Cadre examination evaluating method and cadre examination evaluating system based on correlation analysis

Abstract

The invention discloses a cadre examination evaluating method and a cadre examination evaluating system based on correlation analysis. The cadre examination evaluating system comprises the components of a cadre archive management system which is used for extracting basic information of an examined object, an activity report management system which is used for extracting in-charge work of the examined object and work performance information, a network democratic appraisal system which is used for acquiring different evaluation indexes of different kinds of evaluation personnel on the examined object, and a network democratic evaluating system which supplies data support for qualitative evaluation of the cadre in a manner of combining questionnaire selecting and self evaluation. Furthermore through setting different evaluation models, a cadre characteristic evaluation system and a characteristic word database management system for cadre characteristic reports are automatically formed. The cadre examination evaluating method and the cadre examination evaluating system have advantages of improving auxiliary decision level in cadre selection and use, performing correlated deep analysis in multiple aspects, eliminating interference data and contradictory data, obtaining relatively consistent cadre substantial characteristic and checking suggestion, improving evaluation objectivity, improving working efficiency and improving auxiliary decision level in checking.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to the field of administrative management, and more specifically, relates to a method and system for assessing and evaluating cadres based on correlation analysis. Background technique [0002] The cadre assessment and evaluation mechanism plays an important role in guiding, spurring and motivating leading cadres. It is the basic link of cadre selection, appointment and supervision and management. pusher". How well the cadre inspection and evaluation work is done directly affects whether this important goal can be achieved. [0003] At present, personnel departments across the country usually use inspection methods such as consulting archives, democratic evaluation, and cadre conversations to inspect and evaluate cadres. Select and employ people to provide decision-making basis. According to different implementation methods, it can be divided into: [0004] (1) Human-based inspection and evaluation of cadres. [0005]...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0006] The advantage of this kind of method is that the method is mature and widely used. The disadvantage is that the evaluation is not objective enough, sometimes it is not objective enough, and it depends on the staff's sense of responsibility and employment orientation; sometimes the credibility is not enough, and it depends on the organization's personnel department; Take the final vote analysis; work efficiency is generally low, relying on manual statistics

[0018] (2) Manual paper-based democratic assessment is adopted, and the data of the assessment form is calculated manually, which is inefficient

[0019] (3) For the current cadre inspection method based on online evaluation, some participants have psychological burdens in their minds

[0021] (5) The current evaluation of cadre inspections lacks an in-depth analysis of the correlation of cadre inspection data, which directly affects the level of auxiliary decision-making

Some of the democratic evaluation data only count the "overall score", but do not pay attention to the scores of morality, ability, diligence, performance, and honesty

Images