Natural language syntactic analysis method
A syntactic analysis and natural language technology, applied in special data processing applications, instruments, electrical digital data processing, etc., can solve the problems that affect the accuracy of syntactic analysis results, insufficient countermeasures of PCFG method, inappropriate processing, etc.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0272] Example 1: That men who were appointed didn't bother the liberals wasn't marked upon by the press.
[0273] This example sentence is preprocessed to generate a word list (i-a) and a word list (i-b). Since the word that in the example sentence has structural ambiguity (structural ambiguity), that may be a subordinate associated word unit or a finite word unit, so two word lists (i) are generated, and the two word lists (i) be identified differently.
[0274] When there is structural ambiguity in a sentence, it is necessary to make multiple word lists (i) for the sentence; the number of word lists (i) can be obtained by using the multiplication principle in combinatorics according to the number of structural ambiguities. This example sentence also contains a structural ambiguity: upon may be both a particle and a preposition, but due to space limitations, it will not be specifically analyzed.
[0275] Word list (i-a):
[0276]
[0277] Word list (i-b):
[0278] ...
example 2
[0444] Example 2: That something you learned is wrong is known to the public.
[0445] That in this example sentence produces structural ambiguity. However, due to limited space, only the word list (ii) that preprocesses That as a subordinate associative word unit is given, as shown below.
[0446] The adjective wrong in this example sentence acts as the predicative of the clause and is the main component of the sentence. However, in order to facilitate computer processing, according to the operation of the application plan, the adjective wrong is temporarily removed in the preprocessing link. The predicative wrong of the clause can be repaired in the subsequent syntactic structure repair link.
[0447]
[0448] According to the scheme of the present application, for example sentence 2, an A-B-C joint system as follows can be generated:
[0449]
[0450] B 1 ={to+
[0451] through the above A 1 -B 1 -C 1 Combined system, the basic framework of the syntactic struct...
example 3
[0455] Example 3: That men were appointed didn't bother the liberals wasn't marked upon by the press.
[0456] The two thats in this example sentence both produce structural ambiguity. However, due to limited space, only the word list (ii) that preprocesses 2 that as subordinate associative word units is given, as follows:
[0457]
[0458] According to the scheme of the present application, for example sentence 3, an A-B-C joint system as follows can be generated:
[0459]
[0460] B 1 ={g[PREP](u)=by+
[0461] through the above A 1 -B 1 -C 1 Combined system, the basic framework of the syntactic structure of example sentence 3 is obtained, such as Figure 33 shown.
[0462] The complete syntactic analysis result of example sentence 3 is expressed as follows in the form of character string: [see Figure 8 ]
[0463] (ROOT(S(SBAR(IN That)(S(SBAR(IN that)(S(NP(NNS men))(VP(VBD were)(VBNappointed))))(VP(VBD did)(RB n't )(VP(VB bother)(NP(DT the)(NNS liberals)))))(...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com