Distribution method for aerial area reconnaissance tasks of unmanned aerial vehicle cluster
A task assignment, UAV technology, applied in non-electric variable control, instruments, control/regulation systems, etc., can solve the problems of scattered reconnaissance area, uncertainty, and inapplicability of optimal task decision-making methods
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0141] 3 UAVs carry out target reconnaissance mission assignments to 9 areas where targets are likely to exist within the range of 2000*2000m. The 3 UAVs carry the same sensitive components, numbered U1, U2, and U3, and their flight speeds are all 20m / s, the initial coordinates are (930,1010), (1690,1610), (860,320) respectively.
[0142] Reconnaissance area coordinates and probability μ j As shown in Table 1.
[0143] Table I
[0144] scout area label Reconnaissance area coordinates / km Probability μ j
T 1 (120,1740) 0.95 T 2 (1970,1460) 0.95 T 3 (940,1590) 0.95 T 4 (1980,1970) 0.95 T 5 (1100,1320) 0.90 T 6 (1410,1770) 0.90 T 7 (170,1180) 0.90 T 8 (950,1210) 0.90 T 9 (1430,860) 0.90
[0145] The allocation method proceeds in the following steps:
[0146] S1. Establish a revenue model;
[0147] S2. Initialize the bundle set;
[0148] S3. Preliminary task allocation according to the income model; ...
Embodiment 2
[0174] 4 UAVs assign target reconnaissance tasks to 20 areas where targets are likely to exist within a range of 500*500km.
[0175] Among them, the sensitive components carried by the UAV and their speed and position are shown in Table 2; the type and probability of the reconnaissance area μ j As shown in Table 3, the coordinates of the reconnaissance area are shown in Table 4.
[0176] Table II
[0177]
[0178] Table three
[0179]
[0180] Table four
[0181] label task area type Mission point coordinates / km label task area type Mission point coordinates / km T 1 Type I (219,376) T 11 Type II (138,420) T 2 Type I (191,128) T 12 Type II (340,127) T 3 Type I (383,253) T 13 Type II (328,407) T 4 Type I (398,350) T 14 Type II (81,122) T 5 Type I (93,445) T15 Type II (99,465) T 6 Type I (245.480) T 16 Type II (249,175) T 7 Type I (283,284) T 17 Type II (480,98) T 8 Type ...
experiment example 1
[0220] The result of comparative example 1 ( figure 2 ) and the results of Comparative Example 1 ( image 3 ), it can be clearly found that in the task allocation scheme formed in embodiment 1, the task path of each drone is closer to forming a closed loop, which is more convenient for the recovery of the drone, and it is easier for the drone to perform other subsequent tasks.
[0221] The result of comparative example 2 ( Figure 4 ) and the results of Comparative Example 2 ( Figure 5 ), it can be clearly found that Example 2 forms a task allocation scheme, and the task path of each UAV is closer to forming a closed loop. Compared with the task allocation in Comparative Example 2, the low recovery consumption of the UAV cluster is more practical Reconnaissance task assignment, at the same time, inter-machine communication and update time stamps, avoid multiple drones from performing similar tasks separately, and avoid repeated execution of tasks.
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com