Efficient nontoxic antibacterial agent

Abstract

The invention discloses an efficient nontoxic antibacterial agent. The efficient nontoxic antibacterial agent mainly comprises, by weight, 15-25 parts of flos lonicerae, 10-20 parts of flos chrysanthemi, 10-20 parts of herba menthae, 5-15 parts of herba taraxaci, 5-15 parts of aloe barbadensis mill, 10-20 parts of radix glycyrrhizae, 1-5 parts of cellulase, 3-8 parts of chitosan, 1-5 parts of sodium citrate and 40-60 parts of ethyl alcohol. The efficient nontoxic antibacterial agent has the advantages that technological processes are simple, and the efficient nontoxic antibacterial agent is prepared from nontoxic and harmless biological bacteria, is prepared after internal antibacterial components and starch slurry are matched with one another, and accordingly is environmentally friendly,healthful, nontoxic and harmless.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a bacteriostatic agent, in particular to a high-efficiency non-toxic bacteriostatic agent. Background technique [0002] The antibacterial agents currently used in the textile industry generally use chemical antibacterial or physical antibacterial. Usually, chemical antibacterial has a fast sterilization effect and obvious bactericidal effect, but the stability is poor, and improper use is prone to side effects; physical antibacterial is non-irritating. Sex, and the sterilization time is long, can maintain permanent, long-term effect, but its disadvantages are slow onset, low activity, uneven sterilization. It can be seen that chemical antibacterial and physical antibacterial have their own advantages and disadvantages, and they are not satisfactory in use. And be used for the antibacterial of fabric in various industries usually all is to realize by cleaning, disinfection, and its effect is not good. Contents of the inventi...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0002] The antibacterial agents currently used in the textile industry generally use chemical antibacterial or physical antibacterial. Usually, chemical antibacterial has a fast sterilization effect and obvious bactericidal effect, but the stability is poor, and improper use is prone to side effects; physical antibacterial is non-irritating. Sex, and the sterilization time is long, can maintain permanent, long-term effect, but its disadvantages are slow onset, low activity, uneven sterilization

It can be seen that chemical antibacterial and physical antibacterial have their own advantages and disadvantages, and they are not satisfactory in use.

And it is usually used in various industries for fabric antibacterial all to be realized by cleaning and disinfection, and its effect is not good