Ruggedized electronics enclosure

Abstract

The present invention relates to a ruggedized enclosure for housing and protecting electronic circuits. The enclosure utilizes a top compartment for housing the circuit and a cooling assembly rigidly coupled to the top compartment. The cooling assembly utilizes a passive radiator to form a rigid truss plate structure. The truss plate structure rigidifies the enclosure helping to protect the enclosure and circuit from destructive shock events and destructive vibration events. The cooling assembly further provides an efficient heat exchange for removing heat from the electronic circuit. A method for protecting an electronic circuit utilizing a rigid truss plate structure is also provided.

Description

RELATED APPLICATION [0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 850,523, entitled “Ruggedized Electronics Enclosure”, that was filed on May 19, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 232,915, entitled “Ruggedized Electronics Enclosure,” that was filed on Aug. 30, 2002.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] 1. Field of the Invention [0003] This invention is related to enclosures for electronic circuits and particularly to ruggedized enclosures for use in installations subjected to hostile environments including destructive shock events and destructive vibration events. In one embodiment, the invention may operate without requiring additional mechanical isolation. [0004] 2. Description of the Related Art [0005] Conventional ruggedized electronics enclosures are often employed in military applications. The environments in which military electronic circuits must be able to operate typically present conditions outside of a co...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The solution effectively protects electronic circuits from destructive shock and vibration events up to 60 G without external isolation, ensures efficient heat removal, and maintains a low profile, reducing size and weight while being compatible with COTS components, thus addressing the limitations of conventional enclosures.

Problems solved by technology

Examples of such conditions include excessive moisture, salt, heat, vibrations, and mechanical shock.

While effective in surviving the environment, custom equipment is often significantly more expensive than commercial systems, and is typically difficult if not impossible to upgrade to the latest technologies.

While COTS systems have allowed the military to reduce the cost of equipment and to make more frequent upgrades to existing equipment, there are inherent disadvantages to COTS systems.

Both approaches suffer from added complexity, size, weight and cost.

Taken together, these design considerations drastically increase the cost and complexity of such an enclosure.

Keeping costs down to a minimum is counter to the requirements of making a system robust enough to survive a military environment.

In practice, this is not easily achieved, especially when using larger, and heavier computer systems.

Thus, the idea of completely isolating a commercial system from the rigors of the military environment is difficult to achieve and adds a large cost premium because the rack is the item being modified.

The current solution to supporting COTS technology in a military environment described above, adds significant complexity to the system.

Two of the most difficult conditions to design for are vibration and mechanical shock.

Mechanical shock and vibration may over time destroy electronic equipment by deforming or fracturing enclosures and internal support structures and by causing electrical connectors, circuit card assemblies and other components to fail.

In military applications, as well as in commercial avionics and the automotive industry, electronics must be able to operate while being subjected to constant vibrational forces generated by the vehicle engines, or waves, as well as being subjected to sudden, and often drastic, shocks.

While providing some protection from shock and vibration, the conventional ruggedized enclosure operating alone cannot provide adequate protection for mission-critical electrical components and circuits.

There are several drawbacks to using the mechanically isolated cocoon 100.

Thus, there is still a significant chance for failure within the system.

However, while more effective in protecting the equipment from mechanical shock, these ruggedized enclosures 110 work only when the shock isolation system is carefully integrated with the included systems.

Thus, the cost and complexity of such a system are significantly higher when compared to a commercial system using similar electrical components.

Images