Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as a rater of other entities

a technology of entity reputation and rater, applied in the field of method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as a rater of other entities, can solve the problem that sporas does not provide a method or system for determining and maintaining a rater reputation

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-07-07
OPEN RATINGS
View PDF17 Cites 73 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

Thus, an entity may receive high ratings from other entities and thus have a high single-valued reputation, although the entity is a poor rater of other entities and thus should not truly have a high reputation as a rater of other entities.
Therefore, Sporas does not provide a method or system for determining and maintaining a rater reputation of an entity.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as a rater of other entities
  • Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as a rater of other entities
  • Method and system for ascribing a reputation to an entity as a rater of other entities

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

I. Determining a Rater Reputation

[0059] Described below is a method and system for determining a rater reputation of a first entity. Although determining a rater reputation is described below primarily in connection to ratings developed in connection with electronic exchanges, such determination may be applied to any of a variety of ratings, regardless of whether the rating is provided as a result of an electronic exchange. For example, a rating may represent a qualitative assessment of an in-person interview of a job candidate, an in-person sale or a credit transaction.

[0060] The rater reputation produced using the method and system described below may have any of a variety of applications such as, for example, assessing the trustworthiness (as a rater) of a reference, an employment recruiter, a rating agency, or any other entity that provides recommendations, scores, rankings or ratings of other entities.

[0061] A rater reputation may be determined, for one or more ratings of one...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A method and system for ascribing a reputation of an entity as a rater of other entities is provided. A first rating indicative of a rating of a rated entity by the first entity, and one or more second ratings, each second rating indicative of a rating of the rated entity provided by another entity, are provided. The second ratings are combined to produce a first combined rating. The first rating is compared to the first combined rating to produce a first rating predictability of the first rating, the first rating predictability being a negative function of a magnitude of a difference between the first rating and the first combined rating. A resulting rater reputation is generated based at least in part on the first rating predictability.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 09 / 710,008, titled “Method And System For Ascribing A Reputation To An Entity As A Rater Of Other Entities,” filed on Nov. 10, 2000, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of commonly-owned, U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60 / 209,059, titled, “Determining a Reputation of an Entity”, filed Jun. 2, 2000, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. [0002] Further, each of the following related commonly-owned U.S. patent applications: “Method and System for Ascribing a Reputation to an Entity from the Perspective of Another Entity” by Giorgos Zacharia, “System and Method for Estimating the Impacts of Multiple Ratings on a Result” by Giorgos Zacharia, “System and Method for Ascribing a Reputation to an Entity” by Giorgos Zacharia, and “System and Method for Recursively Estimating a Reputation of an Entity” by Giorgos Zacharia,...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06Q10/00G06Q30/00
CPCG06Q10/04G06Q30/0201G06Q30/02
Inventor ZACHARIA, GIORGOS C.TKACH, DMITRY
Owner OPEN RATINGS
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products

Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.

© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com