Networking and documenting digital media program examining system
A technology of digital media and film review, applied in the parts of TV system, electrical components, parts of color TV, etc. It can solve the problems of fixed, unsatisfied, and inconsistent requirements in the program review process, and reduce network bandwidth. The effect of consumption, flexible number of people, identification security and convenience
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0018] Under normal circumstances, digital media program materials need to be evaluated by special personnel on the correctness, completeness, quality, artistic level, cultural connotation, commercial effect, etc. of the program during or after the production is completed, which is called review. . The result of the evaluation may be made by a group of people or someone with decision-making power. The process of reviewing a film is not simply a matter of one person or a group of people watching the finished film from beginning to end. a complex process. Because the review process is very complicated, the professional composition of the reviewers is also very complicated. Some people review the video effects of the programs, some review the audio effects of the programs, and some review the artistic quality of the programs, etc. At the same time, each reviewer Filmmakers have different right to decide whether a program passes the examination. Some film reviewers have the right...
Embodiment 2
[0046] This embodiment is an improvement of the first embodiment, and is a refinement of the rule engine described in the first embodiment. The rule engine described in the present embodiment, as shown in Figure 2, includes:
[0047] Rule engine interface: used for the interaction between the rule engine and the system;
[0048] Rule engine core: It is the processing core for executing rule judgment, including: rule management, process management, rule executor, and application scheduling executor, among which rule management is responsible for comparing the fact base and rule base to determine which rule to execute; the process is responsible for rule execution priority; the rule executor is responsible for executing the rules; the application scheduling executor is used to execute rule decisions;
[0049] Rule base: used to store a set of pre-established and structured film review business rules;
[0050] Rule editor: used to edit the rule entries in the rule base, and com...
Embodiment 3
[0055] This embodiment is an improvement of the above-mentioned embodiment, and is a refinement of each device (submission terminal, each server, storage disk array, and review terminal) of the above-mentioned embodiment, such as image 3 shown. This embodiment submits the functions of the terminal, each server, the storage array, and the review terminal:
[0056] Submission terminal: The submission terminal is set in the program production system and is used to submit a review request to the receiving and storage server of the review center. The command fed back by the center transmits the programs to be reviewed to the screening center. "Submitting an application for review" means that the person who produces the program submits a request for review through the program production system. The production system needs to establish a mutual trust relationship with the review center in advance, so identity recognition is required. Identification includes two aspects: one is wh...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com