Verification system for commodity anti-counterfeiting information generated by using natural biological information

Abstract

The invention relates to a verification system for commodity anti-counterfeiting information generated by using natural biological information. The system comprises: an anti-counterfeiting informationgeneration module used for generating unique anti-counterfeiting information corresponding to commodities; an anti-counterfeiting database used for storing the unique anti-counterfeiting informationgenerated by the anti-counterfeiting information generation module; and an anti-counterfeiting information verification module used for anti-counterfeiting verification of commodities based on the unique anti-counterfeiting information stored in the anti-counterfeiting database. The anti-counterfeiting information generation module includes: an identity information generator used for randomly generating unique identity information corresponding to the commodities; a natural biological information generation module used for generating natural biological information corresponding to the commodities; and an information binder used for binding and encapsulating the unique identity information with the natural biological information. Compared with the prior art, the verification system for commodity anti-counterfeiting information generated by using natural biological information has the advantages of simple implementation, good anti-counterfeiting performance, cost saving and the like.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the field of anti-counterfeiting technology, in particular to a product anti-counterfeiting verification system formed by using natural biological information. Background technique [0002] With the rise of e-commerce, purchasing agents and other industries, the quickness and convenience of shopping are obvious, but with it, counterfeit goods are rampant and rampant. "A" grade counterfeit products, even if they are brought to genuine stores, there are still examples of being fooled. It is indeed admirable for the cleverness of their counterfeiting methods. Lawbreakers use this to make profits, but it damages the interests of brands and consumers. For example, based on the protection of consumers' rights and interests, the state has formulated relevant regulations on online shopping. If operators sell products through the Internet, consumers have the right to return the products within seven days from the date of receipt withou...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] It is just that this point is exploited by some people, adopting the method of buying genuine and returning fake products. After receiving the returned goods, merchants can only rely on experienced personnel or some external factors such as tags, packaging, anti-theft buckles, etc. to confirm the authenticity of the goods. , it is impossible to quickly and accurately judge by some of the inherent characteristics of the product or the labels attached to the product. It is inevitable that there will be fish that slip through the net, and the "fake" will be returned successfully, which will damage the interests of the brand and maliciously destroy the business environment.

[0004] The most common anti-counterfeiting method currently on the market is the two-dimensional code anti-counterfeiting method, which has the following defects: the existing two-dimensional code anti-counterfeiting method, wherein the two-dimensional code printed on the commodity can be inquired repeatedly indefinitely. The same two-dimensional code is printed on the surface. The existing two-dimensional code label adopts anti-counterfeiting technology made of special materials or processes such as coating, fiber and other medium inks, and special gratings, which makes the cost of two-dimensional code anti-counterfeiting rise. This increases the difficulty and cost of anti-counterfeiting, and there is still the possibility of counterfeiting, and consumers cannot obtain efficient means of judgment, so that relying on manual participation in the comparison has poor reliability, time-consuming and laborious, and cannot be promoted.

However, there are still defects in this method. One is that the attachment is added to the surface of the product, and is compiled into a binary number (or ternary, quaternary, etc.) of fibers or fibers composed of "0" and "1". The allowable range of the angle of the filament is very large, and it is still reproducible, because the counterfeiter only needs to go through the same photographing, conversion, and encoding procedures to obtain the binary number (or ternary, quaternary, etc.) corresponding to the original product. etc.), and then reverse the direction of the fibers or filaments in the characteristic area (vertical or horizontal) and other requirements, and manually attach the corresponding fibers or filaments to the surface of the counterfeit product as required, so that the original product can be copied Identity authentication information, even if the direction of the fibers and filaments on this replica is not strictly the same as that on the original product, as long as it is approximately the same, although this method of counterfeiting is still difficult and the cost of counterfeiting is slightly higher, But for high-value commodities, counterfeiters are still profitable; and this anti-counterfeiting method needs to process the surface of the commodity, which not only increases the difficulty of production but also easily damages the surface of the commodity, causing certain economic losses

Images