High-fidelity fair ranking method applied to subjective scoring environment

Abstract

The invention relates to a high-fidelity fair ranking method applied to a subjective scoring environment. The method includes the following steps that: 1, a score set and the ranking of each player are selected from a primary subjective scoring environment, the same weight is assigned to each referee; 2, the theoretical score of each player is obtained based on the weight, and the ranking of each player is calculated according to the corresponding theoretical score again; 3, the sum of squares of the deviations of sores given by the referees and the theoretical scores obtained in the step 2 is calculated, and the weighted values of the referees are calculated according to an obtained value; 4, the new weighted values in the step 3 are compared with the weighted values in the step 2, if the two set of weighted values are consistent, the method enters step 5, otherwise, the weighted values are updated, and the method enters the step 2; and 5, the weighted values are sequenced according to a descending order, so that corresponding rankings of the referees can be obtained, the higher the weight of a referee is, the higher the ranking of the referee is, and the fairer the judgment of the referee is, while, the smaller the weight of a referee is, the stronger the tendency of the referee is. With the method of the invention adopted, high-fidelity fair rankings which can reflect the feelings of the public can be realized, and the fairness and justice of the referees can be evaluated.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to a high-fidelity fair ranking method in a subjective scoring environment. Background technique [0002] In many competitive competitions, a player's performance score is determined by the subjective ratings of multiple judges. Such projects include diving, gymnastics, project application scoring, personnel qualification evaluation and many other related fields. Although each referee is an expert or professionally trained professional in the field involved in the project, and basically scores based on sound scoring standards, each referee's scoring will still be more or less subjective. Therefore, in subjective scoring projects, the referee's scoring often becomes the focus of attention and discussion topic. In a subjective scoring project, if a referee's score is often quite different from other referees' scores and has a direct impact on the project evaluation results, this may lead to the loss of fairness and fairnes...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

In a subjective scoring project, if a referee's score is often quite different from other referees' scores and has a direct impact on the project evaluation results, this may lead to the loss of fairness and fairness in the project evaluation

Images