Automatic collaborative decision-making method for professional authentication knowledge

Abstract

The invention relates to an automatic collaborative decision-making method for the professional authentication knowledge. Cooperative decision-making mechanisms of several kinds of evaluation means are provided. To be specific, mainly two kinds of mechanisms including an examination evaluation difficulty adjusting cooperation mechanism and a technical index point and non-technical index point evaluation cooperation mechanism are provided. The examination evaluation difficulty adjusting cooperation mechanism is based on initial examination evaluation T1 and employs curriculum group support evaluation T2, indirection evaluation T3, and space teaching method evaluation T4 as the adjusting evaluation means; and after the initial examination evaluation T1 is adjusted based on cooperation of the cooperative decision-making mechanisms of several kinds of evaluation means, thereby obtaining adjusted examination evaluation T5. According to the technical index point and non-technical index point evaluation cooperation mechanism, whether an index point is a technical index point or a non-technical index point is determined; and cooperation is carried out based on the curriculum group support evaluation T2, indirection evaluation T3, space teaching method evaluation T4, and adjusted examination evaluation T5, thereby obtaining a completion situation of the index point. iterative increment division is carried out and the knowledge is discovered in an iterative mode each time; and thus an opportunity is provided for evaluating the demand and the design again.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to an automatic collaborative decision-making method for professional certification knowledge, which belongs to the field of automation technology. Background technique [0002] In March 2015, the Ministry of Education launched the internationally equivalent "Engineering Education Professional Accreditation Standards", whose core concepts are "output-oriented" and "complex engineering problems" orientation. The professional certification of engineering education is in full swing in universities across the country. [0003] Different colleges and universities also have different evaluation schemes for different graduation requirements, most of which are divided into diagnostic evaluation, formative evaluation, and summary evaluation. A program that measures the achievement evaluation of the course's graduation requirement index points by calculating the average score of each course's examination and evaluation. However, there are...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, there are some loopholes in this plan. It does not establish a relationship between the test content and the graduation requirement indicators that need to be assessed, and cannot reflect the coverage of the test content on the ability support. Ability to achieve impact

Obviously, it is difficult to guarantee the rationality of the evaluation of the method of only using the course assessment score analysis method.

Images