Disposable laryngeal mask airway device

Abstract

The disclosed laryngeal mask airway device includes a mask portion and an airway tube. The mask portion includes an inflatable cuff, which defines a central opening when the cuff is inflated. The airway tube defines an internal passage extending from a proximal end of the tube to a distal end of the tube. The airway tube further defines two or more tabs disposed near the distal end of the tube. The mask portion is coupled to the airway tube near the distal end of the airway tube, and the tabs extend from the airway tube into the central opening defined by the cuff when the cuff is inflated.

Description

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is a divisional of and claims priority under 35 U.S.C., §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 138,806, filed May 3, 2002, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, and which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60 / 314,438, entitled “Disposable LMA,” which was filed Aug. 23, 2001, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. [0002] This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 544,681 entitled “Disposable LMA”, filed on Apr. 7, 2000 (Attorney Docket No. LMA-003, 108195-120), now U.S. Pat. No. 6,705,318, issued on Mar. 16, 2004.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] The present invention relates to a laryngeal mask airway device. More specifically, the present invention relates to reduced cost laryngeal masks, improved geometric configurations for laryngeal masks, and to methods of inexpensively fabricating suc...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

"The present invention provides improved laryngeal mask airway devices that have a reduced cost of fabrication and improved performance. The device includes a mask portion and an airway tube that are attached together using a rotational molding process. The invention also provides methods and structures for resisting compressive forces that can be generated within a patient so as to maintain an open airway passage in a laryngeal mask airway device. The invention can be applied to different embodiments and can be modified in various ways without changing its main purpose and scope."

Problems solved by technology

Although they have been enormously successful, endotracheal tubes suffer from several major disadvantages.

The principal disadvantage of the endotracheal tube relates to the difficulty of properly inserting the tube.

Also, even for skilled practitioners, insertion of an endotracheal tube is sometimes difficult or not possible.

In many instances, the difficulty of inserting endotracheal tubes has tragically led to the death of a patient because it was not possible to establish an airway in the patient with sufficient rapidity.

In addition to this principal disadvantage, there are also other disadvantages associated with endotracheal tubes.

For example, intubation with an endotracheal tube often causes patients to suffer from severe “sore throats.” The “sore throat” is principally caused by friction between the tube and the notch between the patient's arytenoid cartilages.

Another disadvantage is that patients can not cough effectively while intubated with an endotracheal tube.

Yet another problem with endotracheal tubes relates to the manner in which they are inserted.

These necessary manipulations make it difficult, or undesirable, to insert an endotracheal tube into a patient who may be suffering from a neck injury.

Still another disadvantage is that endotracheal tubes provide an airway that is relatively small or narrow.

However, one disadvantage of these materials is that they are relatively expensive.

One disadvantage of the devices disclosed in the '897 and '452 patents is that the assembly of the disclosed mask portions necessarily involves two steps: a first step of fabricating the backplate and then a second step of adhering the cuff to the top and bottom of the plate.

In addition to cost, another disadvantage of prior art laryngeal mask airway devices relates to the quality of the seal established between the patient and the device.

However, if greater pressures are applied to the proximal end of the airway tube, the seal tends to be lost thereby causing loss of some fraction of the delivered gas volume, so that positive pressure ventilation may be less effective.

Still another disadvantage of prior art laryngeal mask airway devices relates to the profile, or geometric configuration, of the deflated device.

However, prior art devices do not tend to automatically form such shapes when the cuff is deflated.

Yet another disadvantage of prior art laryngeal mask airway devices relates to the manner in which they are inserted into a patient.

Unfortunately, this procedure requires the practitioner to insert their finger into the patient's mouth and guide the device past the patient's throat.

Images