Method for synchronously detecting multiple psychotropic drugs in water body
A synchronous detection and psychiatric technology, applied in measurement devices, instruments, scientific instruments, etc., can solve the problems of limited removal efficiency, aquatic organism stress, and less attention to psychotropic drugs, and achieve stable recovery, strong selectivity, and linear relationship. Good results
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0024] (1) Water sample pretreatment
[0025] Measure 500 mL of water sample with a graduated cylinder, filter with a 0.45 μm glass fiber membrane to remove suspended particles in the water, adjust the pH to 2.5 to 3.0 with formic acid, and add internal standards carbamazepine-d10 and fluoxetine-d5.
[0026] (2) Solid phase extraction
[0027] Enrich the water sample with HLB (200mg, 6mL), activate the HLB solid-phase extraction column with 5mL methanol and 5mL ultrapure water in turn, then enrich the water sample at a flow rate of 3-5mL / min, and use Rinse the extraction column with 10mL of 5% methanol aqueous solution, pump under vacuum for 30min to remove water, and finally elute the target compound with 0.2% acetic acid methanol solvent to obtain an eluate containing the target compound, which is collected in a glass test tube.
[0028] (3) Nitrogen blowing to constant volume
[0029] The eluate containing the target compound obtained in step (2) was blown to near dryness...
Embodiment 2
[0053] The optimization of embodiment 2 extraction column
[0054] According to the method of Example 1, the difference is that the three types of solid-phase extraction columns HLB, C18, and MCX that are more common at present are specifically compared to the extraction efficiency of target pollution, as shown in Table 3, the results show that the HLB extraction column has The extraction efficiency of psychotropic drugs is significantly higher than that of C18 and MCX extraction columns, and the extraction efficiency is between 68% and 110%. Therefore, this method chooses HLB extraction column to extract the target substance.
[0055] Table 3: Extraction Efficiency of Different SPE Columns
[0056]
Embodiment 3
[0057] Example 3 Water Sample pH Effect Optimization on Extraction Efficiency
[0058] The rest of the experimental procedures are the same as in Example 1, except that the extraction efficiency of the target substance was compared under different pH conditions (pH=2.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0, 11.0) of the surface water. As shown in Table 4, the results show that the pH of the water sample is adjusted to acidic conditions, the interference of dissolved organic matter in water is removed, and the extraction column is prevented from clogging. The extraction efficiency of each substance is the highest, between 70-91%. Therefore, this experiment Adjust the pH to between 2.5-3.0.
[0059] Table 4: Extraction Efficiency of HLB Extraction Columns at Different pH
[0060]
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com