Spine surgery method and implant

Abstract

An implant has a first contact surface to contact a first vertebral body endplate and a second contact surface to contact a second vertebral body endplate adjacent the first vertebral body. The implant is deployable, when positioned within an intradiscal space between the first and second vertebral bodies, from a first non-expanded condition where the first contact surface has a first effective footprint area A1 to a second expanded condition where the first contact surface has a second effective footprint area A2. The ratio A2 / A1 is at least 1.05.

Description

I. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]A. Field of Invention[0002]This invention pertains to the art of methods and apparatuses regarding spine surgery and more specifically relates to surgical procedures, associated instrumentation and an implant to be positioned within an intradiscal space between two adjacent vertebral bodies.[0003]B. Description of the Related Art[0004]The volume of spinal surgeries to treat degenerative disc and facet disease has steadily increased over the past decade, fueled by population demographics and advancements in diagnostic and instrumentation adjuncts. Improvements in intraoperative radiological imaging and surgical technique have generated a great deal of interest in applying minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques to spinal applications. As in other surgical subspecialties, it is hoped such minimally invasive techniques applied to spinal surgery will result in less soft tissue trauma, less operative blood loss, reduced operative time, faster reco...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

This patent is about a method of inserting an implant into the space between two adjacent vertebral bodies during spine surgery. The implant can be inserted in a small condition and then expanded to a larger condition to provide stability and space for the spine. This allows for minimal bone and soft tissue removal. The technical effect is improved spine surgery techniques that provide greater stability and space for the implant.

Problems solved by technology

As a result, known spinal surgical methods, instrumentation and interbody implants have disadvantages.

One disadvantage is that the physical components are relatively large and bulky.

This reduces surgeon visualization of the surgical site.

Another disadvantage of know spinal surgical methods is that known surgical tools and implants are cumbersome and difficult to maneuver within the limited surgical space available.

Despite this progression in intradiscal implant geometry, a device having an optimized geometry to provide an optimal vertebral endplate footplate is lacking.

A specific surgical method and complementary implant instrumentation system is also lacking.

These known techniques along with their associated instruments and implants lack one or more of the criteria for optimal use in anterior, posterior, or transforaminal minimally invasive approaches compatible with currently available minimally invasive spine surgery and / or minimal access spinal techniques (MAST).

Images