Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Systems and methods for classification of messaging entities

a messaging entity and classification technology, applied in the field of systems and methods for processing communications, can solve the problem that whitelists and blacklists are inherently limited to providing a binary-type (yes/no) respons

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-01-19
MCAFEE INC
View PDF99 Cites 186 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0005] Current tools for message sender analysis include IP blacklists (sometimes called real-time blacklists (RBLs)) and IP whitelists (real-time whitelists (RWLs)). Whitelists and blacklists certainly add value to the spam classification process; however, whitelists and blacklists are inherently limited to providing a binary-type (YES/NO) response to each query. In contrast, a reputation system has the ability to express an opinion of a sender in terms of a scalar number in some defined range. Thus, where blacklists and whitelists are limited to “black and white” responses, a reputation system can express “shades of gray” in it

Problems solved by technology

Whitelists and blacklists certainly add value to the spam classification process; however, whitelists and blacklists are inherently limited to providing a binary-type (YES / NO) response to each query.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Systems and methods for classification of messaging entities
  • Systems and methods for classification of messaging entities
  • Systems and methods for classification of messaging entities

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0015]FIG. 1 depicts at 30 a system for handling transmissions received over a network 40. The transmissions can be many different types of communications, such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages sent from one or more messaging entities 50. The system 30 assigns a classification to a messaging entity (e.g., messaging entity 52), and based upon the classification assigned to the messaging entity, an action is taken with respect to the messaging entity's communication.

[0016] The system 30 uses a filtering system 60 and a reputation system 70 to help process communications from the messaging entities 50. The filtering system 60 uses the reputation system 70 to help determine what filtering action (if any) should be taken upon the messaging entities' communications. For example, the communication may be determined to be from a reputable source and thus the communication should not be filtered.

[0017] The filtering system 60 identifies at 62 one or more message characteristics associa...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

Methods and systems for operation upon one or more data processors for assigning a reputation to a messaging entity. A method can include receiving data that identifies one or more characteristics related to a messaging entity's communication. A reputation score is determined based upon the received identification data. The determined reputation score is indicative of reputation of the messaging entity. The determined reputation score is used in deciding what action is to be taken with respect to a communication associated with the messaging entity.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60 / 625,507 (entitled “Classification of Messaging Entities”) filed on Nov. 5, 2004, of which the entire disclosure (including any and all figures) is incorporated herein by reference. [0002] This application is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority to and the benefit of, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 093,553, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE MESSAGE INTERROGATION THROUGH MULTIPLE QUEUES,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 094,211, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SECURITY,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 094,266, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANOMALY DETECTION IN PATTERNS OF MONITORED COMMUNICATIONS,” all filed on Mar. 8, 2002, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part of, and c...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): G06F11/00G06F11/30G06F11/22G06F12/14H04L9/32G06F11/32G06F11/34G06F11/36G06F12/16G06F15/18G08B23/00
CPCG06F11/008H04L51/12H04L12/585H04L51/212
Inventor JUDGE, PAULALPEROVITCH, DMITRIMOYER, MATT
Owner MCAFEE INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products