Optical disk device for data defect detection and use

Abstract

A disk physical strain correction signal generator outputs a signal obtained by allowing a phase compensation signal to pass a LPF as a disk physical strain correction signal during a normal period. During a defect detection period, it outputs the output signal of the LPF sampled at the time of the defect detection start as the disk physical strain correction signal. A disturbance pulse correction signal is output based upon a disturbance pulse obtained by subtracting the disk physical strain correction signal from the phase compensation signal. The disk physical strain correction signal and the disturbance pulse correction signal are added to output a defect compensation signal. This defect compensation signal is applied as an actuator control signal during the defect detection period. Thus, it is possible to provide an optical disk device which can carry out a stable driving control for a reproducing operation, etc. without losing the continuity of control before and after the defect detection even when the defect detection period is long.

Description

[0001] This application is a Continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 09 / 784,040, filed on Feb. 16, 2001, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference and for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 120.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] 1. Field of the Invention [0003] The present invention relates to an optical disk device such as a DVD and a CD, and more particularly concerns a control system which can cancel adverse effects caused by a defect located on the optical disk. [0004] 2. Description of the Background Art [0005] In optical disk apparatuses, various methods for reproducing data from a disk in spite of defects such as scratches and stain (hereinafter, referred to as “defective disks”) located thereon have been proposed, and for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 11-259871 (1999) discloses a method in which upon reproducing data from a defective disk, the data is reproduced while interpolating error signals. [0006]FIG. 13 is ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

"The present invention relates to an optical disk device that can detect and compensate for defects in the optical disk. The device includes a light emitting means for emitting light to the optical disk, a driving means for carrying out a predetermined operation with respect to the optical disk, a reflected light information detection means for detecting reflected light information related to reflected light from the optical disk, a normal control signal generation means for generating a normal control signal for determining the amount of control in the predetermined operation, a disturbance pulse correction signal generation means for recognizing a disturbance pulse and generating a defect detection signal, an addition means for adding the defect detection signal to the normal control signal, and a signal selection means for selecting the normal control signal as the driving control signal during the defect detection period. The device can accurately detect and compensate for defects in the optical disk, improving the reliability and stability of the optical disk device."

Problems solved by technology

At the defect end, since the control system is taken too far by the disturbance error, a great control error tends to occur, and in the worst case, it sometimes exceeds the detection range (preliminarily determined) of the control error, resulting in an inoperable state in the control.

In the conventional defect compensation method (first method) shown in FIG. 14B, it is not possible to carry out an interpolation process on the disturbance error during the inevitable time lag period ΔT.

In other words, the conventional defect compensation device shown in FIG. 13 fails to satisfy both of the aforementioned conditions 1 and 2 required for a stable, positive defect compensation process.

Consequently, even in the construction shown in FIG. 15, it is not possible to satisfy both of the conditions 1 and 2 required for a stable, positive defect compensation operation.

The above-mentioned facts indicate that due to (1), it is not possible to satisfy the condition 2 required for a stable, positive defect compensation operation (that is, the relative velocity after the defect compensation process is zero), and that due to (2), it is not possible to satisfy the condition 1 (that is, the control error is zero).

Since the timing of the disturbance pulse end coincides with the start of the defect detection period, the conventional defect compensation method makes the positional error greater in proportion to the defect detection period, sometimes resulting in a case in which the error detection range is exceeded.

Images