The particles obtained by three delipidation processes were tested with respect to generating an immune response. The experiment was designed with three mice per group testing the following three groups:

A. Inactivated SARS treated with 3% DIPE;

B. Inactivated SARS treated with DIPE / n-BuOH (95:5); and,

C. Inactivated SARS treated with 3% DIPE / 0.05% Triton X-100.

[0181]Mice were vaccinated sc with 50 μg of inactivated delipidated SARS in 50 μl in one footpad. At three weeks post vaccination, mice were sacrificed, and serum was harvested.

[0182]Serum aliquots were sent to the laboratory of Dr. Michael W. Cho (Case Western Reserve University), where SARS neutralization titers were evaluated using a neutralization assay for SARS using pseudotyped murine leukemia virus (MuLV) with the Spike protein of SARS-CoV (or VSV-G as a negative control) as previously described (Han et al., 2004 Virology. 326:140-149). SARS NC...

experiment # 2

Experiment #2 SARS-Dose Escalation Study of Optimally Delipidated SARS Vaccine

[0192]The objective of this study was to test three different concentrations of delipidated inactivated purified SARS with inactivated purified SARS only, at 0.1 μg, 1 μg, and 10 μg boosts. Mice (3 mice / group) were primed with SARS supernatant (virus was unpurified) obtained from LRRI that was γ-irradiated by Dr. Erdman at the CDC and had a protein concentration of 4 mg / ml. Mice were primed using Incomplete Freunds Adjuvant sc with 100 μg total protein in a volume of 500 μl. Two weeks later, mice were boosted with the appropriate concentration of delipidated SARS, or inactivated SARS in a volume of 500 μl administered sc. Four weeks after the booster injection, mice were sacrificed and serum collected and sent to Dr. Cho for neutralizing antibody titers. Serum IgG titers to SARS NC and Spike were performed at Lipid Sciences, Inc.

Results

[0193]FIG. 6 illustrates the Spike Ab titers from Experiment #2, compar...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
pressuresaaaaaaaaaa
temperaturesaaaaaaaaaa
temperatureaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

Described is a composition and method for reducing the occurrence and severity of infectious diseases, especially infectious diseases such as SARS, in which lipid-containing infectious viral organisms are found in biological fluids, such as blood. The present invention employs solvents useful for extracting lipids from the lipid-containing infectious viral organism thereby creating immunogenic modified, partially delipidated viral particles with reduced infectivity. The present invention provides delipidated viral vaccine compositions, such as therapeutic vaccine compositions, comprising these modified, partially delipidated viral particles with reduced infectivity, optionally combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or an immunostimulant. The vaccine composition is administered to a patient to provide protection against the lipid-containing infectious viral organism or, in case of a therapeutic vaccine, to treat or alleviate infection against the lipid-containing infections viral organism. The vaccine compositions of the present invention include combination vaccines of modified viral particles obtained from one or more strains of a virus and / or one or more types of virus.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 11 / 401,434 filed Apr. 10, 2006 which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60 / 670,574, filed Apr. 11, 2005, U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60 / 669,738, filed Apr. 8, 2005, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 10 / 873,015, filed Jun. 21, 2004, which is a continuation in part of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 10 / 601,656 filed Jun. 20, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 10 / 311,679 filed Dec. 18, 2002, abandoned, which is a U.S. national phase from PCT patent application number PCT / IB01 / 01099 filed Jun. 21, 2001, which claims the benefit of Australian patent application PQ8469 filed Jun. 29, 2000 and PCT patent application number PCT / AU00 / 01603 filed Dec. 28, 2000. The present application also claims the ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A61K39/215C12N7/01
CPCA61K39/12A61K2039/5158A61K2039/5258C07K14/005C12N7/00C12N2730/10022C12N2770/24322C12N2730/10162C12N2740/15022C12N2740/16122C12N2770/20022C12N2770/20034C12N2770/20062C12N2730/10122A61K2039/5252A61K2039/545A61K2039/55566A61P11/00A61P31/14A61P37/04
Inventor AKEEFE, HASSIBULLAHKITABWALLA, MOIZ
Owner ELI LILLY & CO
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products