Composition and method for oral delivery of androgen prodrugs
a technology of androgen prodrugs and composition methods, applied in the field of health sciences, can solve the problems of less than desirable efficacy or safety of pharmaceuticals, pharmacokinetic variability seen based on food effects, and the effect of orally administered lipophilic drugs
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
example 1
ct Clinical Study
[0110]This study was a single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over, single-dose, four period, four-treatment study to examine the effect of food (fasted vs. high fat) and fat content of food on pharmacokinetics of testosterone & metabolites. 14 subjects were enrolled and 13 completed the study. 225 mg of TU (2 capsules (capsule fill containing 112.5 mg TU at about 15 wt % loading, 63 wt % Maisine 35-1, 16 wt % Cremophor RH 40, and 6 wt % PEG 8000) administered with:[0111]Treatment A: Standard-Fat with 20-35 wt % fat;[0112]Treatment B: Low-Fat with ˜15 wt % fat;[0113]Treatment C: High-Fat with ˜50 wt % fat; and[0114]Treatment D: overnight fasting, to hypogonadal males.
[0115]The meals were as follows in Table I with quantity specified as grams (g) or [% total calories].
TABLE ITotalEnergyTreatment(kcal)CarbohydratesProteinsLipidsA: Standard842.5115.2 g27.7 g30.1 gFat[54.7 wt %][13.2 wt %][32.1 wt %]B: Low Fat911.7 173 g17.8 g16.5 g[75.9 wt %][7.8 wt %][16.3 wt %...
example 2
lent Formulations and Oral Dosage Forms
[0119]The ordinary skilled artisan in view of these results can design and test formulations for bioequivalence (e.g., food effect bioequivalence) using the present disclosure.
[0120]Formulations for testing in a food effect study as described in Example 1 (or another appropriate designed study) can be designed e.g., by:
(1) varying the loading of testosterone undecanoate;
(2) varying the amount of Maisine 35-1, exchanging Maisine 35-1 for another lipophilic additive (in varying amounts) or including one or more additional lipophilic additives in addition to Maisine 35-1 (in varying amounts);
(3) varying the amount of Cremophor RH 40, exchanging Cremophor RH 40 for another hydrophilic additive (in varying amounts) or including one or more additional hydrophilic additives in addition to Cremophor RH 40 (in varying amounts);
(4) varying the amount of PEG 8000 (or not include PEG 8000), exchanging PEG 8000 for another solidifying agent (in varying amou...
example 3
Trial to Show Bioequivalence
[0122]To determine if a Test formulation is bioequivalent to the formulation used in Example 1, a bioequivalence study is performed under the same or similar conditions. One of ordinary skill in the art can design and perform a bioequivalence study in view of the results presented in Example 1. Test formulations can be generated according to this disclosure or more particularly Example 2. The bioequivalence study is one that may support the filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application at the US FDA or similar application in jurisdictions outside of the United States with the appropriate regulatory agency.
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com