Scientific-and-technological-talent job-title classification evaluation method
An evaluation method, a technology of science and technology, applied in the field of technical information evaluation, which can solve the problems such as the emphasis on qualitative indicators, the difficult operation of indicators and the subjective randomness of evaluation, and the lack of evaluation indicators for the characteristics and performance of industrialized talents.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0024] Example 1: see figure 1 , a method for classifying and evaluating professional titles of scientific and technological talents according to the present invention, comprising three steps: classification of scientific and technological talents, establishment of a classification evaluation dimension of professional titles of scientific and technological talents, and classification and evaluation of professional titles of scientific and technological talents; the specific steps include:
[0025] First, the classification of scientific and technological talents is carried out, that is, the classification of scientific and technological talents is divided into scientific and technological researchers, technical research and development personnel, engineering development personnel, industrialization support personnel and scientific and technological public service personnel according to the main activities of scientific and technological talents;
[0026] Secondly, establish a...
Embodiment 2
[0085] Example 2: A method for classifying and evaluating the professional titles of scientific and technological talents, especially a method for evaluating the professional titles of technical R&D personnel, which evaluates technical R&D personnel from the three dimensions of quality, ability and performance, and scores them according to a percentage system;
[0086] 1. Quality evaluation indicators include educational quality evaluation indicators and professional quality evaluation indicators;
[0087] Among them, the evaluation indicators of educational quality are evaluated from two aspects of academic degree and knowledge breadth, with weights of 25% and 35% respectively. The specific evaluation methods are as follows:
[0088] (1) Academic degree:
[0089] 90-100 points for doctoral students, 80-90 points for master’s students, 70-80 points for undergraduates, and 60-70 points for junior college students. Scores can be increased or decreased within the interval accor...
Embodiment 3
[0143] Example 3: A method for classifying and evaluating the professional titles of scientific and technological talents, especially an evaluation method for the professional titles of engineering development personnel, which evaluates technical R&D personnel from the three dimensions of quality, ability and performance, and scores them according to the percentage system;
[0144] 1. Quality evaluation indicators include educational quality evaluation indicators and professional quality evaluation indicators;
[0145] Among them, the evaluation indicators of educational quality are evaluated from two aspects of academic qualifications and knowledge breadth, with weights of 15% and 30% respectively. The specific evaluation methods are as follows:
[0146] (1) Academic degree:
[0147] 90-100 points for doctoral students, 80-90 points for master’s students, 70-80 points for undergraduates, and 60-70 points for junior college students. Scores can be increased or decreased with...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com